Freight Technologies (FRGT) Competitors

Freight Technologies logo
$3.97 -0.16 (-3.87%)
Closing price 06/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.88 -0.10 (-2.39%)
As of 06/24/2026 07:48 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FRGT vs. BTCM, AUC, AUUD, TGL, and DTST

Should you buy Freight Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Freight Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Freight Technologies include BIT Mining (BTCM), ATIF (AUC), Auddia (AUUD), Treasure Global (TGL), and Data Storage (DTST). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Freight Technologies compare to BIT Mining?

BIT Mining (NYSE:BTCM) and Freight Technologies (NASDAQ:FRGT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

BIT Mining has a beta of 3.34, suggesting that its stock price is 234% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Freight Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than BIT Mining. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Freight Technologies and 0 mentions for BIT Mining. Freight Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat BIT Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Freight Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BIT Mining Neutral
Freight Technologies Neutral

BIT Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Freight Technologies' net margin of -60.49%. BIT Mining's return on equity of 0.00% beat Freight Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BIT MiningN/A N/A N/A
Freight Technologies -60.49%-95.48%-45.86%

5.3% of BIT Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.7% of BIT Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

BIT Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Freight Technologies. BIT Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freight Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BIT Mining$24.58M0.26$12.07M-$0.98N/A
Freight Technologies$13.06M0.17-$7.90M-$87.25N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BIT Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Freight Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

BIT Mining beats Freight Technologies on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freight Technologies compare to ATIF?

ATIF (NASDAQ:AUC) and Freight Technologies (NASDAQ:FRGT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ATIF
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Freight Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Freight Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than ATIF. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Freight Technologies and 1 mentions for ATIF. Freight Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat ATIF's score of 0.00 indicating that Freight Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ATIF
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Freight Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ATIF has a beta of 0.06, indicating that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

6.2% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.2% of ATIF shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ATIF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Freight Technologies. ATIF is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freight Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ATIF$1.20M7.08-$4.60M-$7.19N/A
Freight Technologies$13.06M0.17-$7.90M-$87.25N/A

ATIF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Freight Technologies' net margin of -60.49%. ATIF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Freight Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ATIFN/A N/A N/A
Freight Technologies -60.49%-95.48%-45.86%

Summary

ATIF beats Freight Technologies on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freight Technologies compare to Auddia?

Auddia (NASDAQ:AUUD) and Freight Technologies (NASDAQ:FRGT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Auddia has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Freight Technologies' net margin of -60.49%. Freight Technologies' return on equity of -95.48% beat Auddia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AuddiaN/A -232.62% -193.45%
Freight Technologies -60.49%-95.48%-45.86%

Auddia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Freight Technologies. Freight Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Auddia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AuddiaN/AN/A-$7.69M-$40.04N/A
Freight Technologies$13.06M0.17-$7.90M-$87.25N/A

Auddia has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Auddia
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Freight Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Freight Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Auddia. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Freight Technologies and 1 mentions for Auddia. Freight Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Auddia's score of 0.00 indicating that Freight Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Auddia
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Freight Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

6.2% of Freight Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Auddia shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Freight Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Freight Technologies beats Auddia on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freight Technologies compare to Treasure Global?

Treasure Global (NASDAQ:TGL) and Freight Technologies (NASDAQ:FRGT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Freight Technologies has a net margin of -60.49% compared to Treasure Global's net margin of -791.30%. Treasure Global's return on equity of -94.34% beat Freight Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Treasure Global-791.30% -94.34% -68.71%
Freight Technologies -60.49%-95.48%-45.86%

Freight Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Treasure Global. Freight Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Treasure Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Treasure Global$2.33M3.31-$23.38M-$412.66N/A
Freight Technologies$13.06M0.17-$7.90M-$87.25N/A

6.2% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Treasure Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Treasure Global
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Freight Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Freight Technologies had 2 more articles in the media than Treasure Global. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Freight Technologies and 2 mentions for Treasure Global. Freight Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Treasure Global's score of 0.00 indicating that Freight Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Treasure Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Freight Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Treasure Global has a beta of 2.9, meaning that its share price is 190% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Freight Technologies beats Treasure Global on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freight Technologies compare to Data Storage?

Freight Technologies (NASDAQ:FRGT) and Data Storage (NASDAQ:DTST) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freight Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Data Storage
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Freight Technologies has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Data Storage has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Freight Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Data Storage. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Freight Technologies and 1 mentions for Data Storage. Data Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Freight Technologies' score of 0.42 indicating that Data Storage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freight Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Data Storage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

6.2% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.6% of Data Storage shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of Freight Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.8% of Data Storage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Data Storage has a net margin of 81.52% compared to Freight Technologies' net margin of -60.49%. Data Storage's return on equity of -3.76% beat Freight Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freight Technologies-60.49% -95.48% -45.86%
Data Storage 81.52%-3.76%-3.32%

Data Storage has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Freight Technologies. Data Storage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freight Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freight Technologies$13.06M0.17-$7.90M-$87.25N/A
Data Storage$1.38M5.80$19.20M-$0.33N/A

Summary

Data Storage beats Freight Technologies on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Freight Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRGT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRGT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRGT vs. The Competition

MetricFreight TechnologiesTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.36M$7.01B$8.47B$12.32B
Dividend YieldN/A2.41%983.11%5.88%
P/E Ratio-0.0529.0424.6823.95
Price / Sales0.172.195.84107.90
Price / Cash0.159.578.3153.76
Price / Book0.252.472.206.41
Net Income-$7.90M$243.42M$533.02M$337.14M
7 Day Performance4.20%-0.60%-0.86%-1.06%
1 Month Performance0.51%4.20%1.88%0.49%
1 Year Performance-91.10%1.19%32.57%28.43%

Freight Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRGT
Freight Technologies
0.4516 of 5 stars
$3.97
-3.9%
N/A-91.5%$2.36M$13.06MN/A80
BTCM
BIT Mining
0.0647 of 5 stars
$0.50
+1.5%
N/A-79.6%$8.11M$24.58MN/A150
AUC
ATIF
0.8002 of 5 stars
$5.80
flat
N/A+8.4%$7.68M$1.20MN/A10
AUUD
Auddia
0.1689 of 5 stars
$1.34
-2.9%
N/A-96.1%$7.40MN/AN/A20
TGL
Treasure Global
0.6752 of 5 stars
$4.18
-1.6%
N/A-81.7%$7.12M$2.33MN/A50

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FRGT) was last updated on 6/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners