Go Pro

Katapult (KPLT) Competitors

Katapult logo
$6.89 -0.28 (-3.91%)
Closing price 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.81 -0.08 (-1.16%)
As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

KPLT vs. MXCT, OPRX, TCX, SCOR, and FLNT

Should you buy Katapult stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Katapult with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Katapult include MaxCyte (MXCT), OptimizeRx (OPRX), Tucows (TCX), comScore (SCOR), and Fluent (FLNT). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Katapult compare to MaxCyte?

MaxCyte (NASDAQ:MXCT) and Katapult (NASDAQ:KPLT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, MaxCyte and MaxCyte both had 3 articles in the media. Katapult's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat MaxCyte's score of 0.90 indicating that Katapult is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MaxCyte
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Katapult
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

68.8% of MaxCyte shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Katapult shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of MaxCyte shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Katapult shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Katapult has higher revenue and earnings than MaxCyte. MaxCyte is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Katapult, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MaxCyte$32.29M3.58-$44.63M-$0.37N/A
Katapult$298.84M0.11$1.37M$1.155.99

MaxCyte has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Katapult has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

MaxCyte presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 362.96%. Katapult has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given MaxCyte's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MaxCyte is more favorable than Katapult.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MaxCyte
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Katapult
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Katapult has a net margin of 2.48% compared to MaxCyte's net margin of -121.16%. Katapult's return on equity of -16.24% beat MaxCyte's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MaxCyte-121.16% -20.03% -17.14%
Katapult 2.48%-16.24%7.63%

Summary

Katapult beats MaxCyte on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Katapult compare to OptimizeRx?

Katapult (NASDAQ:KPLT) and OptimizeRx (NASDAQ:OPRX) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Katapult presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. OptimizeRx has a consensus target price of $13.43, suggesting a potential upside of 115.20%. Given OptimizeRx's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe OptimizeRx is more favorable than Katapult.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Katapult
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
OptimizeRx
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

In the previous week, OptimizeRx had 1 more articles in the media than Katapult. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for OptimizeRx and 3 mentions for Katapult. Katapult's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat OptimizeRx's score of 0.25 indicating that Katapult is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Katapult
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
OptimizeRx
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

26.8% of Katapult shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of OptimizeRx shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Katapult shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.5% of OptimizeRx shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Katapult has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, OptimizeRx has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

OptimizeRx has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Katapult. Katapult is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OptimizeRx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Katapult$298.84M0.11$1.37M$1.155.99
OptimizeRx$107.35M1.09$5.13M$0.3517.83

OptimizeRx has a net margin of 6.37% compared to Katapult's net margin of 2.48%. OptimizeRx's return on equity of 10.86% beat Katapult's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Katapult2.48% -16.24% 7.63%
OptimizeRx 6.37%10.86%7.93%

Summary

OptimizeRx beats Katapult on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Katapult compare to Tucows?

Tucows (NASDAQ:TCX) and Katapult (NASDAQ:KPLT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Katapult had 1 more articles in the media than Tucows. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Katapult and 2 mentions for Tucows. Katapult's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Tucows' score of 0.94 indicating that Katapult is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tucows
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Katapult
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

73.6% of Tucows shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Katapult shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Tucows shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Katapult shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Katapult has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tucows. Tucows is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Katapult, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tucows$390.30M0.25-$75.82M-$7.10N/A
Katapult$298.84M0.11$1.37M$1.155.99

Tucows has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Katapult has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Katapult has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Katapult's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Katapult is more favorable than Tucows.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tucows
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Katapult
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Katapult has a net margin of 2.48% compared to Tucows' net margin of -20.08%. Tucows' return on equity of 0.00% beat Katapult's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tucows-20.08% N/A -9.18%
Katapult 2.48%-16.24%7.63%

Summary

Katapult beats Tucows on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Katapult compare to comScore?

Katapult (NASDAQ:KPLT) and comScore (NASDAQ:SCOR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Katapult has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, comScore has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

comScore has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Katapult's net margin of 2.48%. comScore's return on equity of 230.75% beat Katapult's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Katapult2.48% -16.24% 7.63%
comScore 24.81%230.75%23.84%

26.8% of Katapult shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.2% of comScore shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Katapult shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of comScore shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Katapult and Katapult both had 3 articles in the media. Katapult's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat comScore's score of 0.33 indicating that Katapult is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Katapult
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
comScore
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Katapult presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Katapult's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Katapult is more favorable than comScore.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Katapult
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
comScore
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Katapult has higher earnings, but lower revenue than comScore. comScore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Katapult, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Katapult$298.84M0.11$1.37M$1.155.99
comScore$357.08M0.30-$10M$2.343.03

Summary

comScore beats Katapult on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Katapult compare to Fluent?

Katapult (NASDAQ:KPLT) and Fluent (NASDAQ:FLNT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Katapult has a net margin of 2.48% compared to Fluent's net margin of -12.22%. Katapult's return on equity of -16.24% beat Fluent's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Katapult2.48% -16.24% 7.63%
Fluent -12.22%-132.41%-30.65%

Katapult currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Fluent has a consensus price target of $4.25, suggesting a potential upside of 24.27%. Given Katapult's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Katapult is more favorable than Fluent.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Katapult
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Fluent
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Katapult has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fluent has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Katapult had 1 more articles in the media than Fluent. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Katapult and 2 mentions for Fluent. Katapult's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Fluent's score of 0.93 indicating that Katapult is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Katapult
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fluent
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

26.8% of Katapult shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.3% of Fluent shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of Katapult shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.4% of Fluent shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Katapult has higher revenue and earnings than Fluent. Fluent is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Katapult, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Katapult$298.84M0.11$1.37M$1.155.99
Fluent$198.41M0.51-$27.17M-$0.87N/A

Summary

Katapult beats Fluent on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Katapult News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KPLT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KPLT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KPLT vs. The Competition

MetricKatapultTechnology Services IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$32.83M$3.81B$6.82B$12.26B
Dividend YieldN/A2.21%3.09%9.79%
P/E Ratio5.9933.8528.1523.64
Price / Sales0.1139.95312.4189.57
Price / Cash0.2034.0922.6859.64
Price / Book-0.863.845.466.07
Net Income$1.37M$31.76M$205.01M$331.99M
7 Day Performance0.15%-1.90%-1.95%-0.63%
1 Month Performance6.00%-7.80%-2.71%-2.00%
1 Year Performance-46.51%-6.23%4.47%13.62%

Katapult Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KPLT
Katapult
2.0175 of 5 stars
$6.89
-3.9%
$10.00
+45.1%
-44.8%$32.83M$298.84M5.99130
MXCT
MaxCyte
3.3272 of 5 stars
$1.23
+5.1%
$5.50
+347.2%
-52.4%$125.33M$33.03MN/A80
OPRX
OptimizeRx
4.4215 of 5 stars
$6.66
+2.3%
$13.43
+101.6%
-55.2%$122.16M$107.35M19.03100
TCX
Tucows
0.1965 of 5 stars
$9.86
-3.8%
N/A-58.6%$114.28M$390.30MN/A1,000
SCOR
comScore
1.2268 of 5 stars
$7.51
+0.8%
N/A+21.3%$112.45M$357.47M1.961,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:KPLT) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners