Free Trial

This company has been marked as potentially delisted and may not be actively trading.

Bird Global (BRDS) Competitors

Bird Global logo

BRDS vs. BINI, ECDA, DCFCQ, TSLA, and TM

Should you be buying Bird Global stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Bird Global include Bollinger Innovations (BINI), ECD Automotive Design (ECDA), Tritium DCFC (DCFCQ), Tesla (TSLA), and Toyota Motor (TM). These companies are all part of the "auto/tires/trucks" sector.

How does Bird Global compare to Bollinger Innovations?

Bollinger Innovations (NASDAQ:BINI) and Bird Global (NYSE:BRDS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

11.7% of Bollinger Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Bollinger Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.7% of Bird Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bird Global has higher revenue and earnings than Bollinger Innovations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bollinger Innovations$9.34M0.00-$457.06MN/AN/A
Bird Global$220.39M0.00-$358.74M-$8.45N/A

In the previous week, Bollinger Innovations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Bird Global's score of -0.25 indicating that Bollinger Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bollinger Innovations Neutral
Bird Global Neutral

Bird Global has a net margin of -54.42% compared to Bollinger Innovations' net margin of -5,005.77%. Bollinger Innovations' return on equity of 0.00% beat Bird Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bollinger Innovations-5,005.77% N/A -318.48%
Bird Global -54.42%-793.84%-51.28%

Bollinger Innovations has a beta of -1.33, suggesting that its share price is 233% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bird Global has a beta of 2.53, suggesting that its share price is 153% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Bird Global beats Bollinger Innovations on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bird Global compare to ECD Automotive Design?

ECD Automotive Design (NASDAQ:ECDA) and Bird Global (NYSE:BRDS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

ECD Automotive Design has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bird Global has a beta of 2.53, meaning that its stock price is 153% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, ECD Automotive Design's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Bird Global's score of -0.25 indicating that ECD Automotive Design is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ECD Automotive Design Neutral
Bird Global Neutral

ECD Automotive Design has a net margin of -33.06% compared to Bird Global's net margin of -54.42%. ECD Automotive Design's return on equity of 0.00% beat Bird Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ECD Automotive Design-33.06% N/A -52.37%
Bird Global -54.42%-793.84%-51.28%

94.8% of ECD Automotive Design shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of ECD Automotive Design shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.7% of Bird Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ECD Automotive Design
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Bird Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

ECD Automotive Design has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bird Global. ECD Automotive Design is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bird Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ECD Automotive Design$24.50M0.00-$10.77M-$53.00N/A
Bird Global$220.39M0.00-$358.74M-$8.45N/A

Summary

ECD Automotive Design beats Bird Global on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bird Global compare to Tritium DCFC?

Bird Global (NYSE:BRDS) and Tritium DCFC (NASDAQ:DCFCQ) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Bird Global has a beta of 2.53, suggesting that its share price is 153% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tritium DCFC has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Tritium DCFC's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Bird Global's score of -0.25 indicating that Tritium DCFC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bird Global Neutral
Tritium DCFC Neutral

Tritium DCFC has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bird Global's net margin of -54.42%. Tritium DCFC's return on equity of 0.00% beat Bird Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bird Global-54.42% -793.84% -51.28%
Tritium DCFC N/A N/A N/A

8.3% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by institutional investors. 29.7% of Bird Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Tritium DCFC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tritium DCFC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bird Global.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bird Global$220.39M0.00-$358.74M-$8.45N/A
Tritium DCFC$184.54M0.00-$121.37MN/AN/A

Summary

Tritium DCFC beats Bird Global on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bird Global compare to Tesla?

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Bird Global (NYSE:BRDS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Tesla currently has a consensus target price of $398.42, indicating a potential downside of 1.89%. Given Tesla's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Tesla is more favorable than Bird Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tesla
5 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.34
Bird Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Tesla had 232 more articles in the media than Bird Global. MarketBeat recorded 232 mentions for Tesla and 0 mentions for Bird Global. Tesla's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Bird Global's score of -0.25 indicating that Tesla is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tesla Positive
Bird Global Neutral

Tesla has a net margin of 3.95% compared to Bird Global's net margin of -54.42%. Tesla's return on equity of 4.89% beat Bird Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tesla3.95% 4.89% 2.93%
Bird Global -54.42%-793.84%-51.28%

66.2% of Tesla shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Tesla shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.7% of Bird Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tesla has higher revenue and earnings than Bird Global. Bird Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tesla$94.83B16.08$3.79B$1.09372.55
Bird Global$220.39M0.00-$358.74M-$8.45N/A

Tesla has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bird Global has a beta of 2.53, suggesting that its stock price is 153% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Tesla beats Bird Global on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bird Global compare to Toyota Motor?

Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Bird Global (NYSE:BRDS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bird Global has a beta of 2.53, suggesting that its stock price is 153% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Bird Global's net margin of -54.42%. Toyota Motor's return on equity of 9.67% beat Bird Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Toyota Motor7.32% 9.67% 3.81%
Bird Global -54.42%-793.84%-51.28%

Toyota Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Bird Global. Bird Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Toyota Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Toyota Motor$315.45B0.78$31.45B$18.9710.01
Bird Global$220.39M0.00-$358.74M-$8.45N/A

Toyota Motor presently has a consensus target price of $290.00, suggesting a potential upside of 52.70%. Given Toyota Motor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Toyota Motor is more favorable than Bird Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Toyota Motor
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Bird Global
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

1.5% of Toyota Motor shares are held by institutional investors. 29.7% of Bird Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Toyota Motor had 17 more articles in the media than Bird Global. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Toyota Motor and 0 mentions for Bird Global. Toyota Motor's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Bird Global's score of -0.25 indicating that Toyota Motor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Toyota Motor Neutral
Bird Global Neutral

Summary

Toyota Motor beats Bird Global on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bird Global News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BRDS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BRDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BRDS vs. The Competition

MetricBird GlobalMotorcycles, bicycles, & parts IndustryAuto SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$16K$7.03B$22.35B$23.00B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A2.75%4.03%
P/E Ratio0.004.4424.2528.63
Price / Sales0.000.4117.1614.43
Price / CashN/A5.1411.5925.32
Price / Book0.000.873.064.60
Net Income-$358.74M$1.17B$429.99M$1.07B

Bird Global Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BRDS
Bird Global
N/A$0.00
flat
N/AN/A$16K$220.39MN/A8
BINI
Bollinger Innovations
N/A$0.07
-35.8%
N/A-100.0%$55K$9.34MN/A120
ECDA
ECD Automotive Design
N/A$0.01
flat
N/AN/A$16K$24.50MN/AN/A
DCFCQ
Tritium DCFC
N/AN/AN/AN/A$0.00$184.54MN/A818
TSLA
Tesla
2.6738 of 5 stars
$376.30
+0.7%
$398.45
+5.9%
+44.8%$1.41T$97.88B345.23134,785

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BRDS) was last updated on 5/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners