Skip to main content
OTCMKTS:GTXO

GTX Competitors

$0.03
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.03
$0.03
50-Day Range
$0.02
$0.05
52-Week Range
$0.01
$0.15
Volume1.68 million shs
Average Volume4.46 million shs
Market Capitalization$5.78 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.51

Competitors

GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) Vs. CRVW, BDR, SIML, AFTM, ANDR, and SCON

Should you be buying GTXO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "radio & t.v. communications equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to GTX, including CareView Communications (CRVW), Blonder Tongue Laboratories (BDR), Simlatus (SIML), AfterMaster (AFTM), Andrea Electronics (ANDR), and Superconductor Technologies (SCON).

GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) and CareView Communications (OTCMKTS:CRVW) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of GTX shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.9% of CareView Communications shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares GTX and CareView Communications' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GTX-9.76%N/A-26.40%
CareView Communications-209.37%N/A-229.86%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for GTX and CareView Communications, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GTX0000N/A
CareView Communications0000N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares GTX and CareView Communications' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GTX$1.50 million3.85$-590,000.00N/AN/A
CareView Communications$6.29 million3.10$-14,140,000.00N/AN/A

GTX has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CareView Communications.

Volatility & Risk

GTX has a beta of 2.51, indicating that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CareView Communications has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

GTX beats CareView Communications on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Blonder Tongue Laboratories (NYSEAMERICAN:BDR) and GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Blonder Tongue Laboratories and GTX, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Blonder Tongue Laboratories0000N/A
GTX0000N/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.6% of Blonder Tongue Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of GTX shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Blonder Tongue Laboratories shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Blonder Tongue Laboratories and GTX's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Blonder Tongue Laboratories-52.07%-180.97%-54.66%
GTX-9.76%N/A-26.40%

Risk & Volatility

Blonder Tongue Laboratories has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GTX has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Blonder Tongue Laboratories and GTX's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blonder Tongue Laboratories$19.84 million0.70$-740,000.00N/AN/A
GTX$1.50 million3.85$-590,000.00N/AN/A

GTX has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blonder Tongue Laboratories.

Summary

GTX beats Blonder Tongue Laboratories on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Simlatus (OTCMKTS:SIML) and GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Simlatus and GTX's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SimlatusN/AN/A-82,074.06%
GTX-9.76%N/A-26.40%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Simlatus and GTX's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Simlatus$120,000.0068.64$-52,410,000.00N/AN/A
GTX$1.50 million3.85$-590,000.00N/AN/A

GTX has higher revenue and earnings than Simlatus.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Simlatus and GTX, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Simlatus0000N/A
GTX0000N/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.0% of GTX shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Simlatus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Simlatus has a beta of 3.52, suggesting that its share price is 252% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, GTX has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its share price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500.

GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) and AfterMaster (OTCMKTS:AFTM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for GTX and AfterMaster, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GTX0000N/A
AfterMaster0000N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GTX and AfterMaster's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GTX$1.50 million3.85$-590,000.00N/AN/A
AfterMaster$980,000.005.22$-9,300,000.00N/AN/A

GTX has higher revenue and earnings than AfterMaster.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of GTX shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of AfterMaster shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of AfterMaster shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares GTX and AfterMaster's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GTX-9.76%N/A-26.40%
AfterMasterN/AN/AN/A

Volatility and Risk

GTX has a beta of 2.51, indicating that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AfterMaster has a beta of -1.35, indicating that its stock price is 235% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AfterMaster beats GTX on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) and Andrea Electronics (OTCMKTS:ANDR) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

GTX has a beta of 2.51, indicating that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Andrea Electronics has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of GTX shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Andrea Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares GTX and Andrea Electronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GTX-9.76%N/A-26.40%
Andrea Electronics-44.49%N/A-57.25%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for GTX and Andrea Electronics, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GTX0000N/A
Andrea Electronics0000N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares GTX and Andrea Electronics' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GTX$1.50 million3.85$-590,000.00N/AN/A
Andrea Electronics$1.89 million2.16$-550,000.00N/AN/A

Andrea Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than GTX.

Summary

GTX beats Andrea Electronics on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

Risk & Volatility

GTX has a beta of 2.51, indicating that its share price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares GTX and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GTX-9.76%N/A-26.40%
Superconductor TechnologiesN/A-199.09%-153.32%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for GTX and Superconductor Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GTX0000N/A
Superconductor Technologies0000N/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of GTX shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Superconductor Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GTX and Superconductor Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GTX$1.50 million3.85$-590,000.00N/AN/A
Superconductor Technologies$550,000.006.36$-9,230,000.00N/AN/A

GTX has higher revenue and earnings than Superconductor Technologies.

Summary

GTX beats Superconductor Technologies on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.


GTX Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CareView Communications logo
CRVW
CareView Communications
0.6$0.14flat$19.51 million$6.29 million-1.56Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Down
BDR
Blonder Tongue Laboratories
0.7$1.16flat$13.88 million$19.84 million0.00News Coverage
Gap Down
Simlatus logo
SIML
Simlatus
0.5$0.00flat$8.24 million$120,000.000.00Gap Down
AfterMaster logo
AFTM
AfterMaster
0.4$0.01flat$5.12 million$980,000.000.00Gap Up
Andrea Electronics logo
ANDR
Andrea Electronics
0.5$0.06flat$4.09 million$1.89 million0.00Gap Up
SCON
Superconductor Technologies
0.0$1.11flat$3.50 million$550,000.00-0.17Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
NEIK
Northstar Electronics
0.4$0.01flat$1.09 millionN/A0.00
Proxim Wireless logo
PRXM
Proxim Wireless
0.0$3.44flat$826,000.00N/A0.00
CMRO
COMARCO
0.4$0.02flat$300,000.00N/A0.00Gap Down
WGNR
Wegener
0.0$0.03flat$0.00N/A0.00
ZSTN
ZST Digital Networks
0.2$0.01flat$0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 5/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.