Free Trial

Cineverse (CNVS) Competitors

Cineverse logo
$2.82 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.84 +0.02 (+0.53%)
As of 06/12/2026 07:53 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CNVS vs. CURI, PUSA, SEAT, GAMB, and GAIA

Should you buy Cineverse stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cineverse with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cineverse include CuriosityStream (CURI), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), and Gaia (GAIA). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Cineverse compare to CuriosityStream?

CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

CuriosityStream has a net margin of -11.26% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -16.67%. CuriosityStream's return on equity of -18.46% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CuriosityStream-11.26% -18.46% -10.83%
Cineverse -16.67%-27.40%-13.94%

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Cineverse shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cineverse has higher revenue and earnings than CuriosityStream. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineverse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CuriosityStream$71.66M2.09-$6.43M-$0.13N/A
Cineverse$78.18M0.77$3.60M-$0.53N/A

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 2 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CuriosityStream and 1 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat CuriosityStream's score of 0.37 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CuriosityStream Neutral
Cineverse Very Positive

CuriosityStream currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 136.22%. Cineverse has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 219.15%. Given Cineverse's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than CuriosityStream.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

CuriosityStream has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Cineverse on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cineverse compare to Aureus Greenway?

Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. 38.6% of Aureus Greenway shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cineverse has a net margin of -16.67% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Aureus Greenway's return on equity of -17.49% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aureus Greenway-167.57% -17.49% -16.56%
Cineverse -16.67%-27.40%-13.94%

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 219.15%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Aureus Greenway.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Aureus Greenway has a beta of 4.73, indicating that its stock price is 373% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 2 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 1 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Aureus Greenway's score of 0.54 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aureus Greenway Positive
Cineverse Very Positive

Cineverse has higher revenue and earnings than Aureus Greenway. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineverse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aureus Greenway$2.96M34.37-$3.68M-$0.31N/A
Cineverse$78.18M0.77$3.60M-$0.53N/A

Summary

Cineverse beats Aureus Greenway on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cineverse compare to Vivid Seats?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Cineverse has a net margin of -16.67% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-82.25% 68.65% 5.92%
Cineverse -16.67%-27.40%-13.94%

Cineverse has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Cineverse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$532.54M0.16-$429.30M-$69.61N/A
Cineverse$78.18M0.77$3.60M-$0.53N/A

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 4 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.74 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats Positive
Cineverse Very Positive

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus target price of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 21.56%. Cineverse has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 219.15%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Vivid Seats has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cineverse beats Vivid Seats on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cineverse compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Cineverse has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Cineverse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.51-$32.93M-$1.29N/A
Cineverse$78.18M0.77$3.60M-$0.53N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Cineverse shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gambling.com Group presently has a consensus price target of $7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 204.75%. Cineverse has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 219.15%. Given Cineverse's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Gambling.com Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Cineverse has a net margin of -16.67% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-27.44% 27.61% 11.20%
Cineverse -16.67%-27.40%-13.94%

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 1 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.94 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Positive
Cineverse Very Positive

Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Cineverse on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cineverse compare to Gaia?

Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) and Gaia (NASDAQ:GAIA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Gaia had 5 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaia and 1 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Gaia's score of 0.65 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cineverse Very Positive
Gaia Positive

Cineverse presently has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 219.15%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Gaia.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Gaia
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Cineverse has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gaia. Gaia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineverse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cineverse$78.18M0.77$3.60M-$0.53N/A
Gaia$98.95M0.64-$4.49M-$0.19N/A

8.2% of Cineverse shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.5% of Gaia shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of Cineverse shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Gaia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaia has a net margin of -4.76% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -16.67%. Gaia's return on equity of -4.62% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cineverse-16.67% -27.40% -13.94%
Gaia -4.76%-4.62%-3.06%

Cineverse has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaia has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cineverse and Gaia tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cineverse News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CNVS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CNVS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CNVS vs. The Competition

MetricCineverseMEDIA CONGLOM IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$60.07M$14.88B$7.37B$12.05B
Dividend YieldN/A3.69%2.97%5.66%
P/E Ratio-5.3232.3120.7824.42
Price / Sales0.773.054.25112.54
Price / Cash5.7315.8513.4237.92
Price / Book1.322.273.766.82
Net Income$3.60M$924.61M$246.38M$337.56M
7 Day Performance12.35%2.34%2.17%1.16%
1 Month Performance11.02%0.73%4.29%3.16%
1 Year Performance-25.40%27.78%8.21%30.60%

Cineverse Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CNVS
Cineverse
2.7536 of 5 stars
$2.82
flat
$9.00
+219.1%
-25.4%$60.07M$78.18MN/A134
CURI
CuriosityStream
4.61 of 5 stars
$2.82
-0.7%
$6.00
+112.8%
-44.7%$167.49M$71.66MN/A90
PUSA
Aureus Greenway
0.3853 of 5 stars
$5.08
flat
N/A+695.9%$109.75M$2.96MN/A40
SEAT
Vivid Seats
2.3074 of 5 stars
$8.21
-1.4%
$9.27
+12.9%
-78.3%$89.68M$570.78MN/A430
GAMB
Gambling.com Group
4.7023 of 5 stars
$2.43
+0.4%
$7.38
+203.5%
-79.4%$84.93M$165.45MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CNVS) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners