Cineverse (CNVS) Competitors

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 2 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.45 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gambling.com Group has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Cineverse has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Cineverse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cineverse has a net margin of -16.67% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -19.90%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 38.87% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Gambling.com Group presently has a consensus price target of $7.63, suggesting a potential upside of 90.15%. Cineverse has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 261.45%. Given Cineverse's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Gambling.com Group.

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cineverse has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 261.45%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Aureus Greenway.

Aureus Greenway has a beta of 5.22, indicating that its share price is 422% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cineverse has a beta of 1.59, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. 38.6% of Aureus Greenway shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cineverse had 1 more articles in the media than Aureus Greenway. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Cineverse and 1 mentions for Aureus Greenway. Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Cineverse's score of 0.70 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cineverse has higher revenue and earnings than Aureus Greenway. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineverse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cineverse has a net margin of -16.67% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -124.06%. Aureus Greenway's return on equity of -16.59% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

In the previous week, Gaia had 6 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Gaia and 2 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Gaia's score of 0.16 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gaia has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Gaia has a net margin of -4.76% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -16.67%. Gaia's return on equity of -4.62% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.5% of Gaia shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.0% of Gaia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cineverse currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 261.45%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Gaia.

Cineverse has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gaia. Gaia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineverse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 6 more articles in the media than Cineverse. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Vivid Seats and 2 mentions for Cineverse. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Vivid Seats' score of -0.33 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cineverse has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Cineverse has a net margin of -16.67% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -75.21%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 31.44% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 89.2% of Vivid Seats shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cineverse currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 261.45%. Vivid Seats has a consensus target price of $14.27, suggesting a potential upside of 99.23%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Vivid Seats.

Cineverse has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Cineverse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.