Which has higher earnings & valuation, NOV or EFXT?

NOV has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NOV $8.74B 0.81 $145M $0.26 76.33 Enerflex $2.57B 0.95 $64M $0.43 46.31

Is NOV or EFXT more profitable?

Enerflex has a net margin of 2.06% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. Enerflex's return on equity of 11.76% beat NOV's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NOV 1.10% 3.44% 1.94% Enerflex 2.06% 11.76% 4.84%

Does the media refer more to NOV or EFXT?

In the previous week, NOV had 14 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for NOV and 6 mentions for Enerflex. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat NOV's score of 1.08 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment NOV 10 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enerflex 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation & earnings, EFXT or LB?

Enerflex has higher revenue and earnings than LandBridge. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LandBridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Enerflex $2.57B 0.95 $64M $0.43 46.31 LandBridge $199.09M 33.65 $30.13M $1.13 76.92

Is EFXT or LB more profitable?

LandBridge has a net margin of 16.49% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 2.06%. Enerflex's return on equity of 11.76% beat LandBridge's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Enerflex 2.06% 11.76% 4.84% LandBridge 16.49% 4.75% 2.87%

Does the media refer more to EFXT or LB?

In the previous week, Enerflex had 4 more articles in the media than LandBridge. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Enerflex and 2 mentions for LandBridge. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat LandBridge's score of 0.30 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerflex 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive LandBridge 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor EFXT or KGS?

In the previous week, Kodiak Gas Services had 7 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Kodiak Gas Services and 6 mentions for Enerflex. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Kodiak Gas Services' score of 1.26 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerflex 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kodiak Gas Services 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, EFXT or WHD?

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerflex. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Enerflex $2.57B 0.95 $64M $0.43 46.31 Cactus $1.08B 5.05 $166.01M $1.17 58.09

Is EFXT or WHD more profitable?

Cactus has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 2.06%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Enerflex's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Enerflex 2.06% 11.76% 4.84% Cactus 6.01% 16.66% 10.81%

Does the media prefer EFXT or WHD?

In the previous week, Cactus had 13 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Cactus and 6 mentions for Enerflex. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Cactus' score of 0.34 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerflex 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cactus 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Enerflex (EFXT) Competitors

$19.92 +0.20 (+0.99%)

As of 11:41 AM Eastern

Compare

EFXT vs. NOV, LB, WFRD, KGS, and WHD

Should you buy Enerflex stock or one of its competitors? Enerflex's main competitors and comparable companies include NOV (NOV), LandBridge (LB), Weatherford International (WFRD), Kodiak Gas Services (KGS), and Cactus (WHD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Enerflex compare to NOV?

NOV (NYSE:NOV) and Enerflex (NYSE:EFXT) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Enerflex has a net margin of 2.06% compared to NOV's net margin of 1.10%. Enerflex's return on equity of 11.76% beat NOV's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NOV	1.10%	3.44%	1.94%
Enerflex	2.06%	11.76%	4.84%

NOV currently has a consensus price target of $21.31, indicating a potential upside of 7.37%. Enerflex has a consensus price target of $35.17, indicating a potential upside of 76.58%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than NOV.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NOV	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.31
Enerflex	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

NOV has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NOV	$8.74B	0.81	$145M	$0.26	76.33
Enerflex	$2.57B	0.95	$64M	$0.43	46.31

NOV pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. NOV pays out 138.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enerflex pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NOV has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Enerflex has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

93.3% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of NOV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NOV has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerflex has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, NOV had 14 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for NOV and 6 mentions for Enerflex. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat NOV's score of 1.08 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
NOV	10 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enerflex	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Enerflex beats NOV on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerflex compare to LandBridge?

Enerflex (NYSE:EFXT) and LandBridge (NYSE:LB) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.3% of LandBridge shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

LandBridge has a net margin of 16.49% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 2.06%. Enerflex's return on equity of 11.76% beat LandBridge's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerflex	2.06%	11.76%	4.84%
LandBridge	16.49%	4.75%	2.87%

Enerflex has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LandBridge has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its share price is 93% less volatile than the broader market.

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. LandBridge pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Enerflex pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. LandBridge pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Enerflex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enerflex presently has a consensus price target of $35.17, suggesting a potential upside of 76.58%. LandBridge has a consensus price target of $79.20, suggesting a potential downside of 8.88%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than LandBridge.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerflex	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
LandBridge	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11

Enerflex has higher revenue and earnings than LandBridge. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LandBridge, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerflex	$2.57B	0.95	$64M	$0.43	46.31
LandBridge	$199.09M	33.65	$30.13M	$1.13	76.92

In the previous week, Enerflex had 4 more articles in the media than LandBridge. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Enerflex and 2 mentions for LandBridge. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat LandBridge's score of 0.30 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerflex	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
LandBridge	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Enerflex beats LandBridge on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerflex compare to Weatherford International?

Enerflex (NYSE:EFXT) and Weatherford International (NASDAQ:WFRD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Enerflex presently has a consensus target price of $35.17, suggesting a potential upside of 76.58%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $114.25, suggesting a potential upside of 28.99%. Given Enerflex's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Weatherford International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerflex	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Weatherford International	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Weatherford International has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerflex	$2.57B	0.95	$64M	$0.43	46.31
Weatherford International	$4.78B	1.33	$431M	$5.07	17.47

In the previous week, Enerflex had 6 more articles in the media than Weatherford International. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Enerflex and 0 mentions for Weatherford International. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Weatherford International's score of 1.00 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Enerflex	Positive
Weatherford International	Positive

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Enerflex pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Weatherford International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Weatherford International has a net margin of 7.66% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 2.06%. Weatherford International's return on equity of 21.50% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerflex	2.06%	11.76%	4.84%
Weatherford International	7.66%	21.50%	7.09%

Enerflex has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Weatherford International beats Enerflex on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerflex compare to Kodiak Gas Services?

Enerflex (NYSE:EFXT) and Kodiak Gas Services (NYSE:KGS) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Kodiak Gas Services has a net margin of 5.77% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 2.06%. Kodiak Gas Services' return on equity of 11.92% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerflex	2.06%	11.76%	4.84%
Kodiak Gas Services	5.77%	11.92%	3.70%

Enerflex presently has a consensus target price of $35.17, suggesting a potential upside of 76.58%. Kodiak Gas Services has a consensus target price of $78.89, suggesting a potential upside of 30.69%. Given Enerflex's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Kodiak Gas Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerflex	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Kodiak Gas Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

In the previous week, Kodiak Gas Services had 7 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Kodiak Gas Services and 6 mentions for Enerflex. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Kodiak Gas Services' score of 1.26 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerflex	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kodiak Gas Services	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Kodiak Gas Services pays an annual dividend of $1.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Enerflex pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kodiak Gas Services pays out 233.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enerflex has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kodiak Gas Services has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Kodiak Gas Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kodiak Gas Services has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.0% of Kodiak Gas Services shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Kodiak Gas Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kodiak Gas Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerflex. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kodiak Gas Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerflex	$2.57B	0.95	$64M	$0.43	46.31
Kodiak Gas Services	$1.31B	4.67	$80.52M	$0.84	71.86

Summary

Kodiak Gas Services beats Enerflex on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerflex compare to Cactus?

Enerflex (NYSE:EFXT) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Enerflex currently has a consensus price target of $35.17, suggesting a potential upside of 76.58%. Cactus has a consensus price target of $66.80, suggesting a potential downside of 1.71%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Cactus.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerflex	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Cactus	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enerflex pays out 27.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cactus has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Cactus is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cactus had 13 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Cactus and 6 mentions for Enerflex. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Cactus' score of 0.34 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerflex	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cactus	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Cactus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerflex. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cactus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerflex	$2.57B	0.95	$64M	$0.43	46.31
Cactus	$1.08B	5.05	$166.01M	$1.17	58.09

Cactus has a net margin of 6.01% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 2.06%. Cactus' return on equity of 16.66% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerflex	2.06%	11.76%	4.84%
Cactus	6.01%	16.66%	10.81%

46.5% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.1% of Cactus shares are held by institutional investors. 12.9% of Cactus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cactus beats Enerflex on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Enerflex News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFXT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EFXT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Enerflex	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.44B	$3.69B	$9.85B	$24.21B
Dividend Yield	0.60%	13.37%	11.64%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	46.38	43.65	20.32	30.19
Price / Sales	0.95	32.25	346.79	17.41
Price / Cash	8.10	21.37	36.09	19.80
Price / Book	2.22	2.17	3.94	4.90
Net Income	$64M	$67.81M	$4.33B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-8.39%	-2.18%	0.23%	0.44%
1 Month Performance	-12.59%	1.25%	3.56%	2.79%
1 Year Performance	103.84%	46.48%	36.95%	14.88%

Enerflex Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EFXT Enerflex	4.361 of 5 stars	$19.92 +1.0%	$35.17 +76.6%	+100.2%	$2.44B	$2.57B	46.38	4,400	News Coverage Positive News
NOV NOV	3.4687 of 5 stars	$20.24 -0.1%	$21.31 +5.3%	+50.6%	$7.22B	$8.74B	77.85	31,605	Positive News Dividend Announcement
LB LandBridge	1.7019 of 5 stars	$90.06 +3.5%	$79.20 -12.1%	+61.4%	$6.94B	$199.09M	79.70	6
WFRD Weatherford International	4.8699 of 5 stars	$91.37 +0.1%	$114.25 +25.0%	+45.9%	$6.55B	$4.92B	18.02	16,700
KGS Kodiak Gas Services	4.7282 of 5 stars	$59.53 -1.8%	$78.89 +32.5%	+65.5%	$6.02B	$1.39B	70.87	1,300	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:EFXT) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Enerflex (EFXT) Competitors