Enerflex (EFXT) Competitors

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Weatherford International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Enerflex presently has a consensus target price of $35.33, indicating a potential upside of 46.82%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $110.67, indicating a potential upside of 30.98%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Weatherford International.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Weatherford International has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Weatherford International's return on equity of 28.31% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Weatherford International has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Weatherford International had 1 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Weatherford International and 2 mentions for Enerflex. Weatherford International's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Enerflex's score of 0.00 indicating that Weatherford International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enerflex presently has a consensus price target of $35.33, suggesting a potential upside of 46.82%. Gates Industrial has a consensus price target of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.63%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Gates Industrial.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gates Industrial has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Gates Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Gates Industrial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gates Industrial has a net margin of 7.23% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Enerflex's return on equity of 14.53% beat Gates Industrial's return on equity.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of Gates Industrial shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Gates Industrial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Enerflex had 1 more articles in the media than Gates Industrial. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enerflex and 1 mentions for Gates Industrial. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Gates Industrial's score of -0.33 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JBT Marel has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. JBT Marel pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JBT Marel pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Enerflex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enerflex has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JBT Marel. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JBT Marel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of JBT Marel shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of JBT Marel shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JBT Marel has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Enerflex's return on equity of 14.53% beat JBT Marel's return on equity.

Enerflex currently has a consensus target price of $35.33, suggesting a potential upside of 46.82%. JBT Marel has a consensus target price of $174.67, suggesting a potential upside of 29.42%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than JBT Marel.

In the previous week, Enerflex had 1 more articles in the media than JBT Marel. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enerflex and 1 mentions for JBT Marel. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JBT Marel'saverage media sentiment score.

ESAB has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. ESAB is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enerflex presently has a consensus price target of $35.33, suggesting a potential upside of 46.82%. ESAB has a consensus price target of $138.38, suggesting a potential upside of 42.47%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than ESAB.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of ESAB shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of ESAB shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ESAB has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. ESAB's return on equity of 15.04% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. ESAB pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ESAB pays out 11.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and ESAB has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Enerflex had 1 more articles in the media than ESAB. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enerflex and 1 mentions for ESAB. ESAB's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Enerflex's score of 0.00 indicating that ESAB is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ESAB has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.