Enerflex (EFXT) Competitors

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Enerflex. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

83.3% of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor presently has a consensus price target of $55.33, suggesting a potential upside of 16.06%. Enerflex has a consensus price target of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 51.03%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has a net margin of 12.26% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor's return on equity of 17.40% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor both had 4 articles in the media. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Enerflex's score of 0.46 indicating that Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market.

JBT Marel has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market.

Enerflex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JBT Marel. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JBT Marel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

JBT Marel has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Enerflex's return on equity of 14.53% beat JBT Marel's return on equity.

JBT Marel pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. JBT Marel pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Enerflex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

JBT Marel currently has a consensus target price of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 29.50%. Enerflex has a consensus target price of $36.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.03%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than JBT Marel.

In the previous week, Enerflex had 4 more articles in the media than JBT Marel. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Enerflex and 0 mentions for JBT Marel. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat JBT Marel's score of 0.00 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

98.9% of JBT Marel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of JBT Marel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gates Industrial has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market.

Gates Industrial has a net margin of 7.23% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Enerflex's return on equity of 14.53% beat Gates Industrial's return on equity.

In the previous week, Enerflex had 2 more articles in the media than Gates Industrial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Enerflex and 2 mentions for Gates Industrial. Gates Industrial's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Enerflex's score of 0.46 indicating that Gates Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

98.5% of Gates Industrial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Gates Industrial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gates Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Gates Industrial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gates Industrial currently has a consensus target price of $31.18, suggesting a potential upside of 17.41%. Enerflex has a consensus target price of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 51.03%. Given Enerflex's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Gates Industrial.

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Weatherford International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Weatherford International has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Weatherford International had 9 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Weatherford International and 4 mentions for Enerflex. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Weatherford International's score of 0.35 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Weatherford International has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Weatherford International's return on equity of 28.31% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Enerflex presently has a consensus target price of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 51.03%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $114.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.35%. Given Enerflex's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Weatherford International.