Enerflex (EFXT) Competitors

Moog has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moog, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Moog pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Moog pays out 13.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Enerflex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Enerflex had 2 more articles in the media than Moog. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enerflex and 0 mentions for Moog. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Moog's score of 0.00 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Moog shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Moog shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Enerflex currently has a consensus target price of $35.33, suggesting a potential upside of 36.16%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Moog.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Moog has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Moog has a net margin of 6.83% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Moog's return on equity of 16.11% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerflex. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has a net margin of 12.26% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor's return on equity of 17.40% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enerflex presently has a consensus price target of $35.33, suggesting a potential upside of 36.16%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor has a consensus price target of $54.88, suggesting a potential upside of 15.62%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor.

In the previous week, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor had 3 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor and 2 mentions for Enerflex. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Enerflex's score of 0.45 indicating that Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Cor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Weatherford International had 8 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Weatherford International and 2 mentions for Enerflex. Weatherford International's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Enerflex's score of 0.45 indicating that Weatherford International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Enerflex currently has a consensus price target of $35.33, suggesting a potential upside of 36.16%. Weatherford International has a consensus price target of $110.67, suggesting a potential upside of 6.32%. Given Enerflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Weatherford International.

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Weatherford International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Weatherford International has higher revenue and earnings than Enerflex. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Weatherford International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Weatherford International has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Weatherford International's return on equity of 28.31% beat Enerflex's return on equity.

Enerflex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than JBT Marel. Enerflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JBT Marel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, JBT Marel and JBT Marel both had 2 articles in the media. JBT Marel's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Enerflex's score of 0.45 indicating that JBT Marel is being referred to more favorably in the media.

98.9% of JBT Marel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of JBT Marel shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JBT Marel has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerflex has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market.

JBT Marel pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Enerflex pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. JBT Marel pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerflex pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enerflex has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Enerflex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

JBT Marel currently has a consensus price target of $174.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.47%. Enerflex has a consensus price target of $35.33, suggesting a potential upside of 36.16%. Given JBT Marel's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe JBT Marel is more favorable than Enerflex.

JBT Marel has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Enerflex's net margin of 3.19%. Enerflex's return on equity of 14.53% beat JBT Marel's return on equity.