Go Pro

Energizer (ENR) Competitors

Energizer logo
$21.50 +0.51 (+2.43%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

ENR vs. REYN, WDFC, CENT, CENTA, and SPB

Should you buy Energizer stock or one of its competitors? Energizer's main competitors and comparable companies include Reynolds Consumer Products (REYN), WD-40 (WDFC), Central Garden & Pet (CENT), Central Garden & Pet (CENTA), and Spectrum Brands (SPB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household products" industry.

How does Energizer compare to Reynolds Consumer Products?

Energizer (NYSE:ENR) and Reynolds Consumer Products (NASDAQ:REYN) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Reynolds Consumer Products has higher revenue and earnings than Energizer. Reynolds Consumer Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energizer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energizer$2.95B0.50$239M$1.1818.22
Reynolds Consumer Products$3.72B1.44$301M$1.6415.53

Energizer has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Reynolds Consumer Products has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

93.7% of Energizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Reynolds Consumer Products shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Energizer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Reynolds Consumer Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Reynolds Consumer Products has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Energizer's net margin of 2.73%. Energizer's return on equity of 122.63% beat Reynolds Consumer Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energizer2.73% 122.63% 4.72%
Reynolds Consumer Products 9.11%16.03%7.28%

In the previous week, Energizer had 16 more articles in the media than Reynolds Consumer Products. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energizer and 3 mentions for Reynolds Consumer Products. Reynolds Consumer Products' average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat Energizer's score of -0.14 indicating that Reynolds Consumer Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energizer
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Reynolds Consumer Products
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Energizer currently has a consensus target price of $21.83, indicating a potential upside of 1.55%. Reynolds Consumer Products has a consensus target price of $25.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.51%. Given Energizer's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Energizer is more favorable than Reynolds Consumer Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energizer
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Reynolds Consumer Products
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Energizer pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Reynolds Consumer Products pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Energizer pays out 101.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Reynolds Consumer Products pays out 56.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Reynolds Consumer Products beats Energizer on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energizer compare to WD-40?

Energizer (NYSE:ENR) and WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Energizer currently has a consensus target price of $21.83, indicating a potential upside of 1.55%. WD-40 has a consensus target price of $305.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.50%. Given WD-40's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe WD-40 is more favorable than Energizer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energizer
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
WD-40
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Energizer has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WD-40 has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energizer had 12 more articles in the media than WD-40. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energizer and 7 mentions for WD-40. WD-40's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Energizer's score of -0.14 indicating that WD-40 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energizer
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
WD-40
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Energizer has higher revenue and earnings than WD-40. Energizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WD-40, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energizer$2.95B0.50$239M$1.1818.22
WD-40$619.98M4.70$90.99M$6.5832.99

93.7% of Energizer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of WD-40 shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Energizer shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of WD-40 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Energizer pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. WD-40 pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Energizer pays out 101.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WD-40 pays out 62.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WD-40 has raised its dividend for 17 consecutive years.

WD-40 has a net margin of 13.23% compared to Energizer's net margin of 2.73%. Energizer's return on equity of 122.63% beat WD-40's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energizer2.73% 122.63% 4.72%
WD-40 13.23%33.53%18.97%

Summary

WD-40 beats Energizer on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energizer compare to Central Garden & Pet?

Energizer (NYSE:ENR) and Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENT) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Energizer had 6 more articles in the media than Central Garden & Pet. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energizer and 13 mentions for Central Garden & Pet. Central Garden & Pet's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Energizer's score of -0.14 indicating that Central Garden & Pet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energizer
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Central Garden & Pet
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

93.7% of Energizer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.1% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Energizer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Central Garden & Pet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energizer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Central Garden & Pet. Central Garden & Pet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energizer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energizer$2.95B0.50$239M$1.1818.22
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.89$162.84M$2.6816.57

Energizer has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Energizer currently has a consensus target price of $21.83, suggesting a potential upside of 1.55%. Central Garden & Pet has a consensus target price of $54.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.62%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Energizer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energizer
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Central Garden & Pet
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 5.39% compared to Energizer's net margin of 2.73%. Energizer's return on equity of 122.63% beat Central Garden & Pet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energizer2.73% 122.63% 4.72%
Central Garden & Pet 5.39%11.13%4.93%

Summary

Central Garden & Pet beats Energizer on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energizer compare to Central Garden & Pet?

Energizer (NYSE:ENR) and Central Garden & Pet (NASDAQ:CENTA) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 5.39% compared to Energizer's net margin of 2.73%. Energizer's return on equity of 122.63% beat Central Garden & Pet's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energizer2.73% 122.63% 4.72%
Central Garden & Pet 5.39%11.13%4.93%

93.7% of Energizer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Energizer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.3% of Central Garden & Pet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Energizer had 5 more articles in the media than Central Garden & Pet. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energizer and 14 mentions for Central Garden & Pet. Central Garden & Pet's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Energizer's score of -0.14 indicating that Central Garden & Pet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energizer
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Central Garden & Pet
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Energizer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Central Garden & Pet. Central Garden & Pet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energizer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energizer$2.95B0.50$239M$1.1818.22
Central Garden & Pet$3.13B0.77$162.84M$2.6814.34

Energizer currently has a consensus target price of $21.83, suggesting a potential upside of 1.55%. Central Garden & Pet has a consensus target price of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 21.43%. Given Central Garden & Pet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Central Garden & Pet is more favorable than Energizer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energizer
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Central Garden & Pet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Energizer has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Central Garden & Pet beats Energizer on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energizer compare to Spectrum Brands?

Energizer (NYSE:ENR) and Spectrum Brands (NYSE:SPB) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Energizer had 13 more articles in the media than Spectrum Brands. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Energizer and 6 mentions for Spectrum Brands. Spectrum Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat Energizer's score of -0.14 indicating that Spectrum Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Energizer
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Spectrum Brands
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Spectrum Brands has a net margin of 2.76% compared to Energizer's net margin of 2.73%. Energizer's return on equity of 122.63% beat Spectrum Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Energizer2.73% 122.63% 4.72%
Spectrum Brands 2.76%10.06%5.49%

Energizer has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Spectrum Brands has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Energizer presently has a consensus price target of $21.83, suggesting a potential upside of 1.55%. Spectrum Brands has a consensus price target of $98.83, suggesting a potential upside of 13.69%. Given Spectrum Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Spectrum Brands is more favorable than Energizer.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Energizer
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
Spectrum Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Energizer pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Spectrum Brands pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Energizer pays out 101.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Spectrum Brands pays out 57.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Spectrum Brands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

93.7% of Energizer shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Energizer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Spectrum Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Energizer has higher revenue and earnings than Spectrum Brands. Energizer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Spectrum Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Energizer$2.95B0.50$239M$1.1818.22
Spectrum Brands$2.81B0.71$99.70M$3.2826.50

Summary

Spectrum Brands beats Energizer on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energizer News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ENR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ENR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ENR vs. The Competition

MetricEnergizerHousehold Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.47B$10.42B$15.97B$24.30B
Dividend Yield5.59%2.71%3.21%3.70%
P/E Ratio18.2214.2013.5830.23
Price / Sales0.504,480,852.59262,949.3121.05
Price / Cash3.8015.2556.1919.80
Price / Book8.6313.904.984.90
Net Income$239M$552.50M$836.78M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.57%-0.20%0.26%-0.65%
1 Month Performance4.19%2.19%2.22%3.38%
1 Year Performance-24.89%2.36%13.47%14.90%

Energizer Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ENR
Energizer
2.2673 of 5 stars
$21.50
+2.4%
$21.83
+1.6%
-24.9%$1.47B$2.95B18.226,050
REYN
Reynolds Consumer Products
2.9933 of 5 stars
$25.91
-1.3%
$25.60
-1.2%
+8.8%$5.53B$3.79B15.806,000
WDFC
WD-40
4.7194 of 5 stars
$229.01
-0.1%
$305.00
+33.2%
-2.5%$3.08B$619.98M34.80580
CENT
Central Garden & Pet
3.8613 of 5 stars
$43.35
-0.9%
$54.00
+24.6%
+21.2%$2.74B$3.13B16.186,000
CENTA
Central Garden & Pet
3.8155 of 5 stars
$37.64
-0.6%
$46.67
+24.0%
+15.8%$2.37B$3.13B14.047,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ENR) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners