Federated Hermes (FHI) Competitors

Franklin Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Franklin Resources pays out 89.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federated Hermes pays out 28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franklin Resources has raised its dividend for 45 consecutive years and Federated Hermes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Franklin Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Franklin Resources presently has a consensus price target of $35.89, indicating a potential upside of 17.50%. Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $57.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.38%. Given Franklin Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Franklin Resources is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 21.30% compared to Franklin Resources' net margin of 8.72%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 34.03% beat Franklin Resources' return on equity.

Franklin Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Franklin Resources had 13 more articles in the media than Federated Hermes. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Franklin Resources and 9 mentions for Federated Hermes. Franklin Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Federated Hermes' score of 0.31 indicating that Franklin Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Franklin Resources has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

47.6% of Franklin Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Franklin Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Federated Hermes currently has a consensus price target of $57.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.38%. Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $13.36, indicating a potential upside of 51.89%. Given Blue Owl Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 21.30% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 2.71%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 34.03% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity.

Federated Hermes has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Blue Owl Capital. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Federated Hermes had 3 more articles in the media than Blue Owl Capital. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Federated Hermes and 6 mentions for Blue Owl Capital. Federated Hermes' average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Blue Owl Capital's score of 0.27 indicating that Federated Hermes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.9% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.7% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.5%. Federated Hermes pays out 28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blue Owl Capital pays out 766.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federated Hermes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Blue Owl Capital has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 21.30% compared to Carlyle Group's net margin of 10.08%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 34.03% beat Carlyle Group's return on equity.

55.9% of Carlyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. 25.4% of Carlyle Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carlyle Group currently has a consensus target price of $55.40, indicating a potential upside of 54.88%. Federated Hermes has a consensus target price of $57.80, indicating a potential upside of 5.38%. Given Carlyle Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Carlyle Group is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

In the previous week, Carlyle Group had 6 more articles in the media than Federated Hermes. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Carlyle Group and 9 mentions for Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes' average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Carlyle Group's score of 0.02 indicating that Federated Hermes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Carlyle Group has higher revenue and earnings than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Carlyle Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Carlyle Group pays out 145.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federated Hermes pays out 28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carlyle Group has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Federated Hermes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Ares Capital presently has a consensus target price of $20.39, suggesting a potential upside of 7.68%. Federated Hermes has a consensus target price of $57.80, suggesting a potential upside of 2.41%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 5 more articles in the media than Federated Hermes. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Ares Capital and 10 mentions for Federated Hermes. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Federated Hermes' score of 0.23 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ares Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federated Hermes pays out 28.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federated Hermes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 30.91% compared to Federated Hermes' net margin of 21.30%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 34.03% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.