Federated Hermes Competitors

Morningstar (NASDAQ:MORN) and Federated Hermes (NYSE:FHI) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Morningstar and Federated Hermes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

47.5% of Morningstar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. 49.7% of Morningstar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Morningstar and Federated Hermes, as reported by MarketBeat.

Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.26%. Given Federated Hermes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Federated Hermes is more favorable than Morningstar.

Volatility and Risk

Morningstar has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Morningstar pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Federated Hermes pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Morningstar has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Morningstar and Federated Hermes' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Federated Hermes has higher revenue and earnings than Morningstar.

Summary

Federated Hermes beats Morningstar on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE:AMG) and Federated Hermes (NYSE:FHI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and Federated Hermes' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Federated Hermes has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Affiliated Managers Group. Affiliated Managers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Federated Hermes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and Federated Hermes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Affiliated Managers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Affiliated Managers Group pays out 0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Affiliated Managers Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.8% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Affiliated Managers Group and Federated Hermes, as reported by MarketBeat.

Affiliated Managers Group currently has a consensus price target of $133.60, indicating a potential downside of 13.72%. Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.26%. Given Federated Hermes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Federated Hermes is more favorable than Affiliated Managers Group.

Summary

Affiliated Managers Group beats Federated Hermes on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Evercore (NYSE:EVR) and Federated Hermes (NYSE:FHI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Dividends

Evercore pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Evercore pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Evercore has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Evercore and Federated Hermes' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Evercore has higher revenue and earnings than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evercore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Evercore and Federated Hermes, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Evercore currently has a consensus price target of $138.7778, indicating a potential upside of 2.31%. Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.26%. Given Evercore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Evercore is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.8% of Evercore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.1% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Evercore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Evercore and Federated Hermes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Evercore has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Evercore beats Federated Hermes on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Federated Hermes (NYSE:FHI) and Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Janus Henderson Group pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Federated Hermes pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Janus Henderson Group pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Janus Henderson Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Janus Henderson Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Federated Hermes and Janus Henderson Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Janus Henderson Group has higher revenue and earnings than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Janus Henderson Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Federated Hermes and Janus Henderson Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Federated Hermes currently has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.26%. Janus Henderson Group has a consensus price target of $25.1286, indicating a potential downside of 23.27%. Given Federated Hermes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Federated Hermes is more favorable than Janus Henderson Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.1% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Federated Hermes and Janus Henderson Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Janus Henderson Group has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Federated Hermes beats Janus Henderson Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Federated Hermes (NYSE:FHI) and Lazard (NYSE:LAZ) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Lazard pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Federated Hermes pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lazard pays out 57.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lazard has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lazard is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Federated Hermes and Lazard's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lazard has higher revenue and earnings than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lazard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Federated Hermes and Lazard, as provided by MarketBeat.

Federated Hermes currently has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.26%. Lazard has a consensus price target of $42.6667, indicating a potential downside of 6.35%. Given Federated Hermes' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Federated Hermes is more favorable than Lazard.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.1% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Lazard shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Lazard shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Federated Hermes and Lazard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lazard has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Lazard beats Federated Hermes on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Federated Hermes (NYSE:FHI) and Hamilton Lane (NASDAQ:HLNE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Federated Hermes and Hamilton Lane, as provided by MarketBeat.

Federated Hermes currently has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.26%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $87.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.94%. Given Hamilton Lane's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hamilton Lane is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

Profitability

This table compares Federated Hermes and Hamilton Lane's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.1% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Hamilton Lane shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Hamilton Lane shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Hamilton Lane pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Federated Hermes pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hamilton Lane pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hamilton Lane has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Federated Hermes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Federated Hermes and Hamilton Lane's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Federated Hermes has higher revenue and earnings than Hamilton Lane. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamilton Lane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Federated Hermes has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hamilton Lane beats Federated Hermes on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.