Federated Hermes (FHI) Competitors

W.P. Carey has a net margin of 29.35% compared to Federated Hermes' net margin of 21.47%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 33.90% beat W.P. Carey's return on equity.

75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.7% of W.P. Carey shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of W.P. Carey shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

W.P. Carey has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than W.P. Carey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, W.P. Carey has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. W.P. Carey pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Federated Hermes pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. W.P. Carey pays out 159.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federated Hermes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and W.P. Carey has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Federated Hermes currently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.09%. W.P. Carey has a consensus price target of $73.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.25%. Given W.P. Carey's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe W.P. Carey is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

In the previous week, Federated Hermes had 5 more articles in the media than W.P. Carey. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Federated Hermes and 19 mentions for W.P. Carey. W.P. Carey's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Federated Hermes' score of 0.59 indicating that W.P. Carey is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 21.47% compared to Blue Owl Capital's net margin of 2.96%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 33.90% beat Blue Owl Capital's return on equity.

75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.7% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Federated Hermes has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Blue Owl Capital. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Blue Owl Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Federated Hermes pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Blue Owl Capital pays out 766.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federated Hermes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Blue Owl Capital has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Federated Hermes currently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.09%. Blue Owl Capital has a consensus price target of $15.03, indicating a potential upside of 39.89%. Given Blue Owl Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

In the previous week, Blue Owl Capital had 25 more articles in the media than Federated Hermes. MarketBeat recorded 49 mentions for Blue Owl Capital and 24 mentions for Federated Hermes. Blue Owl Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Federated Hermes' score of 0.59 indicating that Blue Owl Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federated Hermes has a net margin of 21.47% compared to Host Hotels & Resorts' net margin of 12.51%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 33.90% beat Host Hotels & Resorts' return on equity.

Host Hotels & Resorts presently has a consensus price target of $21.38, indicating a potential upside of 0.35%. Federated Hermes has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.09%. Given Host Hotels & Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Host Hotels & Resorts is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

Host Hotels & Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Host Hotels & Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Host Hotels & Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Host Hotels & Resorts has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Federated Hermes had 16 more articles in the media than Host Hotels & Resorts. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Federated Hermes and 8 mentions for Host Hotels & Resorts. Host Hotels & Resorts' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Federated Hermes' score of 0.59 indicating that Host Hotels & Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Host Hotels & Resorts pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Host Hotels & Resorts pays out 72.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federated Hermes pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Host Hotels & Resorts has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Federated Hermes has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $3.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Federated Hermes pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Regency Centers pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federated Hermes pays out 26.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regency Centers has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Federated Hermes has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Regency Centers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Regency Centers has a net margin of 34.47% compared to Federated Hermes' net margin of 21.47%. Federated Hermes' return on equity of 33.90% beat Regency Centers' return on equity.

Regency Centers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regency Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Regency Centers has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federated Hermes has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Regency Centers currently has a consensus target price of $81.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.67%. Federated Hermes has a consensus target price of $54.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.09%. Given Regency Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Regency Centers is more favorable than Federated Hermes.

In the previous week, Regency Centers had 3 more articles in the media than Federated Hermes. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Regency Centers and 24 mentions for Federated Hermes. Federated Hermes' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Regency Centers' score of 0.43 indicating that Federated Hermes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

96.1% of Regency Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Federated Hermes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.