Go Pro

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS logo
$10.37 +0.10 (+1.01%)
As of 03:44 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FIGS vs. ZGN, KTB, BRP, UAA, and UA

Should you buy FIGS stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FIGS with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FIGS include Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN), Kontoor Brands (KTB), The Baldwin Insurance Group (BRP), Under Armour (UAA), and Under Armour (UA). These companies are all part of the "apparel" industry.

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Ermenegildo Zegna (NYSE:ZGN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FIGS$666.10M2.60$34.25M$0.2247.15
Ermenegildo Zegna$2.17B2.64$111.54MN/AN/A

FIGS presently has a consensus target price of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 53.54%. Ermenegildo Zegna has a consensus target price of $13.01, suggesting a potential downside of 3.94%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Ermenegildo Zegna.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Ermenegildo Zegna
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.9% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ermenegildo Zegna had 3 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna and 0 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.74 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FIGS Positive
Ermenegildo Zegna Positive

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Ermenegildo Zegna's net margin of 0.00%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Ermenegildo Zegna's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FIGS6.10% 9.69% 7.37%
Ermenegildo Zegna N/A N/A N/A

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ermenegildo Zegna has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FIGS beats Ermenegildo Zegna on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

Kontoor Brands (NYSE:KTB) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both apparel companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Kontoor Brands had 2 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Kontoor Brands and 0 mentions for FIGS. Kontoor Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat FIGS's score of 0.99 indicating that Kontoor Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kontoor Brands Positive
FIGS Positive

93.1% of Kontoor Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Kontoor Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kontoor Brands currently has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential upside of 7.37%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 53.54%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Kontoor Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kontoor Brands
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kontoor Brands8.30% 60.17% 12.31%
FIGS 6.10%9.69%7.37%

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kontoor Brands$3.34B1.40$227.45M$4.9417.19
FIGS$666.10M2.60$34.25M$0.2247.15

Kontoor Brands has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kontoor Brands beats FIGS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and The Baldwin Insurance Group (NASDAQ:BRP) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Baldwin Insurance Group. The Baldwin Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FIGS$666.10M2.60$34.25M$0.2247.15
The Baldwin Insurance Group$1.27B2.49-$90.14M-$0.92N/A

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.4% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -4.29%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FIGS6.10% 9.69% 7.37%
The Baldwin Insurance Group -4.29%9.21%2.82%

In the previous week, FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FIGS Positive
The Baldwin Insurance Group Neutral

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

FIGS presently has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 53.54%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
The Baldwin Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

FIGS beats The Baldwin Insurance Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS presently has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 53.54%. Under Armour has a consensus price target of $5.91, suggesting a potential downside of 10.93%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Under Armour
4 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.95

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FIGS$666.10M2.60$34.25M$0.2247.15
Under Armour$4.97B0.57-$495.64M-$1.16N/A

In the previous week, Under Armour had 5 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Under Armour and 0 mentions for FIGS. Under Armour's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat FIGS's score of 0.99 indicating that Under Armour is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FIGS Positive
Under Armour Positive

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FIGS6.10% 9.69% 7.37%
Under Armour -9.98%3.01%1.05%

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Under Armour (NYSE:UA) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both apparel companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

FIGS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Under Armour$4.97B0.56-$495.64M-$1.16N/A
FIGS$666.10M2.60$34.25M$0.2247.15

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Under Armour-9.98% 3.01% 1.05%
FIGS 6.10%9.69%7.37%

36.4% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Under Armour had 4 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Under Armour and 0 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Under Armour's score of 0.47 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Under Armour Neutral
FIGS Positive

Under Armour has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Under Armour currently has a consensus price target of $5.50, indicating a potential downside of 14.94%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 53.54%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Under Armour
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FIGS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FIGS vs. The Competition

MetricFIGSRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.73B$10.05B$26.69B$23.43B
Dividend YieldN/A3.19%175.39%4.01%
P/E Ratio47.1015.4820.6731.24
Price / Sales2.601.054.0183.98
Price / Cash41.5112.0617.6725.14
Price / Book3.934.346.334.78
Net Income$34.25M$378.06M$951.26M$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.76%-0.43%-1.98%-0.45%
1 Month Performance-10.77%-2.03%0.79%1.51%
1 Year Performance77.94%15.75%-4.56%16.68%

FIGS Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FIGS
FIGS
4.1286 of 5 stars
$10.37
+1.0%
$15.93
+53.5%
+76.6%$1.73B$666.10M47.10310
ZGN
Ermenegildo Zegna
3.4773 of 5 stars
$12.85
-2.3%
$12.68
-1.3%
+46.7%$5.57B$1.92BN/A7,437
KTB
Kontoor Brands
4.0144 of 5 stars
$81.89
-1.7%
$91.20
+11.4%
+18.5%$4.60B$3.15B16.5810,600
BRP
The Baldwin Insurance Group
N/A$26.22
+9.2%
N/A-31.5%$3.08B$1.27BN/A9,200
UAA
Under Armour
2.7982 of 5 stars
$6.16
-2.3%
$5.91
-4.0%
-7.1%$2.69B$4.97BN/A14,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 7/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners