Which has higher valuation & earnings, FIGS or VSXY?

Victoria's Secret & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. FIGS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victoria's Secret & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 3.81 $34.25M $0.33 43.85 Victoria's Secret & Co. $6.55B 1.07 $161M $1.86 47.40

Does the media favor FIGS or VSXY?

In the previous week, Victoria's Secret & Co. had 4 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Victoria's Secret & Co. and 4 mentions for FIGS. Victoria's Secret & Co.'s average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat FIGS's score of 0.63 indicating that Victoria's Secret & Co. is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Victoria's Secret & Co. 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GAP or FIGS?

GAP has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. GAP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio GAP $15.37B 0.47 $816M $2.54 7.91 FIGS $631.10M 3.81 $34.25M $0.33 43.85

Is GAP or FIGS more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to GAP's net margin of 6.25%. GAP's return on equity of 21.13% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets GAP 6.25% 21.13% 6.23% FIGS 8.72% 12.53% 9.52%

Does the media refer more to GAP or FIGS?

In the previous week, GAP had 7 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for GAP and 4 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat GAP's score of -0.09 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment GAP 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FIGS 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FIGS or URBN?

Urban Outfitters has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Urban Outfitters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 3.81 $34.25M $0.33 43.85 Urban Outfitters $6.17B 1.03 $464.92M $5.21 14.28

Is FIGS or URBN more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to Urban Outfitters' net margin of 7.48%. Urban Outfitters' return on equity of 18.92% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 8.72% 12.53% 9.52% Urban Outfitters 7.48% 18.92% 10.45%

Does the media refer more to FIGS or URBN?

In the previous week, Urban Outfitters had 10 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Urban Outfitters and 4 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Urban Outfitters' score of 0.58 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Urban Outfitters 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, ANF or FIGS?

Abercrombie & Fitch has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Abercrombie & Fitch is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Abercrombie & Fitch $5.27B 0.89 $506.92M $10.42 10.13 FIGS $631.10M 3.81 $34.25M $0.33 43.85

Is ANF or FIGS more profitable?

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 9.34% compared to FIGS's net margin of 8.72%. Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 34.36% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Abercrombie & Fitch 9.34% 34.36% 13.50% FIGS 8.72% 12.53% 9.52%

Does the media refer more to ANF or FIGS?

In the previous week, Abercrombie & Fitch had 13 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Abercrombie & Fitch and 4 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Abercrombie & Fitch's score of 0.37 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Abercrombie & Fitch 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FIGS 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BOOT or FIGS?

Boot Barn has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Boot Barn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Boot Barn $2.25B 2.27 $225.88M $7.90 21.35 FIGS $631.10M 3.81 $34.25M $0.33 43.85

Is BOOT or FIGS more profitable?

Boot Barn has a net margin of 10.35% compared to FIGS's net margin of 8.72%. Boot Barn's return on equity of 18.78% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Boot Barn 10.35% 18.78% 10.03% FIGS 8.72% 12.53% 9.52%

Does the media favor BOOT or FIGS?

In the previous week, Boot Barn had 2 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Boot Barn and 4 mentions for FIGS. Boot Barn's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat FIGS's score of 0.63 indicating that Boot Barn is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Boot Barn 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FIGS 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

$14.47 +0.31 (+2.20%)

Closing price 08/19/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$14.38 -0.09 (-0.65%)

As of 09:25 AM Eastern

Compare

FIGS vs. VSXY, GAP, URBN, ANF, and BOOT

Should you buy FIGS stock or one of its competitors? FIGS's main competitors and comparable companies include Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSXY), GAP (GAP), Urban Outfitters (URBN), Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF), and Boot Barn (BOOT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does FIGS compare to Victoria's Secret & Co.?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Victoria's Secret & Co. (NYSE:VSXY) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Victoria's Secret & Co. had 4 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Victoria's Secret & Co. and 4 mentions for FIGS. Victoria's Secret & Co.'s average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat FIGS's score of 0.63 indicating that Victoria's Secret & Co. is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Victoria's Secret & Co.	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

FIGS presently has a consensus target price of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 29.31%. Victoria's Secret & Co. has a consensus target price of $89.70, suggesting a potential upside of 1.75%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Victoria's Secret & Co..

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Victoria's Secret & Co.	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62

Victoria's Secret & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. FIGS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victoria's Secret & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	3.81	$34.25M	$0.33	43.85
Victoria's Secret & Co.	$6.55B	1.07	$161M	$1.86	47.40

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Victoria's Secret & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Victoria's Secret & Co. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to Victoria's Secret & Co.'s net margin of 3.11%. Victoria's Secret & Co.'s return on equity of 38.03% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	8.72%	12.53%	9.52%
Victoria's Secret & Co.	3.11%	38.03%	6.10%

FIGS has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria's Secret & Co. has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Victoria's Secret & Co. beats FIGS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to GAP?

GAP (NYSE:GAP) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

GAP currently has a consensus price target of $26.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.87%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $18.71, indicating a potential upside of 29.31%. Given GAP's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe GAP is more favorable than FIGS.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
GAP	0 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

FIGS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to GAP's net margin of 6.25%. GAP's return on equity of 21.13% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
GAP	6.25%	21.13%	6.23%
FIGS	8.72%	12.53%	9.52%

GAP has a beta of 2.05, meaning that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

58.8% of GAP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 31.0% of GAP shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

GAP has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. GAP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
GAP	$15.37B	0.47	$816M	$2.54	7.91
FIGS	$631.10M	3.81	$34.25M	$0.33	43.85

In the previous week, GAP had 7 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for GAP and 4 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat GAP's score of -0.09 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
GAP	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FIGS	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

GAP beats FIGS on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Urban Outfitters?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Urban Outfitters (NASDAQ:URBN) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Urban Outfitters has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Urban Outfitters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	3.81	$34.25M	$0.33	43.85
Urban Outfitters	$6.17B	1.03	$464.92M	$5.21	14.28

FIGS has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

FIGS currently has a consensus target price of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 29.31%. Urban Outfitters has a consensus target price of $89.73, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Urban Outfitters.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Urban Outfitters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

In the previous week, Urban Outfitters had 10 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Urban Outfitters and 4 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Urban Outfitters' score of 0.58 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Urban Outfitters	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.6% of Urban Outfitters shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 32.1% of Urban Outfitters shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FIGS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to Urban Outfitters' net margin of 7.48%. Urban Outfitters' return on equity of 18.92% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	8.72%	12.53%	9.52%
Urban Outfitters	7.48%	18.92%	10.45%

Summary

Urban Outfitters beats FIGS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Abercrombie & Fitch?

Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE:ANF) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 9.34% compared to FIGS's net margin of 8.72%. Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 34.36% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Abercrombie & Fitch	9.34%	34.36%	13.50%
FIGS	8.72%	12.53%	9.52%

Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Abercrombie & Fitch has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Abercrombie & Fitch is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Abercrombie & Fitch	$5.27B	0.89	$506.92M	$10.42	10.13
FIGS	$631.10M	3.81	$34.25M	$0.33	43.85

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Abercrombie & Fitch shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Abercrombie & Fitch presently has a consensus target price of $119.27, suggesting a potential upside of 12.98%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 29.31%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Abercrombie & Fitch.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Abercrombie & Fitch	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.54
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

In the previous week, Abercrombie & Fitch had 13 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Abercrombie & Fitch and 4 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Abercrombie & Fitch's score of 0.37 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Abercrombie & Fitch	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FIGS	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Abercrombie & Fitch and FIGS tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Boot Barn?

Boot Barn (NYSE:BOOT) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Boot Barn has a net margin of 10.35% compared to FIGS's net margin of 8.72%. Boot Barn's return on equity of 18.78% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Boot Barn	10.35%	18.78%	10.03%
FIGS	8.72%	12.53%	9.52%

Boot Barn has a beta of 1.71, meaning that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Boot Barn shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Boot Barn has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Boot Barn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Boot Barn	$2.25B	2.27	$225.88M	$7.90	21.35
FIGS	$631.10M	3.81	$34.25M	$0.33	43.85

In the previous week, Boot Barn had 2 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Boot Barn and 4 mentions for FIGS. Boot Barn's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat FIGS's score of 0.63 indicating that Boot Barn is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Boot Barn	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FIGS	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Boot Barn presently has a consensus price target of $219.55, suggesting a potential upside of 30.19%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 29.31%. Given Boot Barn's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Boot Barn is more favorable than FIGS.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Boot Barn	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Summary

Boot Barn beats FIGS on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FIGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FIGS	Specialty Retail Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.35B	$11.42B	$13.02B	$24.19B
Dividend Yield	N/A	106.01%	54.44%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	43.85	27.13	46.95	30.14
Price / Sales	3.81	18.80	95.58	19.93
Price / Cash	59.36	13.50	26.18	31.97
Price / Book	5.44	5.69	4.00	6.84
Net Income	$34.25M	$438.66M	$446.21M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.45%	-0.65%	-0.23%	-0.57%
1 Month Performance	41.66%	2.11%	1.31%	2.97%
1 Year Performance	103.12%	-0.54%	0.20%	18.26%

FIGS Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FIGS FIGS	3.3756 of 5 stars	$14.47 +2.2%	$18.71 +29.3%	+104.3%	$2.35B	$631.10M	43.85	310
VSXY Victoria's Secret & Co.	3.5994 of 5 stars	$99.77 +1.2%	$88.70 -11.1%	+293.2%	$7.83B	$6.55B	53.64	33,000	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
GAP GAP	4.5569 of 5 stars	$21.47 +4.9%	$27.57 +28.4%	-2.9%	$7.37B	$15.37B	8.45	79,000	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
URBN Urban Outfitters	4.0818 of 5 stars	$79.49 +3.3%	$87.91 +10.6%	-1.3%	$6.59B	$6.17B	15.26	31,000	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch	4.1844 of 5 stars	$118.16 +4.9%	$111.91 -5.3%	+11.2%	$5.00B	$5.27B	11.34	43,200	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS vs. VSXY, GAP, URBN, ANF, and BOOT

How does FIGS compare to Victoria's Secret & Co.?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to GAP?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Urban Outfitters?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Abercrombie & Fitch?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Boot Barn?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FIGS vs. The Competition

FIGS Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS vs. VSXY, GAP, URBN, ANF, and BOOT

How does FIGS compare to Victoria's Secret & Co.?

Does the media favor FIGS or VSXY?

Do analysts recommend FIGS or VSXY?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, FIGS or VSXY?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FIGS or VSXY?

Is FIGS or VSXY more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, FIGS or VSXY?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to GAP?

Do analysts prefer GAP or FIGS?

Is GAP or FIGS more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, GAP or FIGS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GAP or FIGS?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GAP or FIGS?

Does the media refer more to GAP or FIGS?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Urban Outfitters?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FIGS or URBN?

Which has more risk & volatility, FIGS or URBN?

Do analysts recommend FIGS or URBN?

Does the media refer more to FIGS or URBN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FIGS or URBN?

Is FIGS or URBN more profitable?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Abercrombie & Fitch?

Is ANF or FIGS more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, ANF or FIGS?

Which has better valuation and earnings, ANF or FIGS?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ANF or FIGS?

Do analysts rate ANF or FIGS?

Does the media refer more to ANF or FIGS?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Boot Barn?

Is BOOT or FIGS more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, BOOT or FIGS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BOOT or FIGS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, BOOT or FIGS?

Does the media favor BOOT or FIGS?

Do analysts prefer BOOT or FIGS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FIGS vs. The Competition

FIGS Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools