Free Trial

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS logo
$11.67 -3.70 (-24.09%)
Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.68 +0.02 (+0.14%)
As of 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FIGS vs. LEVI, BIRK, ZGN, KTB, and UAA

Should you be buying FIGS stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of FIGS include Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI), Birkenstock (BIRK), Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN), Kontoor Brands (KTB), and Under Armour (UAA). These companies are all part of the "apparel" industry.

How does FIGS compare to Levi Strauss & Co.?

Levi Strauss & Co. (NYSE:LEVI) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a net margin of 9.52% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Levi Strauss & Co.'s return on equity of 25.35% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Levi Strauss & Co.9.52% 25.35% 8.32%
FIGS 6.10%9.77%7.43%

Levi Strauss & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Levi Strauss & Co. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Levi Strauss & Co.$6.28B1.39$578.10M$1.5714.43
FIGS$631.10M3.08$34.25M$0.2253.04

69.1% of Levi Strauss & Co. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Levi Strauss & Co. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Levi Strauss & Co. presently has a consensus price target of $26.69, suggesting a potential upside of 17.82%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 36.52%. Given FIGS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Levi Strauss & Co..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Levi Strauss & Co.
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

In the previous week, FIGS had 15 more articles in the media than Levi Strauss & Co.. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for FIGS and 5 mentions for Levi Strauss & Co.. Levi Strauss & Co.'s average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat FIGS's score of 0.57 indicating that Levi Strauss & Co. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Levi Strauss & Co.
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FIGS
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Levi Strauss & Co. beats FIGS on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Birkenstock?

Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap apparel companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Birkenstock currently has a consensus target price of $59.71, suggesting a potential upside of 51.58%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 36.52%. Given Birkenstock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Birkenstock is more favorable than FIGS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birkenstock
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.84
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Birkenstock has a net margin of 17.68% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Birkenstock's return on equity of 13.41% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birkenstock17.68% 13.41% 7.39%
FIGS 6.10%9.77%7.43%

Birkenstock has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Birkenstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birkenstock$2.32B3.12$385.46M$2.2817.28
FIGS$631.10M3.08$34.25M$0.2253.04

Birkenstock has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

19.9% of Birkenstock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 29.4% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, FIGS had 7 more articles in the media than Birkenstock. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for FIGS and 13 mentions for Birkenstock. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.36 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Birkenstock
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FIGS
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Birkenstock beats FIGS on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

Ermenegildo Zegna (NYSE:ZGN) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Ermenegildo Zegna's net margin of 0.00%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.77% beat Ermenegildo Zegna's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ermenegildo ZegnaN/A N/A N/A
FIGS 6.10%9.77%7.43%

Ermenegildo Zegna has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, FIGS had 13 more articles in the media than Ermenegildo Zegna. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for FIGS and 7 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.07 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ermenegildo Zegna
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FIGS
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ermenegildo Zegna$1.92B2.92$111.54MN/AN/A
FIGS$631.10M3.08$34.25M$0.2253.04

Ermenegildo Zegna currently has a consensus target price of $12.26, suggesting a potential downside of 7.14%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 36.52%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Ermenegildo Zegna.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ermenegildo Zegna
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

12.9% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

FIGS beats Ermenegildo Zegna on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

Kontoor Brands (NYSE:KTB) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap apparel companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kontoor Brands$3.15B1.29$227.45M$4.9414.87
FIGS$631.10M3.08$34.25M$0.2253.04

Kontoor Brands currently has a consensus target price of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.86%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 36.52%. Given FIGS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Kontoor Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kontoor Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.81% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 55.20% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kontoor Brands8.81% 55.20% 11.29%
FIGS 6.10%9.77%7.43%

93.1% of Kontoor Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Kontoor Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kontoor Brands has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, FIGS had 7 more articles in the media than Kontoor Brands. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for FIGS and 13 mentions for Kontoor Brands. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Kontoor Brands' score of 0.45 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kontoor Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FIGS
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Kontoor Brands beats FIGS on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) are both mid-cap apparel companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

FIGS has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.4% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FIGS presently has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 36.52%. Under Armour has a consensus target price of $6.91, indicating a potential upside of 7.58%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Under Armour
4 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -10.44%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.77% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FIGS6.10% 9.77% 7.43%
Under Armour -10.44%1.48%0.56%

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FIGS$631.10M3.08$34.25M$0.2253.04
Under Armour$5.16B0.53-$201.27M-$1.22N/A

In the previous week, FIGS had 18 more articles in the media than Under Armour. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for FIGS and 2 mentions for Under Armour. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Under Armour's score of 0.27 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FIGS
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Under Armour
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FIGS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FIGS vs. The Competition

MetricFIGSRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.56B$10.11B$28.07B$22.98B
Dividend YieldN/A2.84%178.37%4.01%
P/E Ratio53.0416.9517.2628.64
Price / Sales3.081.162.20110.84
Price / Cash64.4412.7816.3825.08
Price / Book4.424.085.634.62
Net Income$34.25M$348.60M$963.08M$1.07B
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/AN/A-0.60%
1 Month Performance-20.26%3.20%5.49%4.34%
1 Year Performance131.83%31.91%7.42%28.86%

FIGS Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FIGS
FIGS
3.7095 of 5 stars
$11.67
-24.1%
$15.93
+36.5%
+213.2%$2.56B$631.10M53.04310
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
4.6741 of 5 stars
$22.10
-0.8%
$26.69
+20.8%
+36.9%$8.57B$6.28B14.0819,000
BIRK
Birkenstock
3.5534 of 5 stars
$36.97
-4.5%
$59.71
+61.5%
-24.7%$7.12B$2.32B16.198,400
ZGN
Ermenegildo Zegna
2.3192 of 5 stars
$11.84
-4.8%
$12.26
+3.6%
+64.0%$5.26B$2.17BN/A7,437
KTB
Kontoor Brands
4.144 of 5 stars
$69.32
-4.0%
$91.00
+31.3%
+15.4%$3.99B$3.15B17.1210,600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 5/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners