Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FIGS or ZGN?

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 2.72 $34.25M $0.22 46.79 Ermenegildo Zegna $2.17B 2.61 $111.54M N/A N/A

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FIGS or KTB?

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 2.72 $34.25M $0.22 46.79 Kontoor Brands $3.15B 1.48 $227.45M $4.94 17.05

Is FIGS or KTB more profitable?

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Kontoor Brands 8.30% 60.17% 12.31%

Do analysts recommend BRP or FIGS?

FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 54.74%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score The Baldwin Insurance Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 FIGS 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.55

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, UAA or FIGS?

FIGS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Under Armour $4.97B 0.56 -$495.64M -$1.16 N/A FIGS $631.10M 2.72 $34.25M $0.22 46.79

Is UAA or FIGS more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Under Armour -9.98% 3.01% 1.05% FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37%

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FIGS or UA?

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 2.72 $34.25M $0.22 46.79 Under Armour $4.97B 0.54 -$495.64M -$1.16 N/A

Is FIGS or UA more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Under Armour -9.98% 3.01% 1.05%

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

$10.29 +0.39 (+3.98%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$10.16 -0.13 (-1.25%)

As of 07:26 PM Eastern

Compare

FIGS vs. ZGN, KTB, BRP, UAA, and UA

Should you buy FIGS stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FIGS with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FIGS include Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN), Kontoor Brands (KTB), The Baldwin Insurance Group (BRP), Under Armour (UAA), and Under Armour (UA). These companies are all part of the "apparel" industry.

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Ermenegildo Zegna (NYSE:ZGN) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ermenegildo Zegna has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Ermenegildo Zegna's net margin of 0.00%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Ermenegildo Zegna's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Ermenegildo Zegna	N/A	N/A	N/A

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.9% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS currently has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 54.74%. Ermenegildo Zegna has a consensus price target of $13.01, suggesting a potential downside of 2.56%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Ermenegildo Zegna.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Ermenegildo Zegna	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	2.72	$34.25M	$0.22	46.79
Ermenegildo Zegna	$2.17B	2.61	$111.54M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Ermenegildo Zegna had 3 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna and 0 mentions for FIGS. Ermenegildo Zegna's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat FIGS's score of 0.61 indicating that Ermenegildo Zegna is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	Positive
Ermenegildo Zegna	Positive

Summary

FIGS beats Ermenegildo Zegna on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Kontoor Brands (NYSE:KTB) are both apparel companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Kontoor Brands had 4 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kontoor Brands and 0 mentions for FIGS. Kontoor Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat FIGS's score of 0.61 indicating that Kontoor Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	Positive
Kontoor Brands	Positive

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Kontoor Brands	8.30%	60.17%	12.31%

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.1% of Kontoor Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Kontoor Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kontoor Brands has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

FIGS presently has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 54.74%. Kontoor Brands has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential upside of 8.30%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Kontoor Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Kontoor Brands	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	2.72	$34.25M	$0.22	46.79
Kontoor Brands	$3.15B	1.48	$227.45M	$4.94	17.05

Summary

Kontoor Brands beats FIGS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

The Baldwin Insurance Group (NASDAQ:BRP) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -4.29%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
The Baldwin Insurance Group	-4.29%	9.21%	2.82%
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

FIGS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Baldwin Insurance Group. The Baldwin Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
The Baldwin Insurance Group	$1.27B	2.53	-$90.14M	-$0.92	N/A
FIGS	$631.10M	2.72	$34.25M	$0.22	46.79

70.4% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 54.74%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
The Baldwin Insurance Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

In the previous week, FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
The Baldwin Insurance Group	Neutral
FIGS	Positive

Summary

FIGS beats The Baldwin Insurance Group on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both apparel companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Under Armour presently has a consensus price target of $5.91, suggesting a potential downside of 8.86%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 54.74%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Under Armour	4 Sell rating(s)	14 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.95
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Under Armour	-9.98%	3.01%	1.05%
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

34.6% of Under Armour shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 15.6% of Under Armour shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Under Armour had 6 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Under Armour and 0 mentions for FIGS. Under Armour's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat FIGS's score of 0.61 indicating that Under Armour is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Under Armour	Positive
FIGS	Positive

FIGS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Under Armour	$4.97B	0.56	-$495.64M	-$1.16	N/A
FIGS	$631.10M	2.72	$34.25M	$0.22	46.79

Under Armour has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Under Armour (NYSE:UA) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

FIGS presently has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 54.74%. Under Armour has a consensus target price of $5.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.18%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Under Armour	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.33

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.3% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Under Armour had 6 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Under Armour and 0 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Under Armour's score of 0.60 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	Positive
Under Armour	Positive

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Under Armour	-9.98%	3.01%	1.05%

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	2.72	$34.25M	$0.22	46.79
Under Armour	$4.97B	0.54	-$495.64M	-$1.16	N/A

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FIGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FIGS	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.72B	$9.94B	$26.60B	$23.34B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.17%	175.39%	4.01%
P/E Ratio	46.79	15.30	20.38	30.82
Price / Sales	2.72	1.05	3.89	20.09
Price / Cash	41.42	12.05	17.83	25.43
Price / Book	3.90	4.28	6.30	4.74
Net Income	$34.25M	$378.06M	$948.02M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.74%	-1.38%	-2.85%	-0.70%
1 Month Performance	-11.22%	-1.87%	1.15%	1.64%
1 Year Performance	76.57%	15.29%	-4.60%	16.02%

FIGS Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FIGS FIGS	3.9047 of 5 stars	$10.29 +4.0%	$15.93 +54.7%	+72.0%	$1.65B	$631.10M	45.00	310
ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna	3.2664 of 5 stars	$12.85 -2.3%	$12.68 -1.3%	+52.0%	$5.57B	$1.92B	N/A	7,437	News Coverage Positive News
KTB Kontoor Brands	4.3336 of 5 stars	$81.89 -1.7%	$91.20 +11.4%	+24.3%	$4.60B	$3.15B	16.58	10,600	Positive News
BRP The Baldwin Insurance Group	N/A	$26.22 +9.2%	N/A	-33.0%	$3.08B	$1.27B	N/A	9,200	High Trading Volume
UAA Under Armour	2.9775 of 5 stars	$6.16 -2.3%	$5.91 -4.0%	-3.5%	$2.69B	$4.97B	N/A	14,100	News Coverage Positive News Options Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 7/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS vs. ZGN, KTB, BRP, UAA, and UA

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FIGS vs. The Competition

FIGS Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS vs. ZGN, KTB, BRP, UAA, and UA

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

Which has more risk and volatility, FIGS or ZGN?

Is FIGS or ZGN more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FIGS or ZGN?

Do analysts prefer FIGS or ZGN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FIGS or ZGN?

Does the media refer more to FIGS or ZGN?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

Does the media favor FIGS or KTB?

Is FIGS or KTB more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FIGS or KTB?

Which has more risk and volatility, FIGS or KTB?

Do analysts rate FIGS or KTB?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FIGS or KTB?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

Which has more risk and volatility, BRP or FIGS?

Is BRP or FIGS more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, BRP or FIGS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BRP or FIGS?

Do analysts recommend BRP or FIGS?

Does the media refer more to BRP or FIGS?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Do analysts rate UAA or FIGS?

Is UAA or FIGS more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of UAA or FIGS?

Does the media refer more to UAA or FIGS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, UAA or FIGS?

Which has more risk & volatility, UAA or FIGS?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Do analysts prefer FIGS or UA?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FIGS or UA?

Which has more risk & volatility, FIGS or UA?

Does the media prefer FIGS or UA?

Is FIGS or UA more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FIGS or UA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FIGS vs. The Competition

FIGS Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools