Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ZGN or FIGS?

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ermenegildo Zegna $2.17B 2.90 $111.54M N/A N/A FIGS $631.10M 2.78 $34.25M $0.22 47.74

Does the media favor ZGN or FIGS?

In the previous week, FIGS had 5 more articles in the media than Ermenegildo Zegna. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 3 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.66 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ermenegildo Zegna 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FIGS 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FIGS or KTB?

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 2.78 $34.25M $0.22 47.74 Kontoor Brands $3.34B 1.39 $227.45M $4.94 17.02

Is FIGS or KTB more profitable?

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Kontoor Brands 8.30% 60.17% 12.31%

Does the media refer more to FIGS or KTB?

In the previous week, FIGS had 3 more articles in the media than Kontoor Brands. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 5 mentions for Kontoor Brands. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Kontoor Brands' score of 0.85 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kontoor Brands 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FIGS or BRP?

FIGS currently has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 51.67%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score FIGS 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.55 The Baldwin Insurance Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to FIGS or BRP?

In the previous week, FIGS had 7 more articles in the media than The Baldwin Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 1 mentions for The Baldwin Insurance Group. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive The Baldwin Insurance Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, FIGS or UAA?

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 2.78 $34.25M $0.22 47.74 Under Armour $4.97B 0.59 -$495.64M -$1.16 N/A

Is FIGS or UAA more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Under Armour -9.98% 3.01% 1.05%

Does the media refer more to FIGS or UAA?

In the previous week, FIGS had 4 more articles in the media than Under Armour. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 4 mentions for Under Armour. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Under Armour's score of 0.42 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Under Armour 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FIGS or UA?

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 2.78 $34.25M $0.22 47.74 Under Armour $4.97B 0.57 -$495.64M -$1.16 N/A

Is FIGS or UA more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Under Armour -9.98% 3.01% 1.05%

Does the media refer more to FIGS or UA?

In the previous week, FIGS had 3 more articles in the media than Under Armour. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 5 mentions for Under Armour. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Under Armour's score of 0.26 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Under Armour 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

$10.50 -0.06 (-0.55%)

Closing price 07/30/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$10.33 -0.17 (-1.64%)

As of 04:22 AM Eastern

Compare

FIGS vs. ZGN, KTB, BRP, UAA, and UA

Should you buy FIGS stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FIGS with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FIGS include Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN), Kontoor Brands (KTB), The Baldwin Insurance Group (BRP), Under Armour (UAA), and Under Armour (UA). These companies are all part of the "apparel" industry.

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

Ermenegildo Zegna (NYSE:ZGN) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ermenegildo Zegna	$2.17B	2.90	$111.54M	N/A	N/A
FIGS	$631.10M	2.78	$34.25M	$0.22	47.74

Ermenegildo Zegna presently has a consensus target price of $13.23, suggesting a potential downside of 10.80%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 51.67%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Ermenegildo Zegna.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ermenegildo Zegna	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

12.9% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Ermenegildo Zegna's net margin of 0.00%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Ermenegildo Zegna's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ermenegildo Zegna	N/A	N/A	N/A
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

In the previous week, FIGS had 5 more articles in the media than Ermenegildo Zegna. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 3 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.66 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ermenegildo Zegna	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FIGS	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ermenegildo Zegna has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FIGS beats Ermenegildo Zegna on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Kontoor Brands (NYSE:KTB) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Kontoor Brands	8.30%	60.17%	12.31%

In the previous week, FIGS had 3 more articles in the media than Kontoor Brands. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 5 mentions for Kontoor Brands. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Kontoor Brands' score of 0.85 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kontoor Brands	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kontoor Brands has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

FIGS currently has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 51.67%. Kontoor Brands has a consensus price target of $91.20, indicating a potential upside of 8.49%. Given FIGS's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Kontoor Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Kontoor Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.1% of Kontoor Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Kontoor Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	2.78	$34.25M	$0.22	47.74
Kontoor Brands	$3.34B	1.39	$227.45M	$4.94	17.02

Summary

Kontoor Brands beats FIGS on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and The Baldwin Insurance Group (NASDAQ:BRP) are both apparel companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, FIGS had 7 more articles in the media than The Baldwin Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 1 mentions for The Baldwin Insurance Group. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
The Baldwin Insurance Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.4% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Baldwin Insurance Group. The Baldwin Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	2.78	$34.25M	$0.22	47.74
The Baldwin Insurance Group	$1.27B	2.62	-$90.14M	-$0.92	N/A

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -4.29%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
The Baldwin Insurance Group	-4.29%	9.21%	2.82%

FIGS currently has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 51.67%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
The Baldwin Insurance Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

FIGS beats The Baldwin Insurance Group on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) are both apparel companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Under Armour	-9.98%	3.01%	1.05%

In the previous week, FIGS had 4 more articles in the media than Under Armour. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 4 mentions for Under Armour. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Under Armour's score of 0.42 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Under Armour	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	2.78	$34.25M	$0.22	47.74
Under Armour	$4.97B	0.59	-$495.64M	-$1.16	N/A

FIGS presently has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 51.67%. Under Armour has a consensus price target of $5.91, indicating a potential downside of 13.65%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Under Armour	4 Sell rating(s)	14 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.95

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Under Armour shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Under Armour shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Under Armour (NYSE:UA) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

FIGS presently has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 51.67%. Under Armour has a consensus price target of $5.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.85%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Under Armour	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.33

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of Under Armour shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Under Armour shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FIGS has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	2.78	$34.25M	$0.22	47.74
Under Armour	$4.97B	0.57	-$495.64M	-$1.16	N/A

In the previous week, FIGS had 3 more articles in the media than Under Armour. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for FIGS and 5 mentions for Under Armour. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Under Armour's score of 0.26 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Under Armour	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Under Armour	-9.98%	3.01%	1.05%

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FIGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FIGS	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.76B	$10.65B	$27.12B	$23.53B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.20%	176.83%	4.19%
P/E Ratio	47.74	15.93	23.52	30.73
Price / Sales	2.78	1.08	3.34	81.94
Price / Cash	44.27	12.63	17.89	31.18
Price / Book	3.98	4.64	6.40	4.66
Net Income	$34.25M	$378.06M	$954.63M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	10.47%	4.59%	2.83%	0.55%
1 Month Performance	3.11%	4.97%	0.62%	1.58%
1 Year Performance	62.19%	27.72%	1.87%	17.66%

FIGS Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FIGS FIGS	3.8566 of 5 stars	$10.50 -0.5%	$15.93 +51.7%	+59.6%	$1.76B	$631.10M	47.74	310	News Coverage Positive News Upcoming Earnings
ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna	2.1221 of 5 stars	$13.94 +0.3%	$13.01 -6.6%	+76.0%	$5.88B	$2.17B	N/A	7,437	Analyst Upgrade
KTB Kontoor Brands	3.7916 of 5 stars	$83.30 -2.7%	$91.20 +9.5%	+46.3%	$4.73B	$3.15B	16.86	10,600	Dividend Announcement
BRP The Baldwin Insurance Group	N/A	$27.25 -0.9%	N/A	-24.5%	$3.20B	$1.27B	N/A	9,200	News Coverage Gap Down High Trading Volume
UAA Under Armour	2.621 of 5 stars	$7.27 -2.2%	$5.91 -18.6%	+1.3%	$3.17B	$4.97B	N/A	14,100	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS vs. ZGN, KTB, BRP, UAA, and UA

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FIGS vs. The Competition

FIGS Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS vs. ZGN, KTB, BRP, UAA, and UA

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ZGN or FIGS?

Do analysts recommend ZGN or FIGS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ZGN or FIGS?

Is ZGN or FIGS more profitable?

Does the media favor ZGN or FIGS?

Which has more risk and volatility, ZGN or FIGS?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

Is FIGS or KTB more profitable?

Does the media refer more to FIGS or KTB?

Which has more volatility and risk, FIGS or KTB?

Do analysts rate FIGS or KTB?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FIGS or KTB?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FIGS or KTB?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

Does the media refer more to FIGS or BRP?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FIGS or BRP?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FIGS or BRP?

Which has more volatility and risk, FIGS or BRP?

Is FIGS or BRP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer FIGS or BRP?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Is FIGS or UAA more profitable?

Does the media refer more to FIGS or UAA?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FIGS or UAA?

Do analysts prefer FIGS or UAA?

Which has more risk & volatility, FIGS or UAA?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in FIGS or UAA?

Summary

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

Do analysts prefer FIGS or UA?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FIGS or UA?

Which has more volatility and risk, FIGS or UA?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FIGS or UA?

Does the media refer more to FIGS or UA?

Is FIGS or UA more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FIGS vs. The Competition

FIGS Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools