Which has higher earnings & valuation, BIRK or FIGS?

Birkenstock has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Birkenstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Birkenstock $2.18B 3.91 $385.46M $2.21 21.00 FIGS $631.10M 3.25 $34.25M $0.22 55.81

Is BIRK or FIGS more profitable?

Birkenstock has a net margin of 16.26% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Birkenstock's return on equity of 12.95% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Birkenstock 16.26% 12.95% 7.15% FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37%

Does the media refer more to BIRK or FIGS?

In the previous week, Birkenstock had 9 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Birkenstock and 5 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.30 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Birkenstock 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FIGS or ZGN?

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 3.25 $34.25M $0.22 55.81 Ermenegildo Zegna $2.17B 2.71 $111.54M N/A N/A

Does the media prefer FIGS or ZGN?

In the previous week, FIGS had 3 more articles in the media than Ermenegildo Zegna. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FIGS and 2 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.49 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ermenegildo Zegna 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FIGS or KTB?

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 3.25 $34.25M $0.22 55.81 Kontoor Brands $3.15B 1.37 $227.45M $4.94 15.80

Is FIGS or KTB more profitable?

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Kontoor Brands 8.30% 60.17% 12.31%

Does the media prefer FIGS or KTB?

In the previous week, FIGS and FIGS both had 5 articles in the media. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Kontoor Brands' score of 0.02 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kontoor Brands 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FIGS or UAA?

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 3.25 $34.25M $0.22 55.81 Under Armour $4.97B 0.52 -$495.64M -$1.16 N/A

Is FIGS or UAA more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Under Armour -9.98% 3.01% 1.05%

Does the media prefer FIGS or UAA?

In the previous week, FIGS had 1 more articles in the media than Under Armour. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FIGS and 4 mentions for Under Armour. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Under Armour's score of 0.62 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Under Armour 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate BRP or FIGS?

FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.72%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score The Baldwin Insurance Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 FIGS 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.55

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

$12.28 0.00 (-0.01%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$12.30 +0.03 (+0.21%)

As of 04:12 PM Eastern

Compare

FIGS vs. BIRK, ZGN, KTB, UAA, and BRP

Should you buy FIGS stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FIGS with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FIGS include Birkenstock (BIRK), Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN), Kontoor Brands (KTB), Under Armour (UAA), and The Baldwin Insurance Group (BRP). These companies are all part of the "apparel" industry.

How does FIGS compare to Birkenstock?

Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap apparel companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

19.9% of Birkenstock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Birkenstock has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Birkenstock had 9 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Birkenstock and 5 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.30 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Birkenstock	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Birkenstock has a net margin of 16.26% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Birkenstock's return on equity of 12.95% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Birkenstock	16.26%	12.95%	7.15%
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

Birkenstock has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Birkenstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Birkenstock	$2.18B	3.91	$385.46M	$2.21	21.00
FIGS	$631.10M	3.25	$34.25M	$0.22	55.81

Birkenstock currently has a consensus target price of $53.68, indicating a potential upside of 15.67%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.72%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Birkenstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Birkenstock	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Summary

Birkenstock beats FIGS on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Ermenegildo Zegna (NYSE:ZGN) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

FIGS presently has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 29.72%. Ermenegildo Zegna has a consensus price target of $12.68, suggesting a potential downside of 8.74%. Given FIGS's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Ermenegildo Zegna.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Ermenegildo Zegna	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

In the previous week, FIGS had 3 more articles in the media than Ermenegildo Zegna. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FIGS and 2 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.49 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ermenegildo Zegna	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

FIGS has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ermenegildo Zegna has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.9% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Ermenegildo Zegna's net margin of 0.00%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Ermenegildo Zegna's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Ermenegildo Zegna	N/A	N/A	N/A

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	3.25	$34.25M	$0.22	55.81
Ermenegildo Zegna	$2.17B	2.71	$111.54M	N/A	N/A

Summary

FIGS beats Ermenegildo Zegna on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Kontoor Brands (NYSE:KTB) are both mid-cap apparel companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, FIGS and FIGS both had 5 articles in the media. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Kontoor Brands' score of 0.02 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kontoor Brands	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

FIGS presently has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.72%. Kontoor Brands has a consensus target price of $91.20, indicating a potential upside of 16.83%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Kontoor Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Kontoor Brands	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Kontoor Brands	8.30%	60.17%	12.31%

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.1% of Kontoor Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Kontoor Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	3.25	$34.25M	$0.22	55.81
Kontoor Brands	$3.15B	1.37	$227.45M	$4.94	15.80

FIGS has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kontoor Brands has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kontoor Brands beats FIGS on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) are both mid-cap apparel companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, FIGS had 1 more articles in the media than Under Armour. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FIGS and 4 mentions for Under Armour. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Under Armour's score of 0.62 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Under Armour	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	3.25	$34.25M	$0.22	55.81
Under Armour	$4.97B	0.52	-$495.64M	-$1.16	N/A

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Under Armour	-9.98%	3.01%	1.05%

FIGS has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.69, meaning that its share price is 69% more volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Under Armour shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Under Armour shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS currently has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.72%. Under Armour has a consensus price target of $5.91, indicating a potential downside of 2.54%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Under Armour	4 Sell rating(s)	14 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.95

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

The Baldwin Insurance Group (NASDAQ:BRP) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap apparel companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

70.4% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 22.7% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -4.29%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
The Baldwin Insurance Group	-4.29%	9.21%	2.82%
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

FIGS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Baldwin Insurance Group. The Baldwin Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
The Baldwin Insurance Group	$1.27B	1.61	-$90.14M	-$0.92	N/A
FIGS	$631.10M	3.25	$34.25M	$0.22	55.81

FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 29.72%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
The Baldwin Insurance Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FIGS had 5 more articles in the media than The Baldwin Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FIGS and 0 mentions for The Baldwin Insurance Group. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
The Baldwin Insurance Group	Neutral
FIGS	Positive

Summary

FIGS beats The Baldwin Insurance Group on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FIGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FIGS	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.05B	$10.31B	$26.80B	$23.17B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.00%	175.36%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	55.82	16.15	20.44	31.57
Price / Sales	3.25	1.12	2.33	103.79
Price / Cash	51.23	12.55	14.94	24.31
Price / Book	4.65	4.52	6.20	4.68
Net Income	$34.25M	$377.89M	$961.99M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	9.45%	0.29%	-0.75%	-0.26%
1 Month Performance	6.84%	9.20%	4.54%	2.18%
1 Year Performance	133.66%	29.16%	2.71%	24.64%

FIGS Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FIGS FIGS	4.2303 of 5 stars	$12.28 0.0%	$15.93 +29.7%	+135.0%	$2.05B	$631.10M	55.82	310
BIRK Birkenstock	3.4413 of 5 stars	$43.56 +2.9%	$53.68 +23.2%	-9.2%	$7.79B	$2.18B	19.67	8,400
ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna	1.9191 of 5 stars	$14.84 +1.3%	$12.51 -15.7%	+54.4%	$6.20B	$2.17B	N/A	7,437	Analyst Forecast
KTB Kontoor Brands	4.2358 of 5 stars	$72.48 +3.4%	$91.20 +25.8%	+17.8%	$3.87B	$3.15B	14.67	10,600	Analyst Downgrade Insider Trade Gap Up
UAA Under Armour	2.4525 of 5 stars	$5.67 +1.9%	$5.91 +4.3%	-10.0%	$2.37B	$4.97B	N/A	14,100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors