Which has better valuation & earnings, FIGS or BIRK?

Birkenstock has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Birkenstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 3.13 $34.25M $0.22 53.80 Birkenstock $2.32B 3.60 $385.46M $2.21 20.53

Is FIGS or BIRK more profitable?

Birkenstock has a net margin of 16.26% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Birkenstock's return on equity of 12.95% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Birkenstock 16.26% 12.95% 7.15%

Does the media favor FIGS or BIRK?

In the previous week, Birkenstock had 9 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Birkenstock and 3 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.18 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Birkenstock 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ZGN or FIGS?

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ermenegildo Zegna $2.17B 2.91 $111.54M N/A N/A FIGS $631.10M 3.13 $34.25M $0.22 53.80

Does the media prefer ZGN or FIGS?

In the previous week, FIGS had 2 more articles in the media than Ermenegildo Zegna. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for FIGS and 1 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.85 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ermenegildo Zegna 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, KTB or FIGS?

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Kontoor Brands $3.15B 1.27 $227.45M $4.94 14.69 FIGS $631.10M 3.13 $34.25M $0.22 53.80

Is KTB or FIGS more profitable?

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Kontoor Brands 8.30% 60.17% 12.31% FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37%

Does the media prefer KTB or FIGS?

In the previous week, Kontoor Brands had 5 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Kontoor Brands and 3 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Kontoor Brands' score of 0.09 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kontoor Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer BRP or FIGS?

FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 34.59%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score The Baldwin Insurance Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 FIGS 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.55

Which has better valuation and earnings, FIGS or UAA?

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio FIGS $631.10M 3.13 $34.25M $0.22 53.80 Under Armour $4.97B 0.51 -$495.64M -$1.16 N/A

Is FIGS or UAA more profitable?

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets FIGS 6.10% 9.69% 7.37% Under Armour -9.98% 3.01% 1.05%

Does the media favor FIGS or UAA?

In the previous week, Under Armour had 1 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Under Armour and 3 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Under Armour's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment FIGS 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Under Armour 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

$11.86 -0.41 (-3.30%)

As of 01:10 PM Eastern

Compare

FIGS vs. BIRK, ZGN, KTB, BRP, and UAA

Should you buy FIGS stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FIGS with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FIGS include Birkenstock (BIRK), Ermenegildo Zegna (ZGN), Kontoor Brands (KTB), The Baldwin Insurance Group (BRP), and Under Armour (UAA). These companies are all part of the "apparel" industry.

How does FIGS compare to Birkenstock?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Birkenstock had 9 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Birkenstock and 3 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.18 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Birkenstock	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Birkenstock shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.4% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Birkenstock has a net margin of 16.26% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Birkenstock's return on equity of 12.95% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Birkenstock	16.26%	12.95%	7.15%

Birkenstock has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Birkenstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	3.13	$34.25M	$0.22	53.80
Birkenstock	$2.32B	3.60	$385.46M	$2.21	20.53

FIGS presently has a consensus target price of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 34.59%. Birkenstock has a consensus target price of $53.68, indicating a potential upside of 18.29%. Given FIGS's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Birkenstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Birkenstock	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

FIGS has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birkenstock has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Birkenstock beats FIGS on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Ermenegildo Zegna?

Ermenegildo Zegna (NYSE:ZGN) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Ermenegildo Zegna currently has a consensus target price of $12.51, suggesting a potential downside of 16.05%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 34.59%. Given FIGS's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Ermenegildo Zegna.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ermenegildo Zegna	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Ermenegildo Zegna's net margin of 0.00%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Ermenegildo Zegna's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ermenegildo Zegna	N/A	N/A	N/A
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

Ermenegildo Zegna has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ermenegildo Zegna	$2.17B	2.91	$111.54M	N/A	N/A
FIGS	$631.10M	3.13	$34.25M	$0.22	53.80

In the previous week, FIGS had 2 more articles in the media than Ermenegildo Zegna. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for FIGS and 1 mentions for Ermenegildo Zegna. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Ermenegildo Zegna's score of 0.85 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ermenegildo Zegna	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ermenegildo Zegna has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

12.9% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Ermenegildo Zegna shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

FIGS beats Ermenegildo Zegna on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Kontoor Brands?

Kontoor Brands (NYSE:KTB) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Kontoor Brands has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Kontoor Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kontoor Brands	$3.15B	1.27	$227.45M	$4.94	14.69
FIGS	$631.10M	3.13	$34.25M	$0.22	53.80

Kontoor Brands currently has a consensus price target of $91.33, suggesting a potential upside of 25.87%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, suggesting a potential upside of 34.59%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Kontoor Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kontoor Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

In the previous week, Kontoor Brands had 5 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Kontoor Brands and 3 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Kontoor Brands' score of 0.09 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kontoor Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

93.1% of Kontoor Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Kontoor Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 8.30% compared to FIGS's net margin of 6.10%. Kontoor Brands' return on equity of 60.17% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kontoor Brands	8.30%	60.17%	12.31%
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

Kontoor Brands has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kontoor Brands beats FIGS on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to The Baldwin Insurance Group?

The Baldwin Insurance Group (NASDAQ:BRP) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both apparel companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

70.4% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of The Baldwin Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.4% of FIGS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, FIGS had 3 more articles in the media than The Baldwin Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for FIGS and 0 mentions for The Baldwin Insurance Group. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
The Baldwin Insurance Group	Neutral
FIGS	Positive

FIGS has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Baldwin Insurance Group. The Baldwin Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
The Baldwin Insurance Group	$1.27B	1.84	-$90.14M	-$0.92	N/A
FIGS	$631.10M	3.13	$34.25M	$0.22	53.80

FIGS has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 34.59%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
The Baldwin Insurance Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to The Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -4.29%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
The Baldwin Insurance Group	-4.29%	9.21%	2.82%
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%

Summary

FIGS beats The Baldwin Insurance Group on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Under Armour?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) are both apparel companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

FIGS has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -9.98%. FIGS's return on equity of 9.69% beat Under Armour's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FIGS	6.10%	9.69%	7.37%
Under Armour	-9.98%	3.01%	1.05%

FIGS has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

FIGS currently has a consensus price target of $15.93, indicating a potential upside of 34.59%. Under Armour has a consensus price target of $5.91, indicating a potential downside of 0.74%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Under Armour.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FIGS	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55
Under Armour	4 Sell rating(s)	14 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.95

In the previous week, Under Armour had 1 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Under Armour and 3 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Under Armour's score of 0.00 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
FIGS	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Under Armour	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.4% of FIGS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Under Armour shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FIGS has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. Under Armour is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FIGS	$631.10M	3.13	$34.25M	$0.22	53.80
Under Armour	$4.97B	0.51	-$495.64M	-$1.16	N/A

Summary

FIGS beats Under Armour on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FIGS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FIGS	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.98B	$10.07B	$27.70B	$23.17B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.96%	178.37%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	53.89	17.02	20.82	30.96
Price / Sales	3.13	1.14	3.95	24.71
Price / Cash	53.33	12.59	15.15	24.96
Price / Book	4.59	4.52	5.46	4.81
Net Income	$34.25M	$352.03M	$965.37M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-5.85%	3.93%	2.57%	1.39%
1 Month Performance	-21.58%	-0.05%	4.06%	3.22%
1 Year Performance	170.21%	23.07%	2.67%	27.64%

FIGS Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FIGS FIGS	4.5097 of 5 stars	$11.86 -3.3%	$15.93 +34.4%	+183.7%	$1.98B	$631.10M	54.00	310	Positive News
BIRK Birkenstock	4.0053 of 5 stars	$32.22 +3.3%	$54.14 +68.1%	-18.8%	$5.74B	$2.18B	14.55	8,400
ZGN Ermenegildo Zegna	2.2947 of 5 stars	$12.71 +1.0%	$12.26 -3.5%	+76.5%	$5.32B	$2.17B	N/A	7,437
KTB Kontoor Brands	4.4873 of 5 stars	$64.20 +3.9%	$91.33 +42.3%	+6.4%	$3.41B	$3.15B	13.00	10,600
BRP The Baldwin Insurance Group	N/A	$20.02 +1.1%	N/A	-50.2%	$2.35B	$1.27B	N/A	9,200	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors