Go Pro

FIGS (FIGS) Competitors

FIGS logo
$12.65 -0.61 (-4.58%)
As of 03:26 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FIGS vs. GAP, VSXY, URBN, ANF, and BOOT

Should you buy FIGS stock or one of its competitors? FIGS's main competitors and comparable companies include GAP (GAP), Victoria's Secret & Co. (VSXY), Urban Outfitters (URBN), Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF), and Boot Barn (BOOT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does FIGS compare to GAP?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and GAP (NYSE:GAP) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, GAP had 5 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for GAP and 5 mentions for FIGS. GAP's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat FIGS's score of 0.58 indicating that GAP is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FIGS
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GAP
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.8% of GAP shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.0% of GAP shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FIGS currently has a consensus target price of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 48.09%. GAP has a consensus target price of $27.07, suggesting a potential upside of 30.17%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than GAP.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
GAP
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42

FIGS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to GAP's net margin of 8.14%. GAP's return on equity of 19.72% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FIGS8.72% 12.53% 9.52%
GAP 8.14%19.72%5.94%

FIGS has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GAP has a beta of 2.08, meaning that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the broader market.

GAP has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. GAP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FIGS$631.10M3.33$34.25M$0.3338.29
GAP$15.37B0.48$816M$3.356.21

Summary

GAP beats FIGS on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Victoria's Secret & Co.?

FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) and Victoria's Secret & Co. (NYSE:VSXY) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

FIGS has a net margin of 8.72% compared to Victoria's Secret & Co.'s net margin of 5.46%. Victoria's Secret & Co.'s return on equity of 40.43% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FIGS8.72% 12.53% 9.52%
Victoria's Secret & Co. 5.46%40.43%7.04%

In the previous week, Victoria's Secret & Co. had 18 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Victoria's Secret & Co. and 5 mentions for FIGS. FIGS's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Victoria's Secret & Co.'s score of 0.31 indicating that FIGS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FIGS
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Victoria's Secret & Co.
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Victoria's Secret & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Victoria's Secret & Co. shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Victoria's Secret & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Victoria's Secret & Co. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FIGS$631.10M3.33$34.25M$0.3338.29
Victoria's Secret & Co.$6.55B0.88$161M$3.4521.03

FIGS has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Victoria's Secret & Co. has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its share price is 105% more volatile than the broader market.

FIGS currently has a consensus price target of $18.71, indicating a potential upside of 48.09%. Victoria's Secret & Co. has a consensus price target of $89.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.64%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Victoria's Secret & Co..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Victoria's Secret & Co.
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Summary

FIGS and Victoria's Secret & Co. tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Urban Outfitters?

Urban Outfitters (NASDAQ:URBN) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Urban Outfitters currently has a consensus price target of $89.75, indicating a potential upside of 19.17%. FIGS has a consensus price target of $18.71, indicating a potential upside of 48.09%. Given FIGS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FIGS is more favorable than Urban Outfitters.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Urban Outfitters
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Urban Outfitters has a net margin of 8.79% compared to FIGS's net margin of 8.72%. Urban Outfitters' return on equity of 18.64% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Urban Outfitters8.79% 18.64% 10.34%
FIGS 8.72%12.53%9.52%

Urban Outfitters has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Urban Outfitters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Urban Outfitters$6.17B1.05$464.92M$6.4111.75
FIGS$631.10M3.33$34.25M$0.3338.29

In the previous week, Urban Outfitters had 8 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Urban Outfitters and 5 mentions for FIGS. Urban Outfitters' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat FIGS's score of 0.58 indicating that Urban Outfitters is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Urban Outfitters
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FIGS
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

77.6% of Urban Outfitters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 32.1% of Urban Outfitters shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Urban Outfitters beats FIGS on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Abercrombie & Fitch?

Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE:ANF) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Abercrombie & Fitch has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Abercrombie & Fitch is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Abercrombie & Fitch$5.27B1.15$506.92M$11.6812.26
FIGS$631.10M3.33$34.25M$0.3338.29

92.2% of FIGS shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Abercrombie & Fitch shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 10.03% compared to FIGS's net margin of 8.72%. Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 33.52% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Abercrombie & Fitch10.03% 33.52% 13.05%
FIGS 8.72%12.53%9.52%

In the previous week, Abercrombie & Fitch had 20 more articles in the media than FIGS. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Abercrombie & Fitch and 5 mentions for FIGS. Abercrombie & Fitch's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat FIGS's score of 0.58 indicating that Abercrombie & Fitch is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Abercrombie & Fitch
7 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FIGS
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Abercrombie & Fitch presently has a consensus target price of $155.38, suggesting a potential upside of 8.54%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $18.71, suggesting a potential upside of 48.09%. Given FIGS's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FIGS is more favorable than Abercrombie & Fitch.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Abercrombie & Fitch
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Summary

Abercrombie & Fitch beats FIGS on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FIGS compare to Boot Barn?

Boot Barn (NYSE:BOOT) and FIGS (NYSE:FIGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

92.2% of FIGS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Boot Barn shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.1% of FIGS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Boot Barn presently has a consensus target price of $219.55, indicating a potential upside of 56.00%. FIGS has a consensus target price of $18.71, indicating a potential upside of 48.09%. Given Boot Barn's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Boot Barn is more favorable than FIGS.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Boot Barn
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
FIGS
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

In the previous week, Boot Barn and Boot Barn both had 5 articles in the media. Boot Barn's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat FIGS's score of 0.58 indicating that Boot Barn is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Boot Barn
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FIGS
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Boot Barn has a net margin of 10.35% compared to FIGS's net margin of 8.72%. Boot Barn's return on equity of 18.78% beat FIGS's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Boot Barn10.35% 18.78% 10.03%
FIGS 8.72%12.53%9.52%

Boot Barn has higher revenue and earnings than FIGS. Boot Barn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FIGS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Boot Barn$2.25B1.89$225.88M$7.9017.81
FIGS$631.10M3.33$34.25M$0.3338.29

Boot Barn has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FIGS has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Boot Barn beats FIGS on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FIGS News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FIGS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIGS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FIGS vs. The Competition

MetricFIGSSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.10B$10.48B$12.51B$23.13B
Dividend YieldN/A87.30%51.59%3.76%
P/E Ratio38.2924.4845.6428.46
Price / Sales3.3317.5692.5519.59
Price / Cash57.3513.1028.7934.36
Price / Book4.795.314.074.70
Net Income$34.25M$439.64M$445.09M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-16.43%-2.13%-2.12%-2.36%
1 Month Performance-11.89%-6.12%-4.35%-2.89%
1 Year Performance85.39%-8.60%-6.30%10.58%

FIGS Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FIGS
FIGS
4.176 of 5 stars
$12.64
-4.7%
$18.71
+48.1%
+100.4%$2.10B$631.10M38.29310
GAP
GAP
4.6504 of 5 stars
$22.34
-4.9%
$27.36
+22.5%
-11.5%$8.45B$15.37B6.6779,000
VSXY
Victoria's Secret & Co.
4.83 of 5 stars
$85.79
-2.3%
$90.70
+5.7%
+198.4%$6.98B$6.55B46.1233,000
URBN
Urban Outfitters
4.0694 of 5 stars
$80.69
-0.5%
$90.64
+12.3%
+7.6%$6.94B$6.17B12.5931,000
ANF
Abercrombie & Fitch
3.3071 of 5 stars
$142.91
-3.7%
$154.17
+7.9%
+60.2%$6.59B$5.27B12.2443,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FIGS) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners