Go Pro

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

NanoXplore logo
C$1.59 -0.06 (-3.64%)
As of 08/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

GRA vs. ECO, IPD, ARQ, VNP, and NEO

Should you buy NanoXplore stock or one of its competitors? NanoXplore's main competitors and comparable companies include EcoSynthetix (ECO), International Parkside Products (IPD), ARQ (ARQ), 5N Plus (VNP), and Neo Performance Materials (NEO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.

How does NanoXplore compare to EcoSynthetix?

EcoSynthetix (TSE:ECO) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

EcoSynthetix has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NanoXplore. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EcoSynthetixC$20.07M7.04-C$1.21M-C$0.02N/A
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.56-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A

In the previous week, EcoSynthetix's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NanoXplore'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
EcoSynthetix Neutral
NanoXplore Neutral

EcoSynthetix has a net margin of -4.72% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. EcoSynthetix's return on equity of -2.47% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EcoSynthetix-4.72% -2.47% -6.26%
NanoXplore -10.91%-11.76%-4.04%

0.3% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.5% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

EcoSynthetix has a beta of 0.666925, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, suggesting that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 151.57%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than EcoSynthetix.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EcoSynthetix
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

NanoXplore beats EcoSynthetix on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to International Parkside Products?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and International Parkside Products (CVE:IPD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

International Parkside Products has a net margin of -6.32% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. NanoXplore's return on equity of -11.76% beat International Parkside Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.91% -11.76% -4.04%
International Parkside Products -6.32%-49.33%-7.48%

International Parkside Products has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Parkside Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.56-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A
International Parkside ProductsC$3.24M0.25C$21.26KC$0.0038.82

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.9% of International Parkside Products shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Parkside Products has a beta of -2.130256, meaning that its share price is 313% less volatile than the broader market.

NanoXplore presently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 151.57%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than International Parkside Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
International Parkside Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled International Parkside Products'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore Neutral
International Parkside Products Neutral

Summary

NanoXplore beats International Parkside Products on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to ARQ?

ARQ (CNSX:ARQ) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

ARQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. ARQ's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ARQN/A N/A N/A
NanoXplore -10.91%-11.76%-4.04%

NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 151.57%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than ARQ.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ARQ
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ARQ has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NanoXplore.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ARQN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.56-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ARQ had 1 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ARQ and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. ARQ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NanoXplore'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ARQ Neutral
NanoXplore Neutral

Summary

NanoXplore beats ARQ on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to 5N Plus?

5N Plus (TSE:VNP) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

5N Plus has a net margin of 14.08% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. 5N Plus' return on equity of 29.60% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
5N Plus14.08% 29.60% 3.16%
NanoXplore -10.91%-11.76%-4.04%

5N Plus currently has a consensus price target of C$45.28, suggesting a potential upside of 46.77%. NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 151.57%. Given NanoXplore's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than 5N Plus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
5N Plus
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.30
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, 5N Plus had 16 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for 5N Plus and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat 5N Plus' score of -0.10 indicating that NanoXplore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
5N Plus Neutral
NanoXplore Neutral

5N Plus has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 5N Plus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
5N PlusC$447.11M6.21C$11.26MC$0.6944.71
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.56-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A

27.9% of 5N Plus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of 5N Plus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

5N Plus has a beta of 0.951652, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, indicating that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

5N Plus beats NanoXplore on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.437329, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 151.57%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$50.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.92%. Given NanoXplore's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of -2.03% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of -2.63% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.91% -11.76% -4.04%
Neo Performance Materials -2.03%-2.63%1.87%

Neo Performance Materials has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.56-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A
Neo Performance MaterialsC$512.15M3.98-C$1.56M-C$0.24N/A

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Neo Performance Materials'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore Neutral
Neo Performance Materials Neutral

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats NanoXplore on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NanoXplore News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRA vs. The Competition

MetricNanoXploreChemicals IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$288.56MC$11.40BC$4.90BC$12.63B
Dividend Yield12.38%2.81%4.70%6.20%
P/E Ratio-19.8820.8021.3435.02
Price / Sales2.5646.375,149.439.83
Price / Cash9.2215.5224.6382.29
Price / Book2.513.718.884.60
Net Income-C$11.17MC$223.51MC$154.60MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.63%1.57%5.65%2.27%
1 Month Performance7.43%3.34%5.93%2.86%
1 Year Performance-45.36%23.46%44.42%36.17%

NanoXplore Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRA
NanoXplore
2.4071 of 5 stars
C$1.59
-3.6%
C$4.00
+151.6%
-45.5%C$288.56MC$112.73MN/A450
ECO
EcoSynthetix
N/AC$2.62
flat
N/A-45.8%C$154.18MC$20.07MN/A25
IPD
International Parkside Products
N/AC$0.05
flat
N/A+11.1%C$825KC$3.24M38.82N/A
ARQ
ARQ
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/A140
VNP
5N Plus
2.8792 of 5 stars
C$29.79
flat
C$47.81
+60.5%
+101.5%C$2.68BC$420.07M45.83780

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GRA) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners