Do analysts rate GRA or ECO?

NanoXplore presently has a consensus target price of C$2.65, indicating a potential upside of 99.25%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than EcoSynthetix. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 EcoSynthetix 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GRA or ECO?

EcoSynthetix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NanoXplore C$115.04M 2.10 -C$11.17M -C$0.07 N/A EcoSynthetix C$20.07M 5.60 -C$1.21M -C$0.02 N/A

Do analysts rate GRA or IPD?

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$2.65, suggesting a potential upside of 99.25%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than International Parkside Products. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 International Parkside Products 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer GRA or ARQ?

NanoXplore presently has a consensus target price of C$2.65, suggesting a potential upside of 99.25%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than ARQ. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 ARQ 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GRA or ARQ?

ARQ has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NanoXplore C$115.04M 2.10 -C$11.17M -C$0.07 N/A ARQ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is GRA or ARQ more profitable?

ARQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.09%. ARQ's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NanoXplore -10.09% -10.72% -4.04% ARQ N/A N/A N/A

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, IFOS or GRA?

Itafos has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Itafos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Itafos C$581.66M 0.72 C$6.85M C$0.26 8.27 NanoXplore C$115.04M 2.10 -C$11.17M -C$0.07 N/A

Is IFOS or GRA more profitable?

Itafos has a net margin of 8.94% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.09%. Itafos' return on equity of 11.79% beat NanoXplore's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Itafos 8.94% 11.79% 8.65% NanoXplore -10.09% -10.72% -4.04%

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

C$1.33 -0.03 (-2.21%)

As of 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

GRA vs. ECO, IPD, ARQ, NEO, and IFOS

Should you buy NanoXplore stock or one of its competitors? NanoXplore's main competitors and comparable companies include EcoSynthetix (ECO), International Parkside Products (IPD), ARQ (ARQ), Neo Performance Materials (NEO), and Itafos (IFOS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does NanoXplore compare to EcoSynthetix?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and EcoSynthetix (TSE:ECO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, NanoXplore had 1 more articles in the media than EcoSynthetix. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NanoXplore and 0 mentions for EcoSynthetix. EcoSynthetix's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NanoXplore's score of -0.26 indicating that EcoSynthetix is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
EcoSynthetix	Neutral

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.171903, meaning that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EcoSynthetix has a beta of 0.872009, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

6.4% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.5% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NanoXplore presently has a consensus target price of C$2.65, indicating a potential upside of 99.25%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than EcoSynthetix.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
EcoSynthetix	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

EcoSynthetix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$115.04M	2.10	-C$11.17M	-C$0.07	N/A
EcoSynthetix	C$20.07M	5.60	-C$1.21M	-C$0.02	N/A

EcoSynthetix has a net margin of -4.72% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.09%. EcoSynthetix's return on equity of -2.47% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.09%	-10.72%	-4.04%
EcoSynthetix	-4.72%	-2.47%	-6.26%

Summary

NanoXplore beats EcoSynthetix on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to International Parkside Products?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and International Parkside Products (CVE:IPD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

International Parkside Products has a net margin of -6.32% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.09%. NanoXplore's return on equity of -10.72% beat International Parkside Products' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.09%	-10.72%	-4.04%
International Parkside Products	-6.32%	-49.33%	-7.48%

6.4% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.9% of International Parkside Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$2.65, suggesting a potential upside of 99.25%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than International Parkside Products.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
International Parkside Products	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

International Parkside Products has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Parkside Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$115.04M	2.10	-C$11.17M	-C$0.07	N/A
International Parkside Products	C$3.24M	0.25	C$21.26K	C$0.00	38.82

In the previous week, NanoXplore had 1 more articles in the media than International Parkside Products. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NanoXplore and 0 mentions for International Parkside Products. International Parkside Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NanoXplore's score of -0.26 indicating that International Parkside Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
International Parkside Products	Neutral

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.171903, suggesting that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Parkside Products has a beta of -2.808838, suggesting that its share price is 381% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NanoXplore beats International Parkside Products on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to ARQ?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and ARQ (CNSX:ARQ) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

6.4% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, NanoXplore had 1 more articles in the media than ARQ. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NanoXplore and 0 mentions for ARQ. ARQ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NanoXplore's score of -0.26 indicating that ARQ is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
ARQ	Neutral

NanoXplore presently has a consensus target price of C$2.65, suggesting a potential upside of 99.25%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than ARQ.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
ARQ	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

ARQ has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$115.04M	2.10	-C$11.17M	-C$0.07	N/A
ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

ARQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.09%. ARQ's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.09%	-10.72%	-4.04%
ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

NanoXplore beats ARQ on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.329523, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.171903, indicating that its share price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

19.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.09%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	0.15%	0.21%	1.87%
NanoXplore	-10.09%	-10.72%	-4.04%

Neo Performance Materials has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$603.19M	2.11	-C$1.56M	C$0.01	2,750.00
NanoXplore	C$115.04M	2.10	-C$11.17M	-C$0.07	N/A

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$56.17, indicating a potential upside of 104.24%. NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$2.65, indicating a potential upside of 99.25%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than NanoXplore.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, NanoXplore had 1 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NanoXplore and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NanoXplore's score of -0.26 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
NanoXplore	Neutral

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats NanoXplore on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Itafos?

Itafos (CVE:IFOS) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, NanoXplore had 1 more articles in the media than Itafos. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NanoXplore and 0 mentions for Itafos. Itafos' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NanoXplore's score of -0.26 indicating that Itafos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Itafos	Neutral
NanoXplore	Neutral

Itafos currently has a consensus target price of C$3.75, suggesting a potential upside of 74.42%. NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$2.65, suggesting a potential upside of 99.25%. Given NanoXplore's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Itafos.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Itafos	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Itafos has a net margin of 8.94% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.09%. Itafos' return on equity of 11.79% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Itafos	8.94%	11.79%	8.65%
NanoXplore	-10.09%	-10.72%	-4.04%

Itafos has a beta of -0.054967, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.171903, suggesting that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

Itafos has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Itafos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Itafos	C$581.66M	0.72	C$6.85M	C$0.26	8.27
NanoXplore	C$115.04M	2.10	-C$11.17M	-C$0.07	N/A

0.8% of Itafos shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 67.4% of Itafos shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Itafos beats NanoXplore on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NanoXplore News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GRA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	NanoXplore	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$241.38M	C$10.98B	C$4.77B	C$12.70B
Dividend Yield	12.38%	2.99%	4.78%	6.35%
P/E Ratio	-19.00	33.87	24.39	38.68
Price / Sales	2.10	53.42	15,482.34	9.04
Price / Cash	9.22	14.67	24.97	82.29
Price / Book	2.13	3.14	9.85	4.47
Net Income	-C$11.17M	C$230.18M	C$159.48M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-8.90%	-0.38%	0.52%	0.02%
1 Month Performance	-2.92%	-3.60%	-2.74%	-1.53%
1 Year Performance	-50.37%	16.89%	18.43%	17.32%

NanoXplore Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GRA NanoXplore	2.7301 of 5 stars	C$1.33 -2.2%	C$2.65 +99.2%	-50.4%	C$241.38M	C$115.04M	N/A	363	News Coverage
ECO EcoSynthetix	N/A	C$1.78 +0.6%	N/A	-54.8%	C$104.64M	C$20.07M	N/A	28
IPD International Parkside Products	N/A	C$0.05 flat	N/A	+11.1%	C$825K	C$3.24M	38.82	N/A
ARQ ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$0.00	N/A	N/A	140	High Trading Volume
NEO Neo Performance Materials	2.6078 of 5 stars	C$30.19 -0.5%	C$56.17 +86.0%	+34.8%	C$1.39B	C$603.19M	3,019.00	1,532

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GRA) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. ECO, IPD, ARQ, NEO, and IFOS

How does NanoXplore compare to EcoSynthetix?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to International Parkside Products?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to ARQ?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Itafos?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. ECO, IPD, ARQ, NEO, and IFOS

How does NanoXplore compare to EcoSynthetix?

Does the media prefer GRA or ECO?

Which has more risk and volatility, GRA or ECO?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GRA or ECO?

Do analysts rate GRA or ECO?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GRA or ECO?

Is GRA or ECO more profitable?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to International Parkside Products?

Is GRA or IPD more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of GRA or IPD?

Do analysts rate GRA or IPD?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GRA or IPD?

Does the media refer more to GRA or IPD?

Which has more risk & volatility, GRA or IPD?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to ARQ?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GRA or ARQ?

Does the media favor GRA or ARQ?

Do analysts prefer GRA or ARQ?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GRA or ARQ?

Is GRA or ARQ more profitable?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Which has more volatility and risk, NEO or GRA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NEO or GRA?

Is NEO or GRA more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, NEO or GRA?

Do analysts recommend NEO or GRA?

Does the media refer more to NEO or GRA?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Itafos?

Does the media favor IFOS or GRA?

Do analysts rate IFOS or GRA?

Is IFOS or GRA more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, IFOS or GRA?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, IFOS or GRA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of IFOS or GRA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools