Do analysts recommend GRA or ECO?

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 148.45%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than EcoSynthetix. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 EcoSynthetix 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GRA or ECO?

EcoSynthetix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.59 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A EcoSynthetix C$20.07M 6.74 -C$1.21M -C$0.02 N/A

Do analysts recommend IPD or GRA?

NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 148.45%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than International Parkside Products. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score International Parkside Products 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate ARQ or GRA?

NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 148.45%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than ARQ. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ARQ 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, ARQ or GRA?

ARQ has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NanoXplore. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ARQ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.59 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A

Is ARQ or GRA more profitable?

ARQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. ARQ's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ARQ N/A N/A N/A NanoXplore -10.91% -11.76% -4.04%

Which has better valuation & earnings, IFOS or GRA?

Itafos has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Itafos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Itafos C$581.66M 0.82 C$6.85M C$0.26 9.46 NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.59 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A

Is IFOS or GRA more profitable?

Itafos has a net margin of 8.94% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Itafos' return on equity of 11.79% beat NanoXplore's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Itafos 8.94% 11.79% 8.65% NanoXplore -10.91% -11.76% -4.04%

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

C$1.61 -0.01 (-0.62%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

GRA vs. ECO, IPD, ARQ, NEO, and IFOS

Should you buy NanoXplore stock or one of its competitors? NanoXplore's main competitors and comparable companies include EcoSynthetix (ECO), International Parkside Products (IPD), ARQ (ARQ), Neo Performance Materials (NEO), and Itafos (IFOS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does NanoXplore compare to EcoSynthetix?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and EcoSynthetix (TSE:ECO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

EcoSynthetix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.59	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
EcoSynthetix	C$20.07M	6.74	-C$1.21M	-C$0.02	N/A

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of EcoSynthetix shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.5% of EcoSynthetix shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EcoSynthetix has a net margin of -4.72% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. EcoSynthetix's return on equity of -2.47% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
EcoSynthetix	-4.72%	-2.47%	-6.26%

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 148.45%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than EcoSynthetix.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
EcoSynthetix	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, suggesting that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EcoSynthetix has a beta of 0.666925, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled EcoSynthetix'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
EcoSynthetix	Neutral

Summary

NanoXplore beats EcoSynthetix on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to International Parkside Products?

International Parkside Products (CVE:IPD) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 148.45%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than International Parkside Products.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
International Parkside Products	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

International Parkside Products has a beta of -2.130256, meaning that its share price is 313% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

International Parkside Products has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Parkside Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
International Parkside Products	C$3.24M	0.25	C$21.26K	C$0.00	38.82
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.59	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A

International Parkside Products has a net margin of -6.32% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. NanoXplore's return on equity of -11.76% beat International Parkside Products' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
International Parkside Products	-6.32%	-49.33%	-7.48%
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.9% of International Parkside Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, International Parkside Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NanoXplore'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
International Parkside Products	Neutral
NanoXplore	Neutral

Summary

NanoXplore beats International Parkside Products on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to ARQ?

ARQ (CNSX:ARQ) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

ARQ has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. ARQ's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%

In the previous week, ARQ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NanoXplore'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ARQ	Neutral
NanoXplore	Neutral

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 148.45%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than ARQ.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ARQ	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

ARQ has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NanoXplore.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.59	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A

Summary

NanoXplore beats ARQ on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NanoXplore presently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 148.45%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 78.99%. Given NanoXplore's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Neo Performance Materials'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
Neo Performance Materials	0.15%	0.21%	1.87%

Neo Performance Materials has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.59	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$603.19M	2.40	-C$1.56M	C$0.01	3,138.00

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, suggesting that its stock price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.437329, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats NanoXplore on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Itafos?

Itafos (CVE:IFOS) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Itafos presently has a consensus target price of C$3.75, indicating a potential upside of 52.44%. NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 148.45%. Given NanoXplore's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Itafos.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Itafos	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Itafos has a beta of 0.020122, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, meaning that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market.

0.9% of Itafos shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 67.4% of Itafos shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Itafos had 1 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Itafos and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Itafos' score of -0.90 indicating that NanoXplore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Itafos	Negative
NanoXplore	Neutral

Itafos has a net margin of 8.94% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Itafos' return on equity of 11.79% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Itafos	8.94%	11.79%	8.65%
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%

Itafos has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Itafos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Itafos	C$581.66M	0.82	C$6.85M	C$0.26	9.46
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.59	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A

Summary

Itafos beats NanoXplore on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NanoXplore News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GRA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	NanoXplore	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$292.19M	C$11.56B	C$5.05B	C$12.42B
Dividend Yield	12.38%	2.85%	4.67%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	-20.13	39.02	26.08	39.48
Price / Sales	2.59	50.76	4,447.46	10.10
Price / Cash	9.22	15.24	24.69	82.29
Price / Book	2.54	3.46	8.99	4.72
Net Income	-C$11.17M	C$222.55M	C$156.32M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-5.29%	0.21%	5.94%	-0.88%
1 Month Performance	1.26%	3.18%	18.87%	4.67%
1 Year Performance	-49.05%	16.68%	46.63%	29.07%

NanoXplore Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GRA NanoXplore	2.3341 of 5 stars	C$1.61 -0.6%	C$4.00 +148.4%	-48.7%	C$292.19M	C$112.73M	N/A	450
ECO EcoSynthetix	N/A	C$2.46 flat	N/A	-46.5%	C$144.76M	C$20.07M	N/A	25	Gap Down High Trading Volume
IPD International Parkside Products	N/A	C$0.05 flat	N/A	+11.1%	C$825K	C$3.24M	38.82	N/A
ARQ ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$0.00	N/A	N/A	140	High Trading Volume
NEO Neo Performance Materials	2.2845 of 5 stars	C$33.63 -0.1%	C$56.17 +67.0%	+84.7%	C$1.55B	C$603.19M	3,363.00	2,100	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GRA) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. ECO, IPD, ARQ, NEO, and IFOS

How does NanoXplore compare to EcoSynthetix?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to International Parkside Products?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to ARQ?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Itafos?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. ECO, IPD, ARQ, NEO, and IFOS

How does NanoXplore compare to EcoSynthetix?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GRA or ECO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GRA or ECO?

Is GRA or ECO more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GRA or ECO?

Which has more volatility & risk, GRA or ECO?

Does the media refer more to GRA or ECO?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to International Parkside Products?

Do analysts recommend IPD or GRA?

Which has more volatility and risk, IPD or GRA?

Which has better earnings and valuation, IPD or GRA?

Is IPD or GRA more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in IPD or GRA?

Does the media prefer IPD or GRA?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to ARQ?

Is ARQ or GRA more profitable?

Does the media favor ARQ or GRA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ARQ or GRA?

Do analysts rate ARQ or GRA?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ARQ or GRA?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GRA or NEO?

Do analysts recommend GRA or NEO?

Does the media refer more to GRA or NEO?

Is GRA or NEO more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GRA or NEO?

Which has more risk & volatility, GRA or NEO?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Itafos?

Do analysts prefer IFOS or GRA?

Which has more volatility & risk, IFOS or GRA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in IFOS or GRA?

Does the media prefer IFOS or GRA?

Is IFOS or GRA more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, IFOS or GRA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools