Go Pro

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

NanoXplore logo
C$1.50 -0.02 (-1.32%)
As of 12:27 PM Eastern

GRA vs. MX, NCX, ODV, FIL, and SLL

Should you buy NanoXplore stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares NanoXplore with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with NanoXplore include Methanex (MX), NorthIsle Copper and Gold (NCX), Osisko Development (ODV), Filo Mining (FIL), and Standard Lithium (SLL). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does NanoXplore compare to Methanex?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Methanex (TSE:MX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Methanex has a net margin of -1.26% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Methanex's return on equity of -1.84% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.91% -11.76% -4.04%
Methanex -1.26%-1.84%1.99%

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of Methanex shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Methanex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Methanex has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.41-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A
MethanexC$3.67B1.64C$107.23M-C$0.73N/A

In the previous week, Methanex had 12 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Methanex and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. Methanex's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat NanoXplore's score of 0.00 indicating that Methanex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore Neutral
Methanex Positive

NanoXplore presently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 166.67%. Methanex has a consensus price target of C$60.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.68%. Given NanoXplore's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Methanex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Methanex
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.036684, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Methanex has a beta of 0.629511, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Methanex beats NanoXplore on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to NorthIsle Copper and Gold?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and NorthIsle Copper and Gold (CVE:NCX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and profitability.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 166.67%. NorthIsle Copper and Gold has a consensus target price of C$5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 84.56%. Given NanoXplore's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than NorthIsle Copper and Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
NorthIsle Copper and Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NorthIsle Copper and Gold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore Neutral
NorthIsle Copper and Gold Neutral

NorthIsle Copper and Gold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. NanoXplore's return on equity of -11.76% beat NorthIsle Copper and Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.91% -11.76% -4.04%
NorthIsle Copper and Gold N/A -30.68%-31.83%

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.036684, suggesting that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NorthIsle Copper and Gold has a beta of 1.704797, suggesting that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market.

NorthIsle Copper and Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. NorthIsle Copper and Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.41-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A
NorthIsle Copper and GoldN/AN/A-C$9.83M-C$0.07N/A

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of NorthIsle Copper and Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of NorthIsle Copper and Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

NorthIsle Copper and Gold beats NanoXplore on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Osisko Development?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.8% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 1 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Osisko Development and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat NanoXplore's score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore Neutral
Osisko Development Positive

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.036684, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 2.221719, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

NanoXplore has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.41-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M25.95-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A

NanoXplore has a net margin of -10.91% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. Osisko Development's return on equity of -10.60% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.91% -11.76% -4.04%
Osisko Development -189.60%-10.60%-16.19%

NanoXplore presently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 166.67%. Osisko Development has a consensus price target of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 180.37%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than NanoXplore.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Summary

Osisko Development beats NanoXplore on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Filo Mining?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Filo Mining (CVE:FIL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Filo Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Filo Mining's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.91% -11.76% -4.04%
Filo Mining N/A N/A N/A

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 166.67%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Filo Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Filo Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Filo Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. Filo Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.41-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A
Filo MiningN/AN/AN/A-C$0.19N/A

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Filo Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore Neutral
Filo Mining Neutral

Summary

NanoXplore beats Filo Mining on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Standard Lithium?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Standard Lithium (CVE:SLL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Standard Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Standard Lithium's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.91% -11.76% -4.04%
Standard Lithium N/A N/A N/A

Standard Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. Standard Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$112.73M2.41-C$11.17M-C$0.08N/A
Standard LithiumN/AN/AN/A-C$0.21N/A

NanoXplore currently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 166.67%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Standard Lithium.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Standard Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Standard Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore Neutral
Standard Lithium Neutral

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NanoXplore beats Standard Lithium on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NanoXplore News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GRA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GRA vs. The Competition

MetricNanoXploreChemicals IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$272.23MC$17.74BC$4.52BC$12.29B
Dividend Yield12.38%4.03%5.04%6.18%
P/E Ratio-18.7521.9420.8536.64
Price / Sales2.411.365,710.529.54
Price / Cash9.227.4924.0782.29
Price / Book2.371.708.574.45
Net Income-C$11.17MC$173.62MC$157.08MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.67%-0.83%-0.73%-0.15%
1 Month Performance-10.18%-4.10%-4.72%-0.58%
1 Year Performance-49.15%9.96%36.83%31.36%

NanoXplore Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GRA
NanoXplore
1.9389 of 5 stars
C$1.50
-1.3%
C$4.00
+166.7%
-47.0%C$272.23MC$112.73MN/A450
MX
Methanex
2.4358 of 5 stars
C$76.02
+5.3%
C$60.00
-21.1%
+66.1%C$5.88BC$3.67BN/A900
NCX
NorthIsle Copper and Gold
1.7754 of 5 stars
C$3.21
+2.9%
C$5.50
+71.3%
+144.1%C$1.07BN/AN/AN/A
ODV
Osisko Development
1.4382 of 5 stars
C$3.37
+2.1%
C$9.00
+167.1%
-4.2%C$1.03BC$37.69MN/A310
FIL
Filo Mining
N/AC$8.97
-0.1%
N/A+0.0%C$1.02BN/AN/A40

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GRA) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners