Which has higher valuation & earnings, GRA or MX?

Methanex has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.64 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A Methanex C$3.67B 1.46 C$107.23M -C$0.73 N/A

Is GRA or MX more profitable?

Methanex has a net margin of -1.26% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Methanex's return on equity of -1.84% beat NanoXplore's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NanoXplore -10.91% -11.76% -4.04% Methanex -1.26% -1.84% 1.99%

Do analysts rate GRA or KRR?

NanoXplore presently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.90%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Karora Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Karora Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, GRA or KRR?

Karora Resources has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Karora Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.64 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A Karora Resources C$416.32M 0.00 C$8.92M C$0.05 N/A

Do analysts prefer GRA or SLI?

NanoXplore currently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.90%. Given NanoXplore's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Standard Lithium. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Standard Lithium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00

Do analysts rate GRA or PDL?

NanoXplore currently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.90%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than North American Palladium. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 North American Palladium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ODV or GRA?

NanoXplore has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Osisko Development C$37.69M 27.81 -C$332.96M -C$0.49 N/A NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.64 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

C$1.64 -0.02 (-1.20%)

As of 06/29/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

GRA vs. MX, KRR, SLI, PDL, and ODV

Should you buy NanoXplore stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares NanoXplore with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with NanoXplore include Methanex (MX), Karora Resources (KRR), Standard Lithium (SLI), North American Palladium (PDL), and Osisko Development (ODV). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does NanoXplore compare to Methanex?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Methanex (TSE:MX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Methanex has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.64	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
Methanex	C$3.67B	1.46	C$107.23M	-C$0.73	N/A

Methanex has a net margin of -1.26% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Methanex's return on equity of -1.84% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
Methanex	-1.26%	-1.84%	1.99%

In the previous week, Methanex had 2 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Methanex and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Methanex'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
Methanex	Neutral

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.9% of Methanex shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Methanex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, suggesting that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Methanex has a beta of 0.555104, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.90%. Methanex has a consensus target price of C$60.00, indicating a potential downside of 13.42%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Methanex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Methanex	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Methanex beats NanoXplore on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Karora Resources?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Karora Resources (TSE:KRR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, meaning that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Karora Resources has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its share price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

NanoXplore presently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.90%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Karora Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Karora Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Karora Resources has a net margin of 2.14% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Karora Resources' return on equity of 2.49% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
Karora Resources	2.14%	2.49%	4.22%

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Karora Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Karora Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Karora Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
Karora Resources	Neutral

Karora Resources has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Karora Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.64	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
Karora Resources	C$416.32M	0.00	C$8.92M	C$0.05	N/A

Summary

Karora Resources beats NanoXplore on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Standard Lithium?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Standard Lithium (CVE:SLI) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Standard Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Standard Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.90%. Given NanoXplore's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Standard Lithium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Standard Lithium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

Standard Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.64	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
Standard Lithium	N/A	N/A	C$152.14M	-C$0.23	N/A

Standard Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. NanoXplore's return on equity of -11.76% beat Standard Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
Standard Lithium	N/A	-15.68%	-10.09%

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Standard Lithium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
Standard Lithium	Neutral

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, meaning that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Standard Lithium has a beta of 1.536856, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NanoXplore and Standard Lithium tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to North American Palladium?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and North American Palladium (TSE:PDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

North American Palladium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. North American Palladium's return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
North American Palladium	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled North American Palladium'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
North American Palladium	Neutral

North American Palladium has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Palladium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.64	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
North American Palladium	C$536.30M	0.00	C$184.64M	C$3.14	N/A

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.90%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than North American Palladium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
North American Palladium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

North American Palladium beats NanoXplore on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

20.5% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Osisko Development presently has a consensus target price of C$9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 161.63%. NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.90%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than NanoXplore.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Osisko Development	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

NanoXplore has a net margin of -10.91% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. Osisko Development's return on equity of -10.60% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	-189.60%	-10.60%	-16.19%
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 2 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Osisko Development and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat NanoXplore's score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	Positive
NanoXplore	Neutral

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.188337, indicating that its stock price is 119% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, indicating that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

NanoXplore has higher revenue and earnings than Osisko Development. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	C$37.69M	27.81	-C$332.96M	-C$0.49	N/A
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.64	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A

Summary

Osisko Development beats NanoXplore on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NanoXplore News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GRA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	NanoXplore	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$301.27M	C$21.50B	C$4.59B	C$12.38B
Dividend Yield	12.38%	4.06%	5.02%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	-20.50	20.97	22.63	35.81
Price / Sales	2.64	1.37	6,841.38	10.12
Price / Cash	9.22	7.49	24.12	82.29
Price / Book	2.59	1.70	8.75	4.45
Net Income	-C$11.17M	C$173.62M	C$157.33M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	2.50%	-0.88%	-1.62%	-0.08%
1 Month Performance	-18.41%	-3.34%	-7.68%	-2.43%
1 Year Performance	-31.95%	16.81%	47.51%	36.78%

NanoXplore Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GRA NanoXplore	1.8676 of 5 stars	C$1.64 -1.2%	C$4.00 +143.9%	-29.3%	C$301.27M	C$112.73M	N/A	450
MX Methanex	1.2902 of 5 stars	C$72.80 -2.5%	C$60.00 -17.6%	+48.0%	C$5.78B	C$3.67B	N/A	900	News Coverage
KRR Karora Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.20B	C$416.32M	134.00	210	Gap Up High Trading Volume
SLI Standard Lithium	0.072 of 5 stars	C$4.50 -6.1%	N/A	+51.1%	C$1.17B	N/A	N/A	N/A
PDL North American Palladium	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.16B	C$536.30M	6.29	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GRA) was last updated on 6/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. MX, KRR, SLI, PDL, and ODV

How does NanoXplore compare to Methanex?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Karora Resources?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Standard Lithium?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to North American Palladium?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. MX, KRR, SLI, PDL, and ODV

How does NanoXplore compare to Methanex?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, GRA or MX?

Is GRA or MX more profitable?

Does the media favor GRA or MX?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GRA or MX?

Which has more risk and volatility, GRA or MX?

Do analysts rate GRA or MX?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Karora Resources?

Which has more risk & volatility, GRA or KRR?

Do analysts rate GRA or KRR?

Is GRA or KRR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GRA or KRR?

Does the media favor GRA or KRR?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, GRA or KRR?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Standard Lithium?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GRA or SLI?

Do analysts prefer GRA or SLI?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GRA or SLI?

Is GRA or SLI more profitable?

Does the media favor GRA or SLI?

Which has more risk and volatility, GRA or SLI?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to North American Palladium?

Is GRA or PDL more profitable?

Does the media prefer GRA or PDL?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GRA or PDL?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GRA or PDL?

Do analysts rate GRA or PDL?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Osisko Development?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ODV or GRA?

Do analysts prefer ODV or GRA?

Is ODV or GRA more profitable?

Does the media favor ODV or GRA?

Which has more volatility and risk, ODV or GRA?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ODV or GRA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools