Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GRA or MX?

Methanex has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.88 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A Methanex C$3.67B 1.72 C$107.23M -C$0.73 N/A

Is GRA or MX more profitable?

Methanex has a net margin of -1.26% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Methanex's return on equity of -1.84% beat NanoXplore's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets NanoXplore -10.91% -11.76% -4.04% Methanex -1.26% -1.84% 1.99%

Do analysts recommend GRA or SLI?

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 123.46%. Given NanoXplore's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Standard Lithium. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Standard Lithium 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 4.00

Do analysts recommend NEXA or GRA?

NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 123.46%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Nexa Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nexa Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, NEXA or GRA?

Nexa Resources has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nexa Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nexa Resources C$2.58B 0.00 C$207.93M C$1.57 N/A NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.88 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A

Do analysts recommend III or GRA?

NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 123.46%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Imperial Metals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Imperial Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 NanoXplore 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, III or GRA?

Imperial Metals has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Imperial Metals C$669.73M 1.69 C$33.43M C$0.72 8.85 NanoXplore C$112.73M 2.88 -C$11.17M -C$0.08 N/A

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

C$1.79 -0.03 (-1.65%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

GRA vs. MX, SLI, NEXA, NEO, and III

Should you buy NanoXplore stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares NanoXplore with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with NanoXplore include Methanex (MX), Standard Lithium (SLI), Nexa Resources (NEXA), Neo Performance Materials (NEO), and Imperial Metals (III). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does NanoXplore compare to Methanex?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Methanex (TSE:MX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Methanex has a net margin of -1.26% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Methanex's return on equity of -1.84% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
Methanex	-1.26%	-1.84%	1.99%

NanoXplore presently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 123.46%. Methanex has a consensus price target of C$50.00, suggesting a potential downside of 38.61%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Methanex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Methanex	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, suggesting that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Methanex has a beta of 0.555104, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Methanex has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. Methanex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.88	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
Methanex	C$3.67B	1.72	C$107.23M	-C$0.73	N/A

In the previous week, Methanex had 2 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Methanex and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. Methanex's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat NanoXplore's score of 0.00 indicating that Methanex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
Methanex	Positive

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.4% of Methanex shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Methanex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Methanex beats NanoXplore on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Standard Lithium?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Standard Lithium (CVE:SLI) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, meaning that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Standard Lithium has a beta of 1.536856, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Standard Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Standard Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.88	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
Standard Lithium	N/A	N/A	C$152.14M	-C$0.23	N/A

NanoXplore currently has a consensus target price of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 123.46%. Given NanoXplore's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Standard Lithium.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Standard Lithium	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00

In the previous week, Standard Lithium had 4 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Standard Lithium and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Standard Lithium's score of -0.08 indicating that NanoXplore is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
Standard Lithium	Neutral

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Standard Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Standard Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Standard Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. NanoXplore's return on equity of -11.76% beat Standard Lithium's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
Standard Lithium	N/A	-15.68%	-10.09%

Summary

NanoXplore and Standard Lithium tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Nexa Resources?

Nexa Resources (TSE:NEXA) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Nexa Resources had 1 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nexa Resources and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Nexa Resources' score of -0.45 indicating that NanoXplore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nexa Resources	Neutral
NanoXplore	Neutral

NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 123.46%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Nexa Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nexa Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Nexa Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Nexa Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nexa Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nexa Resources has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nexa Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nexa Resources	C$2.58B	0.00	C$207.93M	C$1.57	N/A
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.88	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A

Summary

Nexa Resources beats NanoXplore on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus target price of C$38.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.90%. NanoXplore has a consensus target price of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 123.46%. Given NanoXplore's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.446369, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, suggesting that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NanoXplore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	2.87	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.88	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of -2.03% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of -2.63% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NanoXplore'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
NanoXplore	Neutral

18.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats NanoXplore on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does NanoXplore compare to Imperial Metals?

Imperial Metals (TSE:III) and NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Imperial Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NanoXplore'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Imperial Metals	Neutral
NanoXplore	Neutral

Imperial Metals has a beta of 0.818483, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NanoXplore has a beta of -0.011522, meaning that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

7.8% of Imperial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. 49.3% of Imperial Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NanoXplore has a consensus price target of C$4.00, indicating a potential upside of 123.46%. Given NanoXplore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Imperial Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Imperial Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Imperial Metals has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Metals	C$669.73M	1.69	C$33.43M	C$0.72	8.85
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.88	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A

Imperial Metals has a net margin of 18.94% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Imperial Metals' return on equity of 12.78% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Imperial Metals	18.94%	12.78%	0.74%
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%

Summary

Imperial Metals beats NanoXplore on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get NanoXplore News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GRA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	NanoXplore	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$330.31M	C$21.56B	C$4.69B	C$12.15B
Dividend Yield	12.38%	4.02%	4.99%	6.20%
P/E Ratio	-22.38	20.95	22.17	36.88
Price / Sales	2.88	1.54	7,028.69	10.43
Price / Cash	9.22	7.49	24.18	82.29
Price / Book	2.83	1.91	9.01	4.44
Net Income	-C$11.17M	C$173.62M	C$156.92M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-9.14%	-3.74%	-4.73%	-2.21%
1 Month Performance	-17.51%	-5.77%	-5.29%	-1.59%
1 Year Performance	-20.09%	17.46%	58.58%	44.91%

NanoXplore Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GRA NanoXplore	2.9766 of 5 stars	C$1.79 -1.6%	C$4.00 +123.5%	-18.8%	C$330.31M	C$112.73M	N/A	450
MX Methanex	2.3559 of 5 stars	C$85.85 +1.3%	C$50.00 -41.8%	+76.9%	C$6.55B	C$3.67B	N/A	900	Positive News
SLI Standard Lithium	0.0268 of 5 stars	C$5.76 +1.4%	N/A	+104.7%	C$1.39B	N/A	N/A	N/A	Insider Trade
NEXA Nexa Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.34B	C$2.58B	6.46	5,349	High Trading Volume
NEO Neo Performance Materials	1.5114 of 5 stars	C$35.72 +11.7%	C$38.00 +6.4%	+178.9%	C$1.34B	C$512.15M	N/A	2,100	Dividend Announcement

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GRA) was last updated on 6/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. MX, SLI, NEXA, NEO, and III

How does NanoXplore compare to Methanex?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Standard Lithium?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Nexa Resources?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Imperial Metals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

NanoXplore (GRA) Competitors

GRA vs. MX, SLI, NEXA, NEO, and III

How does NanoXplore compare to Methanex?

Is GRA or MX more profitable?

Do analysts rate GRA or MX?

Which has more volatility & risk, GRA or MX?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GRA or MX?

Does the media prefer GRA or MX?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GRA or MX?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Standard Lithium?

Which has more volatility and risk, GRA or SLI?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GRA or SLI?

Do analysts recommend GRA or SLI?

Does the media prefer GRA or SLI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GRA or SLI?

Is GRA or SLI more profitable?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Nexa Resources?

Does the media prefer NEXA or GRA?

Do analysts recommend NEXA or GRA?

Is NEXA or GRA more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NEXA or GRA?

Which has better earnings and valuation, NEXA or GRA?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Neo Performance Materials?

Do analysts rate NEO or GRA?

Which has more volatility & risk, NEO or GRA?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NEO or GRA?

Is NEO or GRA more profitable?

Does the media favor NEO or GRA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in NEO or GRA?

Summary

How does NanoXplore compare to Imperial Metals?

Does the media favor III or GRA?

Which has more volatility & risk, III or GRA?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in III or GRA?

Do analysts recommend III or GRA?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, III or GRA?

Is III or GRA more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GRA vs. The Competition

NanoXplore Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools