Free Trial

Brand Engagement Network (BNAI) Competitors

Brand Engagement Network logo
$22.34 -0.82 (-3.54%)
Closing price 05/15/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$22.27 -0.07 (-0.31%)
As of 05/15/2026 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BNAI vs. DCBO, GDYN, CINT, CCSI, and PUBM

Should you buy Brand Engagement Network stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Brand Engagement Network with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Brand Engagement Network include Docebo (DCBO), Grid Dynamics (GDYN), CI&T (CINT), Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI), and PubMatic (PUBM). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Brand Engagement Network compare to Docebo?

Brand Engagement Network (NASDAQ:BNAI) and Docebo (NASDAQ:DCBO) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Brand Engagement Network and Brand Engagement Network both had 2 articles in the media. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 2.46 beat Docebo's score of 0.55 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brand Engagement Network Very Positive
Docebo Positive

Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Docebo has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Docebo has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -3,137.73%. Docebo's return on equity of 93.49% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brand Engagement Network-3,137.73% -308.17% -73.77%
Docebo 13.71%93.49%17.82%

Docebo has a consensus target price of $30.92, suggesting a potential upside of 79.44%. Given Docebo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Docebo is more favorable than Brand Engagement Network.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brand Engagement Network
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Docebo
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94

Docebo has higher revenue and earnings than Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Docebo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brand Engagement Network$275.12K475.68-$8.62M-$6.50N/A
Docebo$242.69M1.80$37.51M$1.1614.85

15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Docebo shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Docebo beats Brand Engagement Network on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brand Engagement Network compare to Grid Dynamics?

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and Brand Engagement Network (NASDAQ:BNAI) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Grid Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.36$9.67M$0.05134.20
Brand Engagement Network$275.12K475.68-$8.62M-$6.50N/A

Grid Dynamics has a net margin of 1.27% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -3,137.73%. Grid Dynamics' return on equity of 1.20% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grid Dynamics1.27% 1.20% 1.05%
Brand Engagement Network -3,137.73%-308.17%-73.77%

Grid Dynamics presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.03%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Brand Engagement Network.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Grid Dynamics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Brand Engagement Network
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Grid Dynamics had 2 more articles in the media than Brand Engagement Network. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Grid Dynamics and 2 mentions for Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 2.46 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.52 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Grid Dynamics Positive
Brand Engagement Network Very Positive

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats Brand Engagement Network on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brand Engagement Network compare to CI&T?

CI&T (NYSE:CINT) and Brand Engagement Network (NASDAQ:BNAI) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, CI&T had 11 more articles in the media than Brand Engagement Network. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CI&T and 2 mentions for Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 2.46 beat CI&T's score of -0.23 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CI&T Neutral
Brand Engagement Network Very Positive

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CI&T, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CI&T$489.65M1.02$40.62M$0.3112.03
Brand Engagement Network$275.12K475.68-$8.62M-$6.50N/A

92.5% of CI&T shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CI&T has a net margin of 7.90% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -3,137.73%. CI&T's return on equity of 13.19% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CI&T7.90% 13.19% 7.32%
Brand Engagement Network -3,137.73%-308.17%-73.77%

CI&T has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

CI&T presently has a consensus target price of $6.80, indicating a potential upside of 82.35%. Given CI&T's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CI&T is more favorable than Brand Engagement Network.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CI&T
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Brand Engagement Network
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

CI&T beats Brand Engagement Network on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brand Engagement Network compare to Consensus Cloud Solutions?

Consensus Cloud Solutions (NASDAQ:CCSI) and Brand Engagement Network (NASDAQ:BNAI) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Consensus Cloud Solutions has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -3,137.73%. Consensus Cloud Solutions' return on equity of 5,736.13% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Consensus Cloud Solutions25.09% 5,736.13% 14.38%
Brand Engagement Network -3,137.73%-308.17%-73.77%

93.9% of Consensus Cloud Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Consensus Cloud Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Consensus Cloud Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $36.67, indicating a potential upside of 29.47%. Given Consensus Cloud Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Consensus Cloud Solutions is more favorable than Brand Engagement Network.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Consensus Cloud Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Brand Engagement Network
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Consensus Cloud Solutions has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Consensus Cloud Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Consensus Cloud Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Consensus Cloud Solutions$351.03M1.48$84.53M$4.586.18
Brand Engagement Network$275.12K475.68-$8.62M-$6.50N/A

In the previous week, Consensus Cloud Solutions and Consensus Cloud Solutions both had 2 articles in the media. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 2.46 beat Consensus Cloud Solutions' score of 0.77 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Consensus Cloud Solutions Positive
Brand Engagement Network Very Positive

Summary

Consensus Cloud Solutions beats Brand Engagement Network on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brand Engagement Network compare to PubMatic?

Brand Engagement Network (NASDAQ:BNAI) and PubMatic (NASDAQ:PUBM) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

15.8% of Brand Engagement Network shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of PubMatic shares are held by institutional investors. 25.6% of Brand Engagement Network shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.8% of PubMatic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brand Engagement Network has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PubMatic. PubMatic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brand Engagement Network, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brand Engagement Network$275.12K475.68-$8.62M-$6.50N/A
PubMatic$282.93M1.60-$14.46M-$0.38N/A

PubMatic has a net margin of -6.21% compared to Brand Engagement Network's net margin of -3,137.73%. PubMatic's return on equity of -6.98% beat Brand Engagement Network's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brand Engagement Network-3,137.73% -308.17% -73.77%
PubMatic -6.21%-6.98%-2.60%

Brand Engagement Network has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PubMatic has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PubMatic had 5 more articles in the media than Brand Engagement Network. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PubMatic and 2 mentions for Brand Engagement Network. Brand Engagement Network's average media sentiment score of 2.46 beat PubMatic's score of 0.78 indicating that Brand Engagement Network is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brand Engagement Network Very Positive
PubMatic Positive

PubMatic has a consensus target price of $12.88, indicating a potential upside of 32.46%. Given PubMatic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PubMatic is more favorable than Brand Engagement Network.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brand Engagement Network
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
PubMatic
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Summary

PubMatic beats Brand Engagement Network on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brand Engagement Network News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BNAI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BNAI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BNAI vs. The Competition

MetricBrand Engagement NetworkTechnology Services IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$130.87M$3.92B$6.41B$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/A2.16%3.18%5.25%
P/E Ratio-3.4453.2131.0725.24
Price / Sales475.6847.02417.7282.47
Price / CashN/A40.2123.2956.04
Price / Book37.235.366.756.90
Net Income-$8.62M$32.30M$203.22M$334.66M
7 Day Performance0.36%8.21%1.82%0.13%
1 Month Performance-43.01%-3.85%-3.01%1.11%
1 Year Performance659.86%27.19%31.11%30.62%

Brand Engagement Network Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BNAI
Brand Engagement Network
0.5967 of 5 stars
$22.34
-3.5%
N/A+648.2%$130.87M$275.12KN/A26
DCBO
Docebo
4.3751 of 5 stars
$20.29
-4.3%
$30.92
+52.4%
-34.8%$521.45M$242.69M15.98730
GDYN
Grid Dynamics
4.3446 of 5 stars
$6.10
+4.5%
$10.00
+63.9%
-53.3%$520.66M$415.51M122.024,961
CINT
CI&T
4.6358 of 5 stars
$3.87
-3.3%
$7.28
+88.1%
-42.4%$520.42M$489.65M12.897,993
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions
3.8092 of 5 stars
$27.58
-0.3%
$37.50
+36.0%
+21.2%$507.47M$349.70M6.34460

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BNAI) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners