Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free CRGY Stock Alerts

Crescent Energy (CRGY) Competitors

Crescent Energy logo
$14.07 +0.26 (+1.88%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Compare

CRGY vs. APA, CHRD, FANG, MGY, and MTDR

Should you buy Crescent Energy stock or one of its competitors? Crescent Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include APA (APA), Chord Energy (CHRD), Diamondback Energy (FANG), Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY), and Matador Resources (MTDR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Crescent Energy compare to APA?

APA (NASDAQ:APA) and Crescent Energy (NYSE:CRGY) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

APA currently has a consensus price target of $41.50, indicating a potential downside of 4.36%. Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $16.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.09%. Given Crescent Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than APA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
APA
4 Sell rating(s)
16 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Crescent Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

APA has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than APA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
APA$9.22B1.65$1.43B$4.739.17
Crescent Energy$3.58B1.30$132.91M-$0.05N/A

APA has a net margin of 19.48% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. APA's return on equity of 24.84% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
APA19.48% 24.84% 10.15%
Crescent Energy 1.27%10.52%4.44%

83.0% of APA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of APA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

APA pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. APA pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

APA has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, APA had 38 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for APA and 1 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat APA's score of 0.83 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
APA
14 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Crescent Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

APA beats Crescent Energy on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crescent Energy compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and Crescent Energy (NYSE:CRGY) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Chord Energy and 1 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.92 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Crescent Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Crescent Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy$4.88B1.66$44.46M$14.929.91
Crescent Energy$3.58B1.30$132.91M-$0.05N/A

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 10.52% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chord Energy13.42% 10.18% 6.24%
Crescent Energy 1.27%10.52%4.44%

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy currently has a consensus target price of $152.54, indicating a potential upside of 3.17%. Crescent Energy has a consensus target price of $16.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.09%. Given Crescent Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chord Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Crescent Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Summary

Chord Energy beats Crescent Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crescent Energy compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Crescent Energy (NYSE:CRGY) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.93$1.66B$5.1341.08
Crescent Energy$3.58B1.30$132.91M-$0.05N/A

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 60 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 61 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 1 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.18 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
42 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Crescent Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $222.21, indicating a potential upside of 5.45%. Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $16.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.09%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
Crescent Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 10.52% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy8.58% 10.10% 6.16%
Crescent Energy 1.27%10.52%4.44%

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Crescent Energy on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crescent Energy compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Crescent Energy (NYSE:CRGY) and Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Crescent Energy currently has a consensus target price of $16.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.09%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.62, indicating a potential upside of 12.11%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Magnolia Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Energy$3.58B1.30$132.91M-$0.05N/A
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.31B5.09$325.25M$2.2812.37

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Energy1.27% 10.52% 4.44%
Magnolia Oil & Gas 28.77%21.04%14.46%

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 16 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 1 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 1.10 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crescent Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Magnolia Oil & Gas
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats Crescent Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crescent Energy compare to Matador Resources?

Crescent Energy (NYSE:CRGY) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 30 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Matador Resources and 1 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.77 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crescent Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Matador Resources
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Energy$3.58B1.30$132.91M-$0.05N/A
Matador Resources$3.70B1.96$759.22M$5.8310.04

Crescent Energy currently has a consensus price target of $16.33, indicating a potential upside of 16.09%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $66.07, indicating a potential upside of 12.92%. Given Crescent Energy's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crescent Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Matador Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crescent Energy1.27% 10.52% 4.44%
Matador Resources 19.85%13.18%6.46%

Summary

Matador Resources beats Crescent Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Crescent Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRGY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRGY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRGY vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCrescent EnergyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.65B$11.49B$10.03B$24.30B
Dividend Yield3.41%11.41%11.64%3.70%
P/E Ratio-281.3417.1920.6230.31
Price / Sales1.30494.35405.5019.89
Price / Cash3.1539.8836.2632.49
Price / Book0.903.213.036.77
Net Income$132.91M$5.27B$4.33B$1.07B
7 Day Performance15.38%2.69%1.89%-0.65%
1 Month Performance23.49%4.21%3.84%3.38%
1 Year Performance41.66%37.09%38.56%14.90%

Crescent Energy Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRGY
Crescent Energy
3.6494 of 5 stars		$14.07
+1.9%		$16.33
+16.1%		+41.7%$4.65B$3.58BN/A1,066
APA
APA
3.5138 of 5 stars		$41.58
+2.7%		$41.26
-0.8%		+100.5%$14.18B$8.81B8.791,791
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.313 of 5 stars		$142.88
+4.0%		$152.54
+6.8%		+39.6%$7.51B$4.88B9.58530
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.8377 of 5 stars		$206.29
+1.9%		$221.75
+7.5%		+47.1%$56.70B$15.03B40.211,762
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas
4.4463 of 5 stars		$26.77
+2.0%		$31.62
+18.1%		+16.4%$6.22B$1.48B11.74210

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CRGY) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel