Crescent Energy (CRGY) Competitors

Chord Energy presently has a consensus price target of $152.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.45%. Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $15.82, indicating a potential upside of 59.38%. Given Crescent Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Chord Energy and 5 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.92 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chord Energy has a net margin of -1.25% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 8.10% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Crescent Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crescent Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 18 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Devon Energy and 5 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Devon Energy's score of 0.92 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Crescent Energy currently has a consensus price target of $15.82, indicating a potential upside of 59.38%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $59.56, indicating a potential upside of 38.45%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 2 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 5 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.77 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $31.08, indicating a potential upside of 17.29%. Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $15.82, indicating a potential upside of 59.38%. Given Crescent Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 11 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Matador Resources and 5 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Matador Resources' score of -0.30 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus target price of $64.38, indicating a potential upside of 22.53%. Crescent Energy has a consensus target price of $15.82, indicating a potential upside of 59.38%. Given Crescent Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.