Crescent Energy (CRGY) Competitors

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crescent Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crescent Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy has a net margin of -1.25% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 8.10% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Chord Energy and 12 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.52 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Chord Energy currently has a consensus price target of $156.15, indicating a potential upside of 9.09%. Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $15.73, indicating a potential upside of 24.51%. Given Crescent Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Crescent Energy presently has a consensus price target of $15.73, suggesting a potential upside of 24.51%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $218.25, suggesting a potential upside of 8.30%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 488.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 8.10% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 17 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 12 mentions for Crescent Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Crescent Energy's score of 0.95 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 24.40% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 16.28% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Crescent Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Crescent Energy and 6 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.62 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 38.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Energy presently has a consensus price target of $15.73, suggesting a potential upside of 24.51%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.26%. Given Crescent Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 14.41% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of -7.47%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 11.20% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Matador Resources and 12 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.60 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Crescent Energy pays out -64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Matador Resources has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Energy presently has a consensus price target of $15.73, suggesting a potential upside of 24.51%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $63.46, suggesting a potential upside of 9.51%. Given Crescent Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.