Crescent Energy (CRGY) Competitors

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Chord Energy and 10 mentions for Crescent Energy. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Crescent Energy's score of 0.99 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 10.52% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chord Energy presently has a consensus price target of $155.50, indicating a potential upside of 2.30%. Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $16.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.10%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Crescent Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Devon Energy and 10 mentions for Crescent Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Crescent Energy's score of 0.99 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 16.67% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 14.93% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Crescent Energy presently has a consensus target price of $16.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.10%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $59.30, suggesting a potential upside of 18.15%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Crescent Energy.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Crescent Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Magnolia Oil & Gas. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Crescent Energy and 8 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.48 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Crescent Energy presently has a consensus price target of $16.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.10%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.71, indicating a potential upside of 14.35%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Crescent Energy.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Matador Resources and 10 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.56 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus price target of $65.93, indicating a potential upside of 7.92%. Crescent Energy has a consensus price target of $16.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.10%. Given Crescent Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.