Crescent Energy (CRGY) Competitors

Chord Energy presently has a consensus target price of $165.54, suggesting a potential upside of 20.82%. Crescent Energy has a consensus target price of $17.08, suggesting a potential upside of 27.54%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Crescent Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chord Energy has a net margin of 13.42% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 10.52% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Chord Energy and Chord Energy both had 2 articles in the media. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Crescent Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Crescent Energy currently has a consensus price target of $17.08, indicating a potential upside of 27.54%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $226.33, indicating a potential upside of 22.53%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 2 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.68 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Crescent Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 8.58% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Crescent Energy's return on equity of 10.52% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a net margin of 28.77% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity of 21.04% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 11 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 2 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.38 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crescent Energy presently has a consensus price target of $17.08, suggesting a potential upside of 27.54%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus price target of $31.88, suggesting a potential upside of 32.64%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Crescent Energy.

Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

92.0% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Crescent Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Matador Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Crescent Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Crescent Energy's net margin of 1.27%. Matador Resources' return on equity of 13.18% beat Crescent Energy's return on equity.

Matador Resources has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crescent Energy has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Matador Resources presently has a consensus target price of $66.80, indicating a potential upside of 24.67%. Crescent Energy has a consensus target price of $17.08, indicating a potential upside of 27.54%. Given Crescent Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Energy is more favorable than Matador Resources.

In the previous week, Matador Resources had 18 more articles in the media than Crescent Energy. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Matador Resources and 2 mentions for Crescent Energy. Crescent Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Matador Resources' score of 0.45 indicating that Crescent Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Crescent Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Matador Resources pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Energy pays out -960.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Matador Resources has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Crescent Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Crescent Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.