Haverty Furniture Companies (HVT) Competitors

80.6% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Ethan Allen Interiors shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of Ethan Allen Interiors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a consensus target price of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.42%. Given Ethan Allen Interiors' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ethan Allen Interiors is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies.

Haverty Furniture Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Ethan Allen Interiors pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Haverty Furniture Companies pays out 112.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ethan Allen Interiors pays out 98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Haverty Furniture Companies has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Ethan Allen Interiors has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Ethan Allen Interiors is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ethan Allen Interiors has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Haverty Furniture Companies. Ethan Allen Interiors is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haverty Furniture Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Ethan Allen Interiors had 8 more articles in the media than Haverty Furniture Companies. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Ethan Allen Interiors and 12 mentions for Haverty Furniture Companies. Ethan Allen Interiors' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Haverty Furniture Companies' score of 0.13 indicating that Ethan Allen Interiors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ethan Allen Interiors has a net margin of 6.81% compared to Haverty Furniture Companies' net margin of 2.60%. Ethan Allen Interiors' return on equity of 8.54% beat Haverty Furniture Companies' return on equity.

Haverty Furniture Companies has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ethan Allen Interiors has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $39.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.67%. Given La-Z-Boy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe La-Z-Boy is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies.

Haverty Furniture Companies has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Haverty Furniture Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. La-Z-Boy pays an annual dividend of $0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Haverty Furniture Companies pays out 112.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. La-Z-Boy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Haverty Furniture Companies has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and La-Z-Boy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Haverty Furniture Companies had 8 more articles in the media than La-Z-Boy. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Haverty Furniture Companies and 4 mentions for La-Z-Boy. La-Z-Boy's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Haverty Furniture Companies' score of 0.13 indicating that La-Z-Boy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

80.6% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.6% of La-Z-Boy shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of La-Z-Boy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

La-Z-Boy has a net margin of 3.93% compared to Haverty Furniture Companies' net margin of 2.60%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 10.79% beat Haverty Furniture Companies' return on equity.

La-Z-Boy has higher revenue and earnings than Haverty Furniture Companies. La-Z-Boy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haverty Furniture Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Haverty Furniture Companies has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brand House Collective has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Haverty Furniture Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brand House Collective. Brand House Collective is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haverty Furniture Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Haverty Furniture Companies has a net margin of 2.60% compared to Brand House Collective's net margin of -6.79%. Haverty Furniture Companies' return on equity of 6.45% beat Brand House Collective's return on equity.

80.6% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Brand House Collective shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Brand House Collective shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Haverty Furniture Companies had 12 more articles in the media than Brand House Collective. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Haverty Furniture Companies and 0 mentions for Brand House Collective. Haverty Furniture Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Brand House Collective's score of 0.00 indicating that Haverty Furniture Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Haverty Furniture Companies has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Williams-Sonoma has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Haverty Furniture Companies had 6 more articles in the media than Williams-Sonoma. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Haverty Furniture Companies and 6 mentions for Williams-Sonoma. Williams-Sonoma's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Haverty Furniture Companies' score of 0.13 indicating that Williams-Sonoma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Williams-Sonoma has a consensus price target of $209.56, suggesting a potential upside of 16.28%. Given Williams-Sonoma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Williams-Sonoma is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies.

Haverty Furniture Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Williams-Sonoma pays an annual dividend of $2.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Haverty Furniture Companies pays out 112.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Williams-Sonoma pays out 29.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Haverty Furniture Companies has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Williams-Sonoma has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years.

Williams-Sonoma has higher revenue and earnings than Haverty Furniture Companies. Haverty Furniture Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Williams-Sonoma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Williams-Sonoma has a net margin of 13.94% compared to Haverty Furniture Companies' net margin of 2.60%. Williams-Sonoma's return on equity of 51.45% beat Haverty Furniture Companies' return on equity.

80.6% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Williams-Sonoma shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Williams-Sonoma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.