Free Trial

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

Regional Management logo
$36.41 +0.22 (+0.62%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$36.24 -0.17 (-0.46%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RM vs. WRLD, GDOT, PRAA, AXP, and COF

Should you buy Regional Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Regional Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Regional Management include World Acceptance (WRLD), Green Dot (GDOT), PRA Group (PRAA), American Express (AXP), and Capital One Financial (COF). These companies are all part of the "consumer finance" industry.

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and World Acceptance (NASDAQ:WRLD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Regional Management has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, World Acceptance has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of 5.98%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat World Acceptance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional Management7.40% 13.16% 2.39%
World Acceptance 5.98%9.36%3.27%

Regional Management currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.58%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Regional Management is more favorable than World Acceptance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
World Acceptance
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Regional Management has higher revenue and earnings than World Acceptance. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than World Acceptance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management$645.60M0.52$44.41M$4.937.39
World Acceptance$585.74M1.36$34.59M$7.3823.22

In the previous week, World Acceptance had 3 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for World Acceptance and 1 mentions for Regional Management. World Acceptance's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Regional Management's score of 0.64 indicating that World Acceptance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regional Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
World Acceptance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of World Acceptance shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.6% of World Acceptance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Regional Management and World Acceptance tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Green Dot?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and Green Dot (NYSE:GDOT) are both small-cap consumer finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to Green Dot's net margin of -3.25%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat Green Dot's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional Management7.40% 13.16% 2.39%
Green Dot -3.25%7.56%1.16%

Regional Management has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Green Dot has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Regional Management and Regional Management both had 1 articles in the media. Green Dot's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Regional Management's score of 0.64 indicating that Green Dot is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regional Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Green Dot
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Regional Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Green Dot. Green Dot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management$645.60M0.52$44.41M$4.937.39
Green Dot$2.08B0.35-$98.87M-$1.32N/A

98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Green Dot shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Green Dot shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Regional Management currently has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.58%. Green Dot has a consensus price target of $14.75, suggesting a potential upside of 14.39%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Regional Management is more favorable than Green Dot.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Green Dot
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Regional Management beats Green Dot on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to PRA Group?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and PRA Group (NASDAQ:PRAA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of PRA Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of PRA Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to PRA Group's net margin of -22.51%. PRA Group's return on equity of 13.19% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional Management7.40% 13.16% 2.39%
PRA Group -22.51%13.19%2.85%

Regional Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PRA Group. PRA Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management$645.60M0.52$44.41M$4.937.39
PRA Group$1.20B0.48-$305.14M-$7.16N/A

Regional Management presently has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.58%. PRA Group has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.04%. Given PRA Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PRA Group is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
PRA Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Regional Management has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PRA Group has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PRA Group had 1 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for PRA Group and 1 mentions for Regional Management. PRA Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Regional Management's score of 0.64 indicating that PRA Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regional Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PRA Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Regional Management beats PRA Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to American Express?

American Express (NYSE:AXP) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

American Express pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. American Express pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional Management pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Express has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

American Express has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Express, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Express$72.23B2.96$10.83B$16.0319.57
Regional Management$645.60M0.52$44.41M$4.937.39

American Express has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

American Express presently has a consensus target price of $359.05, suggesting a potential upside of 14.43%. Regional Management has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.58%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Regional Management is more favorable than American Express.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
American Express
1 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

American Express has a net margin of 15.13% compared to Regional Management's net margin of 7.40%. American Express' return on equity of 33.95% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
American Express15.13% 33.95% 3.73%
Regional Management 7.40%13.16%2.39%

84.3% of American Express shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of American Express shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, American Express had 51 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 52 mentions for American Express and 1 mentions for Regional Management. American Express' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Regional Management's score of 0.64 indicating that American Express is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
American Express
34 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Regional Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

American Express beats Regional Management on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Capital One Financial?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and Capital One Financial (NYSE:COF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Regional Management has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital One Financial has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capital One Financial had 31 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Capital One Financial and 1 mentions for Regional Management. Capital One Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Regional Management's score of 0.64 indicating that Capital One Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regional Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Capital One Financial
23 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Capital One Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Capital One Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Regional Management presently has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.58%. Capital One Financial has a consensus price target of $258.75, suggesting a potential upside of 45.47%. Given Capital One Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capital One Financial is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Capital One Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77

Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Capital One Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Regional Management pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital One Financial pays out 112.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regional Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Capital One Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital One Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management$645.60M0.52$44.41M$4.937.39
Capital One Financial$69.25B1.60$2.45B$2.8562.41

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to Capital One Financial's net margin of 4.29%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat Capital One Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional Management7.40% 13.16% 2.39%
Capital One Financial 4.29%10.59%1.78%

Summary

Capital One Financial beats Regional Management on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Regional Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RM vs. The Competition

MetricRegional ManagementFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$333.24M$10.06B$13.57B$23.11B
Dividend Yield3.32%5.30%5.77%4.08%
P/E Ratio7.3914.3319.9730.13
Price / Sales0.521.60136.2820.96
Price / Cash7.829.0319.3124.21
Price / Book0.951.802.204.59
Net Income$44.41M$421.66M$1.14B$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.58%2.11%1.24%-0.60%
1 Month Performance3.14%0.18%-0.13%-1.14%
1 Year Performance27.92%14.40%10.17%18.94%

Regional Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RM
Regional Management
3.8378 of 5 stars
$36.41
+0.6%
$45.00
+23.6%
+30.2%$333.24M$645.60M7.392,112
WRLD
World Acceptance
1.2398 of 5 stars
$167.80
+1.0%
N/A+7.5%$820.56M$585.74M22.742,838
GDOT
Green Dot
2.3107 of 5 stars
$12.82
+3.1%
$14.75
+15.0%
+24.2%$705.10M$2.08BN/A1,150
PRAA
PRA Group
3.1422 of 5 stars
$15.04
+7.3%
$25.00
+66.2%
+6.1%$534.73M$1.20BN/A2,615
AXP
American Express
4.6027 of 5 stars
$312.98
+4.1%
$359.05
+14.7%
+5.7%$205.09B$72.23B19.5276,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:RM) was last updated on 6/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners