Does the media prefer RM or UPBD?

In the previous week, Regional Management had 6 more articles in the media than Upbound Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 3 mentions for Upbound Group. Upbound Group's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Regional Management's score of 0.30 indicating that Upbound Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Regional Management 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Upbound Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor LU or RM?

In the previous week, Regional Management had 7 more articles in the media than Lufax. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 2 mentions for Lufax. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Lufax's score of -0.22 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lufax 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Regional Management 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, RM or QFIN?

Qfin has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Qfin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Regional Management $645.60M 0.45 $44.41M $4.75 6.61 Qfin $2.75B 0.36 $856.52M $4.16 1.94

Does the media prefer RM or QFIN?

In the previous week, Regional Management had 6 more articles in the media than Qfin. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 3 mentions for Qfin. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Qfin's score of -0.33 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Regional Management 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Qfin 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer WRLD or RM?

Regional Management has a consensus price target of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.01%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Regional Management is more favorable than World Acceptance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score World Acceptance 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Regional Management 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media refer more to WRLD or RM?

In the previous week, Regional Management had 8 more articles in the media than World Acceptance. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 1 mentions for World Acceptance. World Acceptance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Regional Management's score of 0.30 indicating that World Acceptance is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment World Acceptance 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Regional Management 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer RM or NAVI?

In the previous week, Regional Management had 2 more articles in the media than Navient. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 7 mentions for Navient. Navient's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Regional Management's score of 0.30 indicating that Navient is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Regional Management 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Navient 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

$31.38 -0.72 (-2.23%)

Closing price 09/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$31.39 +0.00 (+0.02%)

As of 09/18/2026 04:15 PM Eastern

Compare

RM vs. UPBD, LU, QFIN, WRLD, and NAVI

Should you buy Regional Management stock or one of its competitors? Regional Management's main competitors and comparable companies include Upbound Group (UPBD), Lufax (LU), Qfin (QFIN), World Acceptance (WRLD), and Navient (NAVI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer finance" industry.

How does Regional Management compare to Upbound Group?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and Upbound Group (NASDAQ:UPBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Regional Management has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Upbound Group's net margin of 1.90%. Upbound Group's return on equity of 34.53% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Regional Management	6.98%	12.49%	2.25%
Upbound Group	1.90%	34.53%	7.69%

Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Upbound Group pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Regional Management pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Upbound Group pays out 101.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Upbound Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Upbound Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Regional Management had 6 more articles in the media than Upbound Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 3 mentions for Upbound Group. Upbound Group's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Regional Management's score of 0.30 indicating that Upbound Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Regional Management	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Upbound Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Regional Management has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Upbound Group has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional Management currently has a consensus price target of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.01%. Upbound Group has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 63.46%. Given Upbound Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Upbound Group is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Upbound Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Upbound Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Upbound Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Upbound Group has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Upbound Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.45	$44.41M	$4.75	6.61
Upbound Group	$4.70B	0.21	$73.24M	$1.54	11.12

Summary

Upbound Group beats Regional Management on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Lufax?

Lufax (NYSE:LU) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Lufax currently has a consensus price target of $1.70, indicating a potential upside of 42.26%. Regional Management has a consensus price target of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.01%. Given Lufax's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Lufax is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lufax	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Lufax has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Regional Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lufax. Lufax is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lufax	$3.77B	0.27	-$291.79M	-$0.61	N/A
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.45	$44.41M	$4.75	6.61

69.1% of Lufax shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Regional Management had 7 more articles in the media than Lufax. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 2 mentions for Lufax. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Lufax's score of -0.22 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lufax	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Regional Management	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Regional Management has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Lufax's net margin of 0.00%. Regional Management's return on equity of 12.49% beat Lufax's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lufax	N/A	N/A	N/A
Regional Management	6.98%	12.49%	2.25%

Summary

Regional Management beats Lufax on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Qfin?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and Qfin (NASDAQ:QFIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and risk.

98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.8% of Qfin shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Qfin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Regional Management had 6 more articles in the media than Qfin. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 3 mentions for Qfin. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Qfin's score of -0.33 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Regional Management	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Qfin	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Regional Management presently has a consensus target price of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.01%. Qfin has a consensus target price of $12.29, indicating a potential upside of 51.90%. Given Qfin's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Qfin is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Qfin	4 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.63

Qfin has a net margin of 22.23% compared to Regional Management's net margin of 6.98%. Qfin's return on equity of 15.23% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Regional Management	6.98%	12.49%	2.25%
Qfin	22.23%	15.23%	6.60%

Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Qfin pays an annual dividend of $0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. Regional Management pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Qfin pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Qfin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Qfin has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Qfin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.45	$44.41M	$4.75	6.61
Qfin	$2.75B	0.36	$856.52M	$4.16	1.94

Regional Management has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Qfin has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Regional Management and Qfin tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

World Acceptance (NASDAQ:WRLD) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Regional Management has higher revenue and earnings than World Acceptance. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than World Acceptance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
World Acceptance	$585.74M	1.45	$34.59M	$8.46	21.53
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.45	$44.41M	$4.75	6.61

Regional Management has a net margin of 6.98% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of 6.71%. Regional Management's return on equity of 12.49% beat World Acceptance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
World Acceptance	6.71%	12.13%	4.00%
Regional Management	6.98%	12.49%	2.25%

83.6% of World Acceptance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. 38.0% of World Acceptance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Regional Management has a consensus price target of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.01%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Regional Management is more favorable than World Acceptance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
World Acceptance	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

World Acceptance has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

In the previous week, Regional Management had 8 more articles in the media than World Acceptance. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 1 mentions for World Acceptance. World Acceptance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Regional Management's score of 0.30 indicating that World Acceptance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
World Acceptance	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Regional Management	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Regional Management beats World Acceptance on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Navient?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and Navient (NASDAQ:NAVI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Regional Management has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Navient has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Navient shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 33.8% of Navient shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Regional Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Navient. Navient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.45	$44.41M	$4.75	6.61
Navient	$3.20B	0.28	-$80M	-$0.50	N/A

Regional Management currently has a consensus price target of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.01%. Navient has a consensus price target of $9.14, indicating a potential downside of 3.86%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Regional Management is more favorable than Navient.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Navient	4 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.56

In the previous week, Regional Management had 2 more articles in the media than Navient. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Regional Management and 7 mentions for Navient. Navient's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Regional Management's score of 0.30 indicating that Navient is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Regional Management	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Navient	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Regional Management has a net margin of 6.98% compared to Navient's net margin of -1.64%. Regional Management's return on equity of 12.49% beat Navient's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Regional Management	6.98%	12.49%	2.25%
Navient	-1.64%	4.68%	0.23%

Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Navient pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Regional Management pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Navient pays out -128.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Navient is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Regional Management beats Navient on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Regional Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Regional Management	Consumer Finance Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$289.60M	$6.98B	$13.82B	$23.10B
Dividend Yield	3.82%	12.77%	5.95%	3.62%
P/E Ratio	6.61	8.78	25.31	28.21
Price / Sales	0.45	63.66	511.07	20.34
Price / Cash	6.78	11.36	43.42	36.36
Price / Book	0.82	2.53	2.73	4.67
Net Income	$44.41M	$442.63M	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-4.57%	-0.78%	-0.59%	-1.64%
1 Month Performance	-6.00%	-2.87%	0.16%	-3.60%
1 Year Performance	-28.50%	-0.83%	7.82%	8.41%

Regional Management Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RM Regional Management	4.7517 of 5 stars	$31.39 -2.2%	$43.00 +37.0%	-28.5%	$289.60M	$645.60M	6.61	2,112	News Coverage Insider Trade High Trading Volume
UPBD Upbound Group	4.5188 of 5 stars	$18.45 +1.3%	$30.67 +66.3%	-35.5%	$1.08B	$4.70B	12.06	12,050
LU Lufax	2.799 of 5 stars	$1.23 +1.2%	$1.70 +38.8%	-64.0%	$1.06B	$3.77B	N/A	33,163
QFIN Qfin	4.8398 of 5 stars	$8.58 +1.2%	$12.29 +43.3%	-73.3%	$1.04B	$2.75B	2.06	3,557
WRLD World Acceptance	1.386 of 5 stars	$191.43 +0.8%	N/A	+5.8%	$890.55M	$585.74M	22.59	2,907	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:RM) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

RM vs. UPBD, LU, QFIN, WRLD, and NAVI

How does Regional Management compare to Upbound Group?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Lufax?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Qfin?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Navient?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RM vs. The Competition

Regional Management Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

RM vs. UPBD, LU, QFIN, WRLD, and NAVI

How does Regional Management compare to Upbound Group?

Is RM or UPBD more profitable?

Is RM or UPBD a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer RM or UPBD?

Which has more volatility & risk, RM or UPBD?

Do analysts recommend RM or UPBD?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of RM or UPBD?

Which has better earnings & valuation, RM or UPBD?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Lufax?

Do analysts recommend LU or RM?

Which has more risk & volatility, LU or RM?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, LU or RM?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in LU or RM?

Does the media favor LU or RM?

Is LU or RM more profitable?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Qfin?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of RM or QFIN?

Does the media prefer RM or QFIN?

Do analysts prefer RM or QFIN?

Is RM or QFIN more profitable?

Is RM or QFIN a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, RM or QFIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, RM or QFIN?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, WRLD or RM?

Is WRLD or RM more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in WRLD or RM?

Do analysts prefer WRLD or RM?

Which has more volatility and risk, WRLD or RM?

Does the media refer more to WRLD or RM?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Navient?

Which has more volatility and risk, RM or NAVI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of RM or NAVI?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, RM or NAVI?

Do analysts prefer RM or NAVI?

Does the media prefer RM or NAVI?

Is RM or NAVI more profitable?

Is RM or NAVI a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RM vs. The Competition

Regional Management Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools