Do analysts prefer WRLD or RM?

Regional Management has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.62%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Regional Management is more favorable than World Acceptance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score World Acceptance 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Regional Management 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media prefer WRLD or RM?

In the previous week, World Acceptance and World Acceptance both had 3 articles in the media. World Acceptance's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that World Acceptance is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment World Acceptance 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Regional Management 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer RM or GDOT?

In the previous week, Regional Management and Regional Management both had 3 articles in the media. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Green Dot's score of -0.47 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Regional Management 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Green Dot 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer RM or PRAA?

In the previous week, Regional Management and Regional Management both had 3 articles in the media. PRA Group's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that PRA Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Regional Management 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PRA Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media refer more to AXP or RM?

In the previous week, American Express had 50 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for American Express and 3 mentions for Regional Management. American Express' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that American Express is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment American Express 34 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Regional Management 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor COF or RM?

In the previous week, Capital One Financial had 34 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Capital One Financial and 3 mentions for Regional Management. Capital One Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that Capital One Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Capital One Financial 27 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Regional Management 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

$41.63 +0.03 (+0.06%)

As of 11:25 AM Eastern

Compare

RM vs. WRLD, GDOT, PRAA, AXP, and COF

Should you buy Regional Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Regional Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Regional Management include World Acceptance (WRLD), Green Dot (GDOT), PRA Group (PRAA), American Express (AXP), and Capital One Financial (COF). These companies are all part of the "consumer finance" industry.

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

World Acceptance (NASDAQ:WRLD) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Regional Management has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.62%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Regional Management is more favorable than World Acceptance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
World Acceptance	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, World Acceptance and World Acceptance both had 3 articles in the media. World Acceptance's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that World Acceptance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
World Acceptance	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Regional Management	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

83.6% of World Acceptance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of World Acceptance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

World Acceptance has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of 5.98%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat World Acceptance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
World Acceptance	5.98%	9.36%	3.27%
Regional Management	7.40%	13.16%	2.39%

Regional Management has higher revenue and earnings than World Acceptance. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than World Acceptance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
World Acceptance	$585.74M	1.45	$34.59M	$7.38	24.87
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.59	$44.41M	$4.93	8.40

Summary

Regional Management beats World Acceptance on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Green Dot?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and Green Dot (NYSE:GDOT) are both small-cap consumer finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to Green Dot's net margin of -3.25%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat Green Dot's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Regional Management	7.40%	13.16%	2.39%
Green Dot	-3.25%	7.56%	1.16%

98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Green Dot shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Green Dot shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Regional Management and Regional Management both had 3 articles in the media. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Green Dot's score of -0.47 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Regional Management	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Green Dot	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Regional Management currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.62%. Green Dot has a consensus target price of $16.13, indicating a potential upside of 21.43%. Given Green Dot's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Green Dot is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Green Dot	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Regional Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Green Dot. Green Dot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.59	$44.41M	$4.93	8.40
Green Dot	$2.08B	0.36	-$98.87M	-$1.32	N/A

Regional Management has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Green Dot has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Regional Management beats Green Dot on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to PRA Group?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and PRA Group (NASDAQ:PRAA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

Regional Management has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PRA Group has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to PRA Group's net margin of -22.51%. PRA Group's return on equity of 13.19% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Regional Management	7.40%	13.16%	2.39%
PRA Group	-22.51%	13.19%	2.85%

In the previous week, Regional Management and Regional Management both had 3 articles in the media. PRA Group's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that PRA Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Regional Management	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PRA Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Regional Management currently has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.62%. PRA Group has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 46.15%. Given PRA Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PRA Group is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
PRA Group	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of PRA Group shares are held by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of PRA Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Regional Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PRA Group. PRA Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.59	$44.41M	$4.93	8.40
PRA Group	$1.20B	0.54	-$305.14M	-$7.16	N/A

Summary

Regional Management beats PRA Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to American Express?

American Express (NYSE:AXP) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

American Express currently has a consensus price target of $374.11, indicating a potential upside of 6.93%. Regional Management has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.62%. Given Regional Management's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Regional Management is more favorable than American Express.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
American Express	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.54
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

American Express has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

American Express has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Express, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
American Express	$72.23B	3.31	$10.83B	$16.03	21.83
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.59	$44.41M	$4.93	8.40

84.3% of American Express shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of American Express shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, American Express had 50 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for American Express and 3 mentions for Regional Management. American Express' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that American Express is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
American Express	34 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Regional Management	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

American Express pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. American Express pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional Management pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Express has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

American Express has a net margin of 15.13% compared to Regional Management's net margin of 7.40%. American Express' return on equity of 33.95% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
American Express	15.13%	33.95%	3.73%
Regional Management	7.40%	13.16%	2.39%

Summary

American Express beats Regional Management on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Capital One Financial?

Capital One Financial (NYSE:COF) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to Capital One Financial's net margin of 4.29%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat Capital One Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capital One Financial	4.29%	10.59%	1.78%
Regional Management	7.40%	13.16%	2.39%

Capital One Financial has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Capital One Financial currently has a consensus target price of $259.91, indicating a potential upside of 26.99%. Regional Management has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.62%. Given Capital One Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Capital One Financial is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capital One Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Regional Management	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Capital One Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Capital One Financial pays out 112.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regional Management pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

89.8% of Capital One Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Capital One Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capital One Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital One Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capital One Financial	$69.25B	1.84	$2.45B	$2.85	71.82
Regional Management	$645.60M	0.59	$44.41M	$4.93	8.40

In the previous week, Capital One Financial had 34 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Capital One Financial and 3 mentions for Regional Management. Capital One Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Regional Management's score of 0.53 indicating that Capital One Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Capital One Financial	27 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Regional Management	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Capital One Financial beats Regional Management on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Regional Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

RM vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Regional Management	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$381.57M	$11.16B	$14.33B	$23.36B
Dividend Yield	2.88%	5.53%	5.67%	4.15%
P/E Ratio	8.40	16.12	20.56	30.83
Price / Sales	0.59	1.79	45.04	20.57
Price / Cash	9.00	10.61	19.24	18.81
Price / Book	1.08	2.11	2.26	4.74
Net Income	$44.41M	$421.66M	$1.14B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-4.23%	-0.71%	0.32%	-0.18%
1 Month Performance	11.18%	3.36%	1.49%	0.89%
1 Year Performance	28.58%	23.42%	13.24%	17.03%

Regional Management Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
RM Regional Management	2.3668 of 5 stars	$41.63 +0.1%	$45.00 +8.1%	+28.7%	$383.39M	$645.60M	8.44	2,112
WRLD World Acceptance	1.02 of 5 stars	$195.34 +0.4%	N/A	+14.0%	$902.73M	$585.74M	26.47	2,907	Positive News Upcoming Earnings
GDOT Green Dot	3.0995 of 5 stars	$13.47 +0.1%	$16.13 +19.7%	+26.3%	$762.95M	$2.08B	N/A	1,150
PRAA PRA Group	4.1222 of 5 stars	$18.41 +2.1%	$25.00 +35.8%	+11.5%	$687.68M	$1.20B	N/A	2,615	News Coverage Positive News
AXP American Express	4.29 of 5 stars	$361.23 +0.8%	$374.15 +3.6%	+14.1%	$244.57B	$72.23B	22.53	76,800	Trending News Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:RM) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

RM vs. WRLD, GDOT, PRAA, AXP, and COF

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Green Dot?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to PRA Group?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to American Express?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Capital One Financial?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RM vs. The Competition

Regional Management Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

RM vs. WRLD, GDOT, PRAA, AXP, and COF

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

Do analysts prefer WRLD or RM?

Does the media prefer WRLD or RM?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in WRLD or RM?

Which has more volatility & risk, WRLD or RM?

Is WRLD or RM more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WRLD or RM?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Green Dot?

Is RM or GDOT more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in RM or GDOT?

Does the media prefer RM or GDOT?

Do analysts rate RM or GDOT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, RM or GDOT?

Which has more risk and volatility, RM or GDOT?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to PRA Group?

Which has more volatility and risk, RM or PRAA?

Is RM or PRAA more profitable?

Does the media prefer RM or PRAA?

Do analysts recommend RM or PRAA?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in RM or PRAA?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, RM or PRAA?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to American Express?

Do analysts recommend AXP or RM?

Which has more risk & volatility, AXP or RM?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AXP or RM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AXP or RM?

Does the media refer more to AXP or RM?

Is AXP or RM a better dividend stock?

Is AXP or RM more profitable?

Summary

How does Regional Management compare to Capital One Financial?

Is COF or RM more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, COF or RM?

Do analysts recommend COF or RM?

Is COF or RM a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in COF or RM?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, COF or RM?

Does the media favor COF or RM?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

RM vs. The Competition

Regional Management Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools