Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Is Waiting! Get MarketBeat All Access Today
Lock In $149
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Regional Management (RM) Competitors

Regional Management logo
$35.34 +0.38 (+1.10%)
As of 03:03 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RM vs. WRLD, GDOT, PRAA, AXP, and COF

Should you buy Regional Management stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Regional Management with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Regional Management include World Acceptance (WRLD), Green Dot (GDOT), PRA Group (PRAA), American Express (AXP), and Capital One Financial (COF). These companies are all part of the "consumer finance" industry.

How does Regional Management compare to World Acceptance?

World Acceptance (NASDAQ:WRLD) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

83.6% of World Acceptance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.6% of World Acceptance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to World Acceptance's net margin of 5.98%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat World Acceptance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
World Acceptance5.98% 9.17% 3.25%
Regional Management 7.40%13.16%2.39%

Regional Management has higher revenue and earnings than World Acceptance. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than World Acceptance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
World Acceptance$536.30M1.45$35.01M$7.3821.29
Regional Management$645.60M0.50$44.41M$4.937.17

World Acceptance has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional Management has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.32%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Regional Management is more favorable than World Acceptance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
World Acceptance
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Regional Management had 1 more articles in the media than World Acceptance. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Regional Management and 1 mentions for World Acceptance. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat World Acceptance's score of 1.32 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
World Acceptance
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Regional Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Regional Management beats World Acceptance on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Green Dot?

Green Dot (NYSE:GDOT) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both small-cap consumer finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

92.6% of Green Dot shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Green Dot shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to Green Dot's net margin of -3.25%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat Green Dot's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Green Dot-3.25% 7.56% 1.16%
Regional Management 7.40%13.16%2.39%

Green Dot currently has a consensus price target of $14.75, suggesting a potential upside of 14.52%. Regional Management has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.32%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Regional Management is more favorable than Green Dot.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Green Dot
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Green Dot has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Green Dot. Green Dot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Green Dot$2.08B0.35-$98.87M-$1.32N/A
Regional Management$645.60M0.50$44.41M$4.937.17

In the previous week, Green Dot and Green Dot both had 2 articles in the media. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat Green Dot's score of 0.00 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Green Dot
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Regional Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Regional Management beats Green Dot on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to PRA Group?

PRA Group (NASDAQ:PRAA) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Regional Management has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PRA Group. PRA Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regional Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PRA Group$1.20B0.47-$305.14M-$7.16N/A
Regional Management$645.60M0.50$44.41M$4.937.17

In the previous week, Regional Management had 1 more articles in the media than PRA Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Regional Management and 1 mentions for PRA Group. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat PRA Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PRA Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Regional Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

PRA Group has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

PRA Group presently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 70.13%. Regional Management has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.32%. Given PRA Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe PRA Group is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PRA Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

97.2% of PRA Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of PRA Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to PRA Group's net margin of -22.51%. PRA Group's return on equity of 13.19% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PRA Group-22.51% 13.19% 2.85%
Regional Management 7.40%13.16%2.39%

Summary

Regional Management beats PRA Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to American Express?

Regional Management (NYSE:RM) and American Express (NYSE:AXP) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. American Express pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Regional Management pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. American Express pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Express has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

American Express has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Express, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regional Management$645.60M0.50$44.41M$4.937.17
American Express$72.23B2.93$10.83B$16.0319.33

Regional Management has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, American Express has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Regional Management currently has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.32%. American Express has a consensus price target of $357.47, indicating a potential upside of 15.39%. Given Regional Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Regional Management is more favorable than American Express.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
American Express
1 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.39

American Express has a net margin of 15.13% compared to Regional Management's net margin of 7.40%. American Express' return on equity of 33.95% beat Regional Management's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regional Management7.40% 13.16% 2.39%
American Express 15.13%33.95%3.73%

98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of American Express shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of American Express shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, American Express had 55 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for American Express and 2 mentions for Regional Management. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat American Express' score of 1.09 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regional Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
American Express
39 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
12 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

American Express beats Regional Management on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Regional Management compare to Capital One Financial?

Capital One Financial (NYSE:COF) and Regional Management (NYSE:RM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Capital One Financial currently has a consensus price target of $258.75, indicating a potential upside of 39.89%. Regional Management has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.32%. Given Capital One Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Capital One Financial is more favorable than Regional Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital One Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.77
Regional Management
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

89.8% of Capital One Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Capital One Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.9% of Regional Management shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital One Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Regional Management pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Capital One Financial pays out 112.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regional Management pays out 24.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regional Management is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Regional Management has a net margin of 7.40% compared to Capital One Financial's net margin of 4.29%. Regional Management's return on equity of 13.16% beat Capital One Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital One Financial4.29% 10.59% 1.78%
Regional Management 7.40%13.16%2.39%

Capital One Financial has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Regional Management has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Capital One Financial had 34 more articles in the media than Regional Management. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Capital One Financial and 2 mentions for Regional Management. Regional Management's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat Capital One Financial's score of 1.06 indicating that Regional Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital One Financial
25 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Regional Management
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Capital One Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Regional Management. Regional Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital One Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital One Financial$69.25B1.66$2.45B$2.8564.90
Regional Management$645.60M0.50$44.41M$4.937.17

Summary

Capital One Financial and Regional Management tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Regional Management News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RM vs. The Competition

MetricRegional ManagementFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$325.34M$10.02B$13.55B$22.99B
Dividend Yield3.53%5.52%5.88%4.13%
P/E Ratio7.1714.2924.0030.06
Price / Sales0.501.58160.7090.72
Price / Cash7.348.1819.8524.44
Price / Book0.871.652.144.69
Net Income$44.41M$421.68M$1.13B$1.07B
7 Day Performance1.85%0.62%0.10%0.01%
1 Month Performance-7.54%-2.16%-0.03%0.10%
1 Year Performance30.19%17.53%11.82%27.86%

Regional Management Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RM
Regional Management
4.6087 of 5 stars
$35.34
+1.1%
$45.00
+27.3%
+23.6%$325.34M$645.60M7.172,112
WRLD
World Acceptance
1.4038 of 5 stars
$150.29
+0.3%
N/A+5.0%$739.94M$585.74M20.362,838
GDOT
Green Dot
2.6308 of 5 stars
$12.84
+1.6%
$14.75
+14.9%
+37.1%$702.37M$2.08BN/A1,150
PRAA
PRA Group
2.8236 of 5 stars
$14.72
+0.1%
$25.00
+69.8%
-2.0%$560.67M$1.20BN/A2,615
AXP
American Express
4.2752 of 5 stars
$312.94
+1.1%
$357.47
+14.2%
+4.8%$211.26B$72.23B19.5276,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:RM) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners