Marcus (MCS) Competitors

Airbnb has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marcus has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Airbnb had 52 more articles in the media than Marcus. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Airbnb and 5 mentions for Marcus. Airbnb's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Marcus' score of 0.21 indicating that Airbnb is being referred to more favorably in the media.

80.8% of Airbnb shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Marcus shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.2% of Airbnb shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Marcus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Airbnb has a net margin of 19.90% compared to Marcus' net margin of 1.85%. Airbnb's return on equity of 31.24% beat Marcus' return on equity.

Airbnb presently has a consensus price target of $157.76, indicating a potential upside of 18.14%. Marcus has a consensus price target of $23.33, indicating a potential upside of 14.80%. Given Airbnb's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Airbnb is more favorable than Marcus.

Airbnb has higher revenue and earnings than Marcus. Airbnb is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marcus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marcus pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Royal Caribbean Cruises pays an annual dividend of $6.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Marcus pays out 74.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Royal Caribbean Cruises pays out 36.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marcus has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Royal Caribbean Cruises has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Royal Caribbean Cruises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Royal Caribbean Cruises has a net margin of 24.36% compared to Marcus' net margin of 1.85%. Royal Caribbean Cruises' return on equity of 45.25% beat Marcus' return on equity.

81.6% of Marcus shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Royal Caribbean Cruises shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Marcus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Royal Caribbean Cruises shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Royal Caribbean Cruises has higher revenue and earnings than Marcus. Royal Caribbean Cruises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marcus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Royal Caribbean Cruises had 12 more articles in the media than Marcus. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Royal Caribbean Cruises and 5 mentions for Marcus. Royal Caribbean Cruises' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Marcus' score of 0.21 indicating that Royal Caribbean Cruises is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Marcus currently has a consensus target price of $23.33, indicating a potential upside of 14.80%. Royal Caribbean Cruises has a consensus target price of $344.79, indicating a potential upside of 22.76%. Given Royal Caribbean Cruises' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Royal Caribbean Cruises is more favorable than Marcus.

Marcus has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Caribbean Cruises has a beta of 1.77, meaning that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Carnival has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marcus has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Carnival pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Marcus pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Carnival pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marcus pays out 74.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marcus has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Carnival is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

67.2% of Carnival shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Marcus shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Carnival shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Marcus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Carnival has a net margin of 11.48% compared to Marcus' net margin of 1.85%. Carnival's return on equity of 26.92% beat Marcus' return on equity.

Carnival currently has a consensus price target of $34.80, indicating a potential upside of 26.88%. Marcus has a consensus price target of $23.33, indicating a potential upside of 14.80%. Given Carnival's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Carnival is more favorable than Marcus.

Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than Marcus. Carnival is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marcus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Carnival had 24 more articles in the media than Marcus. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Carnival and 5 mentions for Marcus. Carnival's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Marcus' score of 0.21 indicating that Carnival is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Marcus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hyatt Hotels. Hyatt Hotels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marcus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Hyatt Hotels had 23 more articles in the media than Marcus. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Hyatt Hotels and 5 mentions for Marcus. Hyatt Hotels' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Marcus' score of 0.21 indicating that Hyatt Hotels is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hyatt Hotels has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marcus has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Hyatt Hotels pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Marcus pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Hyatt Hotels pays out -171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marcus pays out 74.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hyatt Hotels has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Marcus has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Marcus is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Marcus has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Hyatt Hotels' net margin of -0.48%. Hyatt Hotels' return on equity of 6.01% beat Marcus' return on equity.

73.5% of Hyatt Hotels shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Marcus shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.6% of Hyatt Hotels shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.5% of Marcus shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hyatt Hotels presently has a consensus target price of $192.40, indicating a potential downside of 0.27%. Marcus has a consensus target price of $23.33, indicating a potential upside of 14.80%. Given Marcus' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marcus is more favorable than Hyatt Hotels.