Sprott (SII) Competitors

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus target price of $236.08, indicating a potential upside of 50.93%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 118.86%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 12 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sprott has a net margin of 21.99% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Sprott has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 118.86%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $25.25, indicating a potential upside of 52.96%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Majestic Silver pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 6 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 0 mentions for Sprott. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 10 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Alamos Gold and 0 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.12 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Sprott presently has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 118.86%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of $53.00, suggesting a potential upside of 70.66%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Sprott has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sprott has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott currently has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 118.86%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.97%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 0 mentions for Sprott. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.