Sprott (SII) Competitors

Sprott has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 17 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 16 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.78 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 99.37%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $226.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.26%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. First Majestic Silver pays out 9.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

First Majestic Silver currently has a consensus price target of $23.83, suggesting a potential upside of 35.00%. Sprott has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 99.37%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 7 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 16 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat First Majestic Silver's score of 0.78 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sprott has a net margin of 21.99% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 51.79%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 99.37%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Alamos Gold and 16 mentions for Sprott. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Sprott's score of 0.98 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Alamos Gold pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 99.37%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 45.30%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sprott has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sprott had 7 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Sprott and 9 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.74 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the media.