Sprott (SII) Competitors

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sprott has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Sprott currently has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.02%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus target price of $226.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.87%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 37 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 2 mentions for Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Sprott's score of 0.59 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 2 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 2 mentions for Sprott. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Sprott's score of 0.59 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.02%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $23.83, suggesting a potential upside of 12.24%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Sprott has a net margin of 26.36% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Majestic Silver pays out 8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Alamos Gold pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.68%. Sprott has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.02%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold and Alamos Gold both had 2 articles in the media. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Sprott's score of 0.59 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 2 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.45 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Sprott has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Sprott presently has a consensus target price of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.02%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.40%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.