Sprott (SII) Competitors

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sprott currently has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 87.47%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $236.08, suggesting a potential upside of 44.49%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 14 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

Sprott has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 5 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 0 mentions for Sprott. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Majestic Silver pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sprott has a net margin of 21.99% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 87.47%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $25.25, indicating a potential upside of 48.75%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 3 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Alamos Gold and 0 mentions for Sprott. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus target price of $50.67, suggesting a potential upside of 42.94%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 87.47%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortuna Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott currently has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 87.47%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.87%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Sprott has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.