Sprott (SII) Competitors

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 27 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.92 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus price target of $226.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.17%. Sprott has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 78.56%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

First Majestic Silver currently has a consensus price target of $23.83, suggesting a potential upside of 27.78%. Sprott has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.56%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. First Majestic Silver pays out 8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sprott has a net margin of 26.36% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 8 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 0 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat First Majestic Silver's score of 1.21 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 5 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Alamos Gold and 0 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Alamos Gold's score of 1.02 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Alamos Gold pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 34.69%. Sprott has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.56%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.79% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Sprott has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sprott currently has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.56%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of $273.40, suggesting a potential upside of 4.81%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Sprott is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Franco-Nevada has raised its dividend for 18 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 11 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 0 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 1.14 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the media.