Sprott (SII) Competitors

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 33 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 2 mentions for Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus target price of $238.18, suggesting a potential upside of 32.04%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.42%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

Sprott has a net margin of 21.99% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 21 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 2 mentions for Sprott. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. First Majestic Silver pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus target price of $25.25, suggesting a potential upside of 23.60%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.42%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 1 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Alamos Gold and 2 mentions for Sprott. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.33 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of $50.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.76%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 78.42%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Sprott has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Franco-Nevada has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 17 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 2 mentions for Sprott. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Franco-Nevada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott currently has a consensus target price of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 78.42%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of $257.75, indicating a potential upside of 14.36%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.