Sprott (SII) Competitors

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus target price of $233.62, indicating a potential upside of 70.62%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 119.87%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 22 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 0 mentions for Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sprott has a net margin of 21.99% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus target price of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 49.28%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 119.87%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. First Majestic Silver pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 17 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 0 mentions for Sprott. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 48.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.12%. Sprott has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 119.87%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 8 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Alamos Gold and 0 mentions for Sprott. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 11 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 0 mentions for Sprott. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Sprott's score of 0.00 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to Sprott's net margin of 21.99%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 71.25%. Sprott has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 119.87%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sprott is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.