Sprott (SII) Competitors

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

28.3% of Sprott shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity.

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 98.32%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $227.15, indicating a potential upside of 23.54%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Sprott has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 9 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 2 mentions for Sprott. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Sprott's score of -0.18 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sprott has a net margin of 26.36% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Sprott has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sprott presently has a consensus price target of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 98.32%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $23.83, suggesting a potential upside of 34.96%. Given Sprott's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. First Majestic Silver pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Majestic Silver pays out 8.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. First Majestic Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 2 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 2 mentions for Sprott. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Sprott's score of -0.18 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 9 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Alamos Gold and 2 mentions for Sprott. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Sprott's score of -0.18 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Alamos Gold pays out 5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 46.26%. Sprott has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 98.32%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Centerra Gold has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Centerra Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sprott. Centerra Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprott, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sprott pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Centerra Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sprott pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Centerra Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sprott has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Sprott is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

28.3% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of Centerra Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.3% of Sprott shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Centerra Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Centerra Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Sprott. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Centerra Gold and 2 mentions for Sprott. Centerra Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Sprott's score of -0.18 indicating that Centerra Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Sprott currently has a consensus target price of $230.00, indicating a potential upside of 98.32%. Centerra Gold has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.15%. Given Sprott's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Centerra Gold.

Centerra Gold has a net margin of 36.92% compared to Sprott's net margin of 26.36%. Sprott's return on equity of 28.40% beat Centerra Gold's return on equity.