Brigham Minerals Competitors

CNX Resources (NYSE:CNX) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.0% of CNX Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of CNX Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares CNX Resources and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

CNX Resources has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CNX Resources and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Brigham Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CNX Resources. Brigham Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNX Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CNX Resources and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

CNX Resources currently has a consensus price target of $14.6923, suggesting a potential upside of 6.31%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given CNX Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CNX Resources is more favorable than Brigham Minerals.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats CNX Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.3% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Magnolia Oil & Gas and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 2.72, suggesting that its stock price is 172% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Magnolia Oil & Gas and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Brigham Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Magnolia Oil & Gas and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $9.2083, suggesting a potential downside of 20.96%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Magnolia Oil & Gas on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Southwestern Energy (NYSE:SWN) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.2% of Southwestern Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Southwestern Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Southwestern Energy and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Southwestern Energy has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Southwestern Energy and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Southwestern Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Southwestern Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Southwestern Energy and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Southwestern Energy currently has a consensus price target of $3.6967, suggesting a potential downside of 10.28%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Southwestern Energy.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Southwestern Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Antero Resources (NYSE:AR) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.1% of Antero Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Antero Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Antero Resources and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Antero Resources has a beta of 4.57, suggesting that its stock price is 357% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Antero Resources and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Brigham Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Antero Resources. Antero Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Antero Resources and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Antero Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.0750, suggesting a potential downside of 23.01%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Antero Resources.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Antero Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Matador Resources and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Brigham Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Matador Resources pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brigham Minerals pays out 182.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brigham Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Brigham Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Matador Resources and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Matador Resources currently has a consensus price target of $14.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 37.66%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Risk & Volatility

Matador Resources has a beta of 4.8, meaning that its share price is 380% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, meaning that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.7% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Matador Resources and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Matador Resources beats Brigham Minerals on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) and Murphy Oil (NYSE:MUR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Brigham Minerals and Murphy Oil's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Murphy Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Murphy Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Brigham Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Brigham Minerals pays out 182.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murphy Oil pays out 57.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brigham Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Brigham Minerals and Murphy Oil, as provided by MarketBeat.

Brigham Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Murphy Oil has a consensus price target of $14.8214, suggesting a potential downside of 9.74%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Volatility & Risk

Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Murphy Oil has a beta of 3.33, suggesting that its stock price is 233% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.6% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Brigham Minerals and Murphy Oil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Murphy Oil on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.