NYSE:MNRL

Brigham Minerals Competitors

$15.27
+0.09 (+0.59 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.07
Now: $15.27
$15.36
50-Day Range
$13.80
MA: $15.32
$16.83
52-Week Range
$8.05
Now: $15.27
$17.05
Volume294,199 shs
Average Volume535,612 shs
Market Capitalization$866.21 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield6.85%
Beta2.45

Competitors

Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) Vs. CNX, MGY, SWN, AR, MTDR, and MUR

Should you be buying MNRL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Brigham Minerals, including CNX Resources (CNX), Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY), Southwestern Energy (SWN), Antero Resources (AR), Matador Resources (MTDR), and Murphy Oil (MUR).

CNX Resources (NYSE:CNX) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.0% of CNX Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of CNX Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares CNX Resources and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CNX Resources-83.40%1.94%1.05%
Brigham Minerals-3.67%1.70%1.09%

Volatility and Risk

CNX Resources has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its share price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CNX Resources and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CNX Resources$1.92 billion1.58$-80,730,000.00$0.2653.15
Brigham Minerals$101.51 million8.53$21.64 million$0.5726.79

Brigham Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CNX Resources. Brigham Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNX Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CNX Resources and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CNX Resources06802.57
Brigham Minerals00813.11

CNX Resources currently has a consensus price target of $14.6923, suggesting a potential upside of 6.31%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given CNX Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CNX Resources is more favorable than Brigham Minerals.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats CNX Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.3% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Magnolia Oil & Gas and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas-199.68%-1.06%-0.71%
Brigham Minerals-3.67%1.70%1.09%

Risk & Volatility

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 2.72, suggesting that its stock price is 172% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Magnolia Oil & Gas and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas$936.14 million3.03$50.20 million$0.3038.83
Brigham Minerals$101.51 million8.53$21.64 million$0.5726.79

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Brigham Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Magnolia Oil & Gas and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas06702.54
Brigham Minerals00813.11

Magnolia Oil & Gas currently has a consensus price target of $9.2083, suggesting a potential downside of 20.96%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Magnolia Oil & Gas.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Magnolia Oil & Gas on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Southwestern Energy (NYSE:SWN) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.2% of Southwestern Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Southwestern Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Southwestern Energy and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Southwestern Energy-127.97%13.06%3.88%
Brigham Minerals-3.67%1.70%1.09%

Risk & Volatility

Southwestern Energy has a beta of 1.53, suggesting that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Southwestern Energy and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Southwestern Energy$3.04 billion0.91$891 million$0.616.75
Brigham Minerals$101.51 million8.53$21.64 million$0.5726.79

Southwestern Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Southwestern Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Southwestern Energy and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Southwestern Energy211502.17
Brigham Minerals00813.11

Southwestern Energy currently has a consensus price target of $3.6967, suggesting a potential downside of 10.28%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Southwestern Energy.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Southwestern Energy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Antero Resources (NYSE:AR) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.1% of Antero Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Antero Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Antero Resources and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Antero Resources-58.04%-2.17%-0.99%
Brigham Minerals-3.67%1.70%1.09%

Risk & Volatility

Antero Resources has a beta of 4.57, suggesting that its stock price is 357% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Antero Resources and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Antero Resources$4.41 billion0.63$-340,130,000.00($0.14)-65.64
Brigham Minerals$101.51 million8.53$21.64 million$0.5726.79

Brigham Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Antero Resources. Antero Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Antero Resources and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Antero Resources15702.46
Brigham Minerals00813.11

Antero Resources currently has a consensus price target of $7.0750, suggesting a potential downside of 23.01%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Antero Resources.

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Antero Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) and Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Matador Resources and Brigham Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Matador Resources$983.67 million2.78$87.78 million$1.2019.55
Brigham Minerals$101.51 million8.53$21.64 million$0.5726.79

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Matador Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Brigham Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Matador Resources pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brigham Minerals pays out 182.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brigham Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Brigham Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Matador Resources and Brigham Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Matador Resources041102.73
Brigham Minerals00813.11

Matador Resources currently has a consensus price target of $14.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 37.66%. Brigham Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Risk & Volatility

Matador Resources has a beta of 4.8, meaning that its share price is 380% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, meaning that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.7% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Matador Resources and Brigham Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Matador Resources-51.85%4.13%1.92%
Brigham Minerals-3.67%1.70%1.09%

Summary

Matador Resources beats Brigham Minerals on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Brigham Minerals (NYSE:MNRL) and Murphy Oil (NYSE:MUR) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Brigham Minerals and Murphy Oil's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brigham Minerals$101.51 million8.53$21.64 million$0.5726.79
Murphy Oil$2.83 billion0.89$1.15 billion$0.8718.87

Murphy Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Brigham Minerals. Murphy Oil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brigham Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Brigham Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Murphy Oil pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Brigham Minerals pays out 182.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Murphy Oil pays out 57.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brigham Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Murphy Oil has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Brigham Minerals and Murphy Oil, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Brigham Minerals00813.11
Murphy Oil28502.20

Brigham Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $15.1111, suggesting a potential downside of 1.04%. Murphy Oil has a consensus price target of $14.8214, suggesting a potential downside of 9.74%. Given Brigham Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Brigham Minerals is more favorable than Murphy Oil.

Volatility & Risk

Brigham Minerals has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Murphy Oil has a beta of 3.33, suggesting that its stock price is 233% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.6% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.6% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Brigham Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.6% of Murphy Oil shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Brigham Minerals and Murphy Oil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Brigham Minerals-3.67%1.70%1.09%
Murphy Oil-46.10%-3.06%-1.40%

Summary

Brigham Minerals beats Murphy Oil on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Brigham Minerals Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CNX Resources logo
CNX
CNX Resources
1.9$13.82+1.7%$3.04 billion$1.92 billion-2.75
Magnolia Oil & Gas logo
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas
1.2$11.65+0.6%$2.84 billion$936.14 million-1.59Analyst Report
News Coverage
Southwestern Energy logo
SWN
Southwestern Energy
1.5$4.12+4.4%$2.78 billion$3.04 billion-0.77News Coverage
Gap Down
Antero Resources logo
AR
Antero Resources
1.6$9.19+4.4%$2.77 billion$4.41 billion-1.41Gap Down
Matador Resources logo
MTDR
Matador Resources
2.3$23.46+3.7%$2.74 billion$983.67 million-5.68Gap Down
Murphy Oil logo
MUR
Murphy Oil
1.5$16.42+1.4%$2.52 billion$2.83 billion-2.41Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Viper Energy Partners logo
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners
1.0$15.09+3.2%$2.35 billion$298.28 million-6.29Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Range Resources logo
RRC
Range Resources
1.5$9.00+7.8%$2.34 billion$2.83 billion-0.89Gap Down
Crescent Point Energy logo
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
1.8$3.94+0.3%$2.29 billion$2.51 billion-0.85
SM Energy logo
SM
SM Energy
1.4$17.26+0.4%$1.98 billion$1.59 billion-2.79Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Black Stone Minerals logo
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
1.7$9.20+3.8%$1.91 billion$487.82 million17.36Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Callon Petroleum logo
CPE
Callon Petroleum
1.9$35.21+4.8%$1.63 billion$671.57 million-0.68Gap Down
Enerplus logo
ERF
Enerplus
2.2$5.47+4.2%$1.40 billion$945.62 million-1.44Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Up
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.6$5.24+0.4%$1.22 billion$768.69 million-10.08
Centennial Resource Development logo
CDEV
Centennial Resource Development
1.0$4.24+1.2%$1.18 billion$944.33 million-1.99
Kosmos Energy logo
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.2$2.78+7.6%$1.13 billion$1.51 billion-2.48Gap Down
Vermilion Energy logo
VET
Vermilion Energy
1.6$6.95+0.1%$1.10 billion$1.27 billion-1.00News Coverage
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
1.0$4.08+0.0%$989.67 million$1.21 billion34.00
GeoPark logo
GPRK
GeoPark
1.8$15.79+6.0%$963.66 million$628.91 million-8.40Gap Down
Talos Energy logo
TALO
Talos Energy
1.8$11.73+0.3%$958.42 million$927.62 million-69.00
Par Pacific logo
PARR
Par Pacific
1.3$14.78+3.4%$798.25 million$5.40 billion-3.26Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Tellurian logo
TELL
Tellurian
1.4$2.06+0.5%$796.37 million$28.77 million-2.10
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.3$33.25+5.0%$692.90 million$313.22 million17.05Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Kimbell Royalty Partners logo
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners
1.8$10.00+1.4%$596.98 million$108.22 million-1.83
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
1.2$7.25+2.1%$566.15 million$191.26 million-29.00Insider Selling
News Coverage
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.4$3.45+3.5%$490.95 million$534.90 million3.38
Dorchester Minerals logo
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
1.0$13.96+1.1%$484.13 million$78.80 million17.67
Berry logo
BRY
Berry
1.4$5.58+0.7%$449.03 million$559.41 million-2.15
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$33.99+5.1%$438.47 million$837.28 million-0.50Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$22.80+1.9%$411.04 million$848.30 million18.54Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.3$4.58+1.1%$394.37 million$68.46 million45.80Analyst Revision
News Coverage
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.2$2.63+5.7%$333.05 million$1.04 billion-2.25Gap Up
Torchlight Energy Resources logo
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.3N/AN/A$271.74 million$750,000.00-9.35
Vista Oil & Gas logo
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.6$2.77+1.4%$241.83 million$415.98 million-1.81Analyst Upgrade
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$12.76+2.3%$194.81 million$471.22 million-1.13Gap Down
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$11.86+0.0%$192.93 millionN/A-1.09
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$3.72+1.9%$134.42 million$266.85 million-0.25News Coverage
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
1.3$2.25+1.8%$129.74 million$84.52 million-3.00
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.47+2.0%$106.64 million$278.93 million-1.29
AMPY
Amplify Energy
0.9$2.56+4.3%$96.40 million$275.58 million-0.21
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$47.85+3.2%$95.41 million$104.82 million0.00
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$7.78+2.4%$94.48 million$288.63 million-0.30News Coverage
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.81+0.3%$91.39 million$26.69 million63.51
PermRock Royalty Trust logo
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
1.3$5.43+1.1%$66.02 million$10.44 million0.00
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$5.44+3.3%$62.56 million$12.99 million5.85Dividend Increase
High Trading Volume
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
0.9$3.46+1.4%$58.82 million$9.21 million6.41
PHX Minerals logo
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.7$2.62+8.8%$58.78 million$28.97 million-1.90Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
0.8$1.43+0.0%$47.13 million$44.96 million6.49
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$2.97+1.7%$24.96 million$129.15 million0.00
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$4.73+15.6%$20.36 million$452.66 million-0.02Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.