ProSight Global Competitors

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and Palomar (NASDAQ:PLMR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and Palomar's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.7% of Palomar shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Palomar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for ProSight Global and Palomar, as provided by MarketBeat.

ProSight Global presently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. Palomar has a consensus price target of $96.8333, indicating a potential upside of 32.63%. Given Palomar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Palomar is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and Palomar's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ProSight Global has higher revenue and earnings than Palomar. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palomar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Palomar has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Palomar beats ProSight Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and Horace Mann Educators (NYSE:HMN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and Horace Mann Educators' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Horace Mann Educators shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and Horace Mann Educators, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. Horace Mann Educators has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.02%. Given Horace Mann Educators' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Horace Mann Educators is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and Horace Mann Educators' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Horace Mann Educators has higher revenue and earnings than ProSight Global. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Horace Mann Educators, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Horace Mann Educators has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Horace Mann Educators beats ProSight Global on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and ProAssurance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and ProAssurance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.16%. Given ProSight Global's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ProSight Global is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and ProAssurance's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ProSight Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProSight Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

ProSight Global beats ProAssurance on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and James River Group (NASDAQ:JRVR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and James River Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of James River Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of James River Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and James River Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. James River Group has a consensus price target of $159.00, indicating a potential upside of 239.67%. Given James River Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James River Group is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and James River Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ProSight Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James River Group. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James River Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, James River Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

James River Group beats ProSight Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and AMERISAFE (NASDAQ:AMSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and AMERISAFE's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AMERISAFE has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ProSight Global. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMERISAFE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and AMERISAFE, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. AMERISAFE has a consensus price target of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.57%. Given AMERISAFE's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AMERISAFE is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and AMERISAFE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of AMERISAFE shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of AMERISAFE shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AMERISAFE beats ProSight Global on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Safety Insurance Group (NASDAQ:SAFT) and ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Safety Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProSight Global.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

ProSight Global has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. Given ProSight Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ProSight Global is more favorable than Safety Insurance Group.

Profitability

This table compares Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

79.8% of Safety Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of ProSight Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Safety Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Safety Insurance Group beats ProSight Global on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.