NYSE:PROS

ProSight Global Competitors

$12.66
-0.01 (-0.08 %)
(As of 04/21/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$12.65
Now: $12.66
$12.69
50-Day Range
$12.50
MA: $12.62
$12.75
52-Week Range
$7.26
Now: $12.66
$14.25
Volume23,907 shs
Average Volume94,686 shs
Market Capitalization$552.70 million
P/E Ratio13.61
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.45

Competitors

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) Vs. PLMR, HMN, PRA, JRVR, AMSF, and SAFT

Should you be buying PROS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "fire, marine, & casualty insurance" are considered alternatives and competitors to ProSight Global, including Palomar (PLMR), Horace Mann Educators (HMN), ProAssurance (PRA), James River Group (JRVR), AMERISAFE (AMSF), and Safety Insurance Group (SAFT).

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and Palomar (NASDAQ:PLMR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and Palomar's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ProSight Global4.78%10.17%1.91%
Palomar11.97%6.95%3.98%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.7% of Palomar shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Palomar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for ProSight Global and Palomar, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ProSight Global01002.00
Palomar01402.80

ProSight Global presently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. Palomar has a consensus price target of $96.8333, indicating a potential upside of 32.63%. Given Palomar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Palomar is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and Palomar's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11
Palomar$113.30 million16.49$10.62 million$1.7342.20

ProSight Global has higher revenue and earnings than Palomar. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palomar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Palomar has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Palomar beats ProSight Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and Horace Mann Educators (NYSE:HMN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and Horace Mann Educators' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ProSight Global4.78%10.17%1.91%
Horace Mann Educators9.18%7.96%1.02%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Horace Mann Educators shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and Horace Mann Educators, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ProSight Global01002.00
Horace Mann Educators02002.00

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. Horace Mann Educators has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.02%. Given Horace Mann Educators' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Horace Mann Educators is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and Horace Mann Educators' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11
Horace Mann Educators$1.43 billion1.21$184.44 million$2.2018.94

Horace Mann Educators has higher revenue and earnings than ProSight Global. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Horace Mann Educators, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Horace Mann Educators has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Horace Mann Educators beats ProSight Global on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and ProAssurance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ProSight Global4.78%10.17%1.91%
ProAssurance-27.87%-6.92%-2.09%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and ProAssurance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ProSight Global01002.00
ProAssurance13102.00

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.16%. Given ProSight Global's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ProSight Global is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and ProAssurance's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11
ProAssurance$999.83 million1.46$1 million($0.81)-33.47

ProSight Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProSight Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

ProSight Global beats ProAssurance on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and James River Group (NASDAQ:JRVR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and James River Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ProSight Global4.78%10.17%1.91%
James River Group6.37%9.43%1.47%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of James River Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.5% of James River Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and James River Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ProSight Global01002.00
James River Group02202.50

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. James River Group has a consensus price target of $159.00, indicating a potential upside of 239.67%. Given James River Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe James River Group is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and James River Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11
James River Group$907.13 million1.59$38.34 million$1.4033.44

ProSight Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than James River Group. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James River Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, James River Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

James River Group beats ProSight Global on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) and AMERISAFE (NASDAQ:AMSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and AMERISAFE's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11
AMERISAFE$370.37 million3.40$92.69 million$4.6014.16

AMERISAFE has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ProSight Global. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMERISAFE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for ProSight Global and AMERISAFE, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ProSight Global01002.00
AMERISAFE01102.50

ProSight Global currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. AMERISAFE has a consensus price target of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.57%. Given AMERISAFE's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AMERISAFE is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and AMERISAFE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ProSight Global4.78%10.17%1.91%
AMERISAFE26.84%20.22%5.99%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.4% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of AMERISAFE shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of AMERISAFE shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

AMERISAFE beats ProSight Global on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Safety Insurance Group (NASDAQ:SAFT) and ProSight Global (NYSE:PROS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safety Insurance Group$877.75 million1.45$99.60 millionN/AN/A
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11

Safety Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProSight Global.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Safety Insurance Group0000N/A
ProSight Global01002.00

ProSight Global has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.69%. Given ProSight Global's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ProSight Global is more favorable than Safety Insurance Group.

Profitability

This table compares Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Safety Insurance Group13.57%14.19%5.71%
ProSight Global4.78%10.17%1.91%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

79.8% of Safety Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of ProSight Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Safety Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProSight Global has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Safety Insurance Group beats ProSight Global on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


ProSight Global Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Palomar logo
PLMR
Palomar
1.9$73.01-4.4%$1.87 billion$113.30 million92.42
Horace Mann Educators logo
HMN
Horace Mann Educators
1.3$41.66-1.2%$1.73 billion$1.43 billion14.77Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
ProAssurance logo
PRA
ProAssurance
1.4$27.11-0.7%$1.46 billion$999.83 million-5.86Analyst Revision
James River Group logo
JRVR
James River Group
2.2$46.81-0.0%$1.44 billion$907.13 million31.84
AMERISAFE logo
AMSF
AMERISAFE
2.0$65.12-0.8%$1.26 billion$370.37 million13.65
Safety Insurance Group logo
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
1.3$84.69-0.9%$1.26 billion$877.75 million11.40News Coverage
Employers logo
EIG
Employers
1.6$40.57-0.9%$1.16 billion$784.80 million14.14Upcoming Earnings
State Auto Financial logo
STFC
State Auto Financial
1.4$19.70-0.2%$867.63 million$1.41 billion-21.89Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
BlackRock TCP Capital logo
TCPC
BlackRock TCP Capital
1.3$14.51-0.1%$838.20 million$195.17 million35.39
United Fire Group logo
UFCS
United Fire Group
1.2$32.98-1.6%$828.46 million$1.20 billion-6.49Analyst Downgrade
WTRE
Watford
0.8$34.84-0.0%$692.86 million$687.36 million-7.43
HCI Group logo
HCI
HCI Group
2.4$74.53-0.8%$642.75 million$242.47 million20.31
Donegal Group logo
DGICA
Donegal Group
1.8$16.30-0.5%$493.50 million$812.45 million8.91Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Increase
Tiptree logo
TIPT
Tiptree
0.7$14.22-21.2%$462.69 million$772.73 million-12.05High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Donegal Group logo
DGICB
Donegal Group
1.3$14.98-1.3%$453.68 million$812.45 million9.03Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Increase
Gap Down
Universal Insurance logo
UVE
Universal Insurance
2.4$13.96-2.4%$435.64 million$939.35 million-33.24Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
NI logo
NODK
NI
0.7$19.28-0.1%$411.98 million$270.78 million11.83Decrease in Short Interest
Global Indemnity Group logo
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group
1.0$27.85-0.1%$401.07 million$604.47 million63.29
Protective Insurance logo
PTVCB
Protective Insurance
0.9$22.94-0.0%$324.74 million$495.60 million-84.96
Greenlight Capital Re logo
GLRE
Greenlight Capital Re
0.7$9.18-2.3%$323.04 million$538.15 million-4.88News Coverage
Heritage Insurance logo
HRTG
Heritage Insurance
2.8$10.59-2.6%$296.15 million$511.30 million15.81
Maiden logo
MHLD
Maiden
0.6$3.37-5.6%$293.66 million$576.14 million25.93
United Insurance logo
UIHC
United Insurance
1.8$6.03-0.8%$257.66 million$825.12 million-3.63Analyst Report
Kingsway Financial Services logo
KFS
Kingsway Financial Services
0.8$4.51-0.7%$102.43 million$59.95 million0.00
Kingstone Companies logo
KINS
Kingstone Companies
1.4$8.11-0.2%$86.79 million$145.56 million-135.14Analyst Revision
FedNat logo
FNHC
FedNat
2.0$4.52-4.4%$77.00 million$414.96 million-1.31
ICCH
ICC
0.9$15.30-8.3%$50.44 million$59.53 million16.45News Coverage
Gap Up
Conifer logo
CNFR
Conifer
0.8$3.64-1.1%$35.24 million$96 million-6.17News Coverage
Unico American logo
UNAM
Unico American
0.7$4.59-2.8%$25.01 million$31.37 million-1.12
OXBR
Oxbridge Re
0.4$1.99-5.5%$11.40 million$980,000.00-66.33Analyst Upgrade
This page was last updated on 4/21/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.