Skip to main content
NASDAQ:HUSN

Hudson Capital Competitors

$2.40
-0.18 (-6.98 %)
(As of 05/14/2021 03:45 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.40
$2.54
50-Day Range
$2.23
$3.14
52-Week Range
$1.70
$9.80
Volume1,217 shs
Average Volume274,486 shs
Market Capitalization$15.37 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.47

Competitors

Hudson Capital (NASDAQ:HUSN) Vs. GIB, BAH, G, FCN, EXPO, and ICFI

Should you be buying HUSN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "management consulting services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Hudson Capital, including CGI (GIB), Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), Genpact (G), FTI Consulting (FCN), Exponent (EXPO), and ICF International (ICFI).

Hudson Capital (NASDAQ:HUSN) and CGI (NYSE:GIB) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Hudson Capital and CGI's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hudson CapitalN/AN/AN/A
CGI9.20%18.58%8.79%

Volatility and Risk

Hudson Capital has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CGI has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

40.2% of Hudson Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.3% of CGI shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of CGI shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hudson Capital and CGI's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudson Capital$1.37 million11.22$-62,000,000.00N/AN/A
CGI$9.04 billion2.49$831.69 million$3.6324.42

CGI has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Capital.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Hudson Capital and CGI, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hudson Capital0000N/A
CGI041002.71

CGI has a consensus price target of $114.8889, suggesting a potential upside of 29.61%. Given CGI's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CGI is more favorable than Hudson Capital.

Summary

CGI beats Hudson Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hudson Capital (NASDAQ:HUSN) and Booz Allen Hamilton (NYSE:BAH) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Hudson Capital and Booz Allen Hamilton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hudson CapitalN/AN/AN/A
Booz Allen Hamilton6.62%54.01%10.09%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hudson Capital and Booz Allen Hamilton's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudson Capital$1.37 million11.22$-62,000,000.00N/AN/A
Booz Allen Hamilton$7.46 billion1.54$482.60 million$3.1826.21

Booz Allen Hamilton has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Capital.

Volatility & Risk

Hudson Capital has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its share price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Booz Allen Hamilton has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Hudson Capital and Booz Allen Hamilton, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hudson Capital0000N/A
Booz Allen Hamilton05502.50

Booz Allen Hamilton has a consensus price target of $87.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.07%. Given Booz Allen Hamilton's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Booz Allen Hamilton is more favorable than Hudson Capital.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

40.2% of Hudson Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Booz Allen Hamilton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Booz Allen Hamilton beats Hudson Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Genpact (NYSE:G) and Hudson Capital (NASDAQ:HUSN) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Genpact and Hudson Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genpact$3.52 billion2.37$304.88 million$1.5628.60
Hudson Capital$1.37 million11.22$-62,000,000.00N/AN/A

Genpact has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Capital.

Risk and Volatility

Genpact has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudson Capital has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

97.5% of Genpact shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of Hudson Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Genpact shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Genpact and Hudson Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Genpact8.53%21.81%7.90%
Hudson CapitalN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Genpact and Hudson Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Genpact01302.75
Hudson Capital0000N/A

Genpact currently has a consensus target price of $50.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.46%. Given Genpact's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Genpact is more favorable than Hudson Capital.

Summary

Genpact beats Hudson Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

FTI Consulting (NYSE:FCN) and Hudson Capital (NASDAQ:HUSN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FTI Consulting and Hudson Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTI Consulting$2.35 billion2.07$216.73 million$5.8024.57
Hudson Capital$1.37 million11.22$-62,000,000.00N/AN/A

FTI Consulting has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Capital.

Profitability

This table compares FTI Consulting and Hudson Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTI Consulting7.56%13.27%7.18%
Hudson CapitalN/AN/AN/A

Risk and Volatility

FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudson Capital has a beta of 2.47, indicating that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.3% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of Hudson Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of FTI Consulting shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for FTI Consulting and Hudson Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTI Consulting00103.00
Hudson Capital0000N/A

FTI Consulting currently has a consensus price target of $170.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.91%. Given FTI Consulting's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FTI Consulting is more favorable than Hudson Capital.

Summary

FTI Consulting beats Hudson Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hudson Capital (NASDAQ:HUSN) and Exponent (NASDAQ:EXPO) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Hudson Capital has a beta of 2.47, indicating that its share price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Exponent has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Hudson Capital and Exponent's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hudson CapitalN/AN/AN/A
Exponent19.63%23.66%15.24%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Hudson Capital and Exponent's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudson Capital$1.37 million11.22$-62,000,000.00N/AN/A
Exponent$417.20 million11.70$82.46 million$1.5361.21

Exponent has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Capital.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Hudson Capital and Exponent, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hudson Capital0000N/A
Exponent01102.50

Exponent has a consensus price target of $94.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.79%. Given Exponent's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Exponent is more favorable than Hudson Capital.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

40.2% of Hudson Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Exponent shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Exponent shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Exponent beats Hudson Capital on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

ICF International (NASDAQ:ICFI) and Hudson Capital (NASDAQ:HUSN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

ICF International has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hudson Capital has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its share price is 147% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for ICF International and Hudson Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ICF International00403.00
Hudson Capital0000N/A

ICF International currently has a consensus target price of $103.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 12.14%. Given ICF International's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ICF International is more favorable than Hudson Capital.

Profitability

This table compares ICF International and Hudson Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ICF International4.19%10.77%4.85%
Hudson CapitalN/AN/AN/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.3% of ICF International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.2% of Hudson Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of ICF International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ICF International and Hudson Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ICF International$1.48 billion1.18$68.94 million$4.1522.22
Hudson Capital$1.37 million11.22$-62,000,000.00N/AN/A

ICF International has higher revenue and earnings than Hudson Capital.

Summary

ICF International beats Hudson Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Hudson Capital Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CGI logo
GIB
CGI
1.9$88.64-0.4%$22.41 billion$9.04 billion28.32
Booz Allen Hamilton logo
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton
2.1$83.34-0.3%$11.44 billion$7.46 billion22.71Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Genpact logo
G
Genpact
2.1$44.61-0.2%$8.34 billion$3.52 billion27.71Analyst Report
FTI Consulting logo
FCN
FTI Consulting
1.6$142.49-0.3%$4.89 billion$2.35 billion29.26Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Exponent logo
EXPO
Exponent
1.6$93.65-0.5%$4.86 billion$417.20 million62.43
ICF International logo
ICFI
ICF International
2.1$92.23-3.2%$1.74 billion$1.48 billion28.64Analyst Report
Apollo Medical logo
AMEH
Apollo Medical
0.8$30.92-1.0%$1.72 billion$560.62 million33.25High Trading Volume
Huron Consulting Group logo
HURN
Huron Consulting Group
1.7$55.42-0.5%$1.24 billion$965.47 million-277.09
The RMR Group logo
RMR
The RMR Group
1.7$39.01-3.1%$1.22 billion$589.51 million22.16Analyst Revision
The Hackett Group logo
HCKT
The Hackett Group
2.2$17.52-0.3%$531.55 million$282.47 million87.60Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Atlas Technical Consultants logo
ATCX
Atlas Technical Consultants
0.9$11.29-0.4%$398.31 millionN/A-12.41Upcoming Earnings
BlackRock Capital Investment logo
BKCC
BlackRock Capital Investment
1.0$3.91-0.3%$289.19 million$78.12 million-2.34
Information Services Group logo
III
Information Services Group
1.2$5.57-1.6%$263.12 million$265.76 million92.85Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Avalon GloboCare logo
AVCO
Avalon GloboCare
0.8$0.94-0.0%$79.36 million$1.55 million0.00
ATIF
ATIF
0.5$0.92-1.1%$42.76 million$690,000.000.00Gap Down
Lightbridge logo
LTBR
Lightbridge
0.6$5.17-2.9%$33.01 millionN/A-1.87
Wilhelmina International logo
WHLM
Wilhelmina International
0.8$5.13-1.2%$26.46 million$75.50 million-2.53
This page was last updated on 5/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected]tbeat.com | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.