NASDAQ:PROS

ProSight Global Competitors

$12.66
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$12.66
Now: $12.66
$12.69
50-Day Range
$12.50
MA: $12.62
$12.75
52-Week Range
$7.26
Now: $12.66
$14.25
Volume15,075 shs
Average Volume98,262 shs
Market Capitalization$552.70 million
P/E Ratio16.44
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.47

Competitors

ProSight Global (NASDAQ:PROS) Vs. PLMR, HMN, JRVR, PRA, SAFT, and AMSF

Should you be buying PROS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "fire, marine, & casualty insurance" are considered alternatives and competitors to ProSight Global, including Palomar (PLMR), Horace Mann Educators (HMN), James River Group (JRVR), ProAssurance (PRA), Safety Insurance Group (SAFT), and AMERISAFE (AMSF).

ProSight Global (NASDAQ:PROS) and Palomar (NASDAQ:PLMR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ProSight Global and Palomar's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11
Palomar$113.30 million16.92$10.62 million$1.7343.32

ProSight Global has higher revenue and earnings than Palomar. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palomar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.9% of ProSight Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.7% of Palomar shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Palomar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for ProSight Global and Palomar, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ProSight Global03102.25
Palomar01402.80

ProSight Global presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.58%. Palomar has a consensus target price of $96.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 29.20%. Given Palomar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Palomar is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Volatility & Risk

ProSight Global has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Palomar has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares ProSight Global and Palomar's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ProSight Global4.12%7.61%1.46%
Palomar11.97%6.95%3.98%

Summary

Palomar beats ProSight Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Horace Mann Educators (NYSE:HMN) and ProSight Global (NASDAQ:PROS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Horace Mann Educators and ProSight Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Horace Mann Educators9.18%7.96%1.02%
ProSight Global4.12%7.61%1.46%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Horace Mann Educators and ProSight Global's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Horace Mann Educators$1.43 billion1.22$184.44 million$2.2019.20
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11

Horace Mann Educators has higher revenue and earnings than ProSight Global. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Horace Mann Educators, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Horace Mann Educators and ProSight Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Horace Mann Educators02002.00
ProSight Global03102.25

Horace Mann Educators presently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.56%. ProSight Global has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.58%. Given ProSight Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ProSight Global is more favorable than Horace Mann Educators.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.9% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Horace Mann Educators shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Horace Mann Educators has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProSight Global has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Horace Mann Educators beats ProSight Global on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

James River Group (NASDAQ:JRVR) and ProSight Global (NASDAQ:PROS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

James River Group has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProSight Global has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.6% of James River Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of ProSight Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.5% of James River Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for James River Group and ProSight Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
James River Group02202.50
ProSight Global03102.25

James River Group currently has a consensus target price of $159.00, suggesting a potential upside of 212.87%. ProSight Global has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.58%. Given James River Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe James River Group is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Profitability

This table compares James River Group and ProSight Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
James River Group6.37%9.43%1.47%
ProSight Global4.12%7.61%1.46%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares James River Group and ProSight Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
James River Group$907.13 million1.72$38.34 million$1.4036.30
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11

ProSight Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than James River Group. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than James River Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

James River Group beats ProSight Global on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and ProSight Global (NASDAQ:PROS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for ProAssurance and ProSight Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ProAssurance13102.00
ProSight Global03102.25

ProAssurance currently has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.65%. ProSight Global has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.58%. Given ProSight Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ProSight Global is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Profitability

This table compares ProAssurance and ProSight Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ProAssurance-27.87%-6.92%-2.09%
ProSight Global4.12%7.61%1.46%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ProAssurance and ProSight Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProAssurance$999.83 million1.51$1 million($0.81)-34.48
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11

ProSight Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProSight Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, suggesting that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProSight Global has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

ProSight Global beats ProAssurance on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Safety Insurance Group (NASDAQ:SAFT) and ProSight Global (NASDAQ:PROS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProSight Global has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

79.8% of Safety Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of ProSight Global shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Safety Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Safety Insurance Group13.57%14.19%5.71%
ProSight Global4.12%7.61%1.46%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Safety Insurance Group0000N/A
ProSight Global03102.25

ProSight Global has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.58%. Given ProSight Global's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ProSight Global is more favorable than Safety Insurance Group.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Safety Insurance Group and ProSight Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safety Insurance Group$877.75 million1.46$99.60 millionN/AN/A
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11

Safety Insurance Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProSight Global.

AMERISAFE (NASDAQ:AMSF) and ProSight Global (NASDAQ:PROS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.5% of AMERISAFE shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of ProSight Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of AMERISAFE shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of ProSight Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares AMERISAFE and ProSight Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AMERISAFE26.84%20.22%5.99%
ProSight Global4.12%7.61%1.46%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for AMERISAFE and ProSight Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AMERISAFE01102.50
ProSight Global03102.25

AMERISAFE presently has a consensus target price of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.63%. ProSight Global has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.58%. Given AMERISAFE's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AMERISAFE is more favorable than ProSight Global.

Risk & Volatility

AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ProSight Global has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AMERISAFE and ProSight Global's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AMERISAFE$370.37 million3.37$92.69 million$4.6014.02
ProSight Global$878.06 million0.63$38.89 million$1.399.11

AMERISAFE has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProSight Global. ProSight Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMERISAFE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

AMERISAFE beats ProSight Global on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


ProSight Global Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Palomar logo
PLMR
Palomar
1.9$74.95flat$1.92 billion$113.30 million94.87Analyst Report
Horace Mann Educators logo
HMN
Horace Mann Educators
1.3$42.23flat$1.75 billion$1.43 billion14.98Increase in Short Interest
James River Group logo
JRVR
James River Group
2.2$50.82flat$1.56 billion$907.13 million34.57Analyst Report
ProAssurance logo
PRA
ProAssurance
1.4$27.93flat$1.51 billion$999.83 million-6.03Analyst Report
Safety Insurance Group logo
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
1.3$86.01flat$1.28 billion$877.75 million11.58News Coverage
AMERISAFE logo
AMSF
AMERISAFE
2.0$64.50flat$1.25 billion$370.37 million13.52
Employers logo
EIG
Employers
1.6$39.82flat$1.13 billion$784.80 million13.87Upcoming Earnings
State Auto Financial logo
STFC
State Auto Financial
1.4$20.51flat$903.30 million$1.41 billion-22.79Analyst Downgrade
United Fire Group logo
UFCS
United Fire Group
1.2$33.88flat$851.07 million$1.20 billion-6.67
BlackRock TCP Capital logo
TCPC
BlackRock TCP Capital
1.3$14.60flat$843.40 million$195.17 million35.61Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
WTRE
Watford
0.8$34.84flat$692.86 million$687.36 million-7.43Analyst Upgrade
HCI Group logo
HCI
HCI Group
2.4$76.57flat$660.34 million$242.47 million20.86News Coverage
Donegal Group logo
DGICA
Donegal Group
1.8$16.41flat$496.83 million$812.45 million8.97Dividend Increase
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Donegal Group logo
DGICB
Donegal Group
1.3$14.95flat$452.63 million$812.45 million9.01Dividend Increase
News Coverage
Universal Insurance logo
UVE
Universal Insurance
2.4$13.99flat$436.57 million$939.35 million-33.31
NI logo
NODK
NI
0.7$19.21flat$409.54 million$270.78 million11.79Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Global Indemnity Group logo
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group
1.0$27.76flat$399.83 million$604.47 million63.09
Tiptree logo
TIPT
Tiptree
1.1$10.10flat$328.63 million$772.73 million-8.56Gap Up
Protective Insurance logo
PTVCB
Protective Insurance
0.9$22.95flat$324.88 million$495.60 million-85.00
Protective Insurance logo
PTVCA
Protective Insurance
0.7$22.92flat$324.46 million$495.60 million-84.89
Greenlight Capital Re logo
GLRE
Greenlight Capital Re
0.7$9.02flat$317.41 million$538.15 million-4.80Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
United Insurance logo
UIHC
United Insurance
1.7$7.18flat$309.37 million$825.12 million-4.33Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Heritage Insurance logo
HRTG
Heritage Insurance
2.8$10.89flat$304.54 million$511.30 million16.25News Coverage
Maiden logo
MHLD
Maiden
0.6$3.43flat$298.88 million$576.14 million26.39Increase in Short Interest
KFS
Kingsway Financial Services
0.8$4.63flat$105.15 million$59.95 million0.00
Kingstone Companies logo
KINS
Kingstone Companies
1.4$8.56flat$91.60 million$145.56 million-142.64Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
FedNat logo
FNHC
FedNat
2.0$4.49flat$80.03 million$414.96 million-1.31Decrease in Short Interest
ICCH
ICC
0.9$15.30flat$50.43 million$59.53 million16.45
Conifer logo
CNFR
Conifer
0.8$3.61flat$34.95 million$96 million-6.12Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Unico American logo
UNAM
Unico American
0.7$4.76flat$25.25 million$31.37 million-1.16News Coverage
Gap Up
OXBR
Oxbridge Re
0.4$1.92flat$11.00 million$980,000.00-64.00Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.